Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic syntax tree (2nd nomination)

Dynamic syntax tree

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Dynamic syntax tree
• Articles for deletion/Dynamic syntax tree (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Dynamic syntax tree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been based on citations to a single author (David Syman) for years. I've done some checking and I can't find any refs independent of this author (there is a group of 2-3 individuals who coauthor papers on this subject with each other). The only use of this concept seems to be a product called 'Security Reviewer' - and all three authors are employed by this company. I don't think this meets WP:GNG as there are no independent references, so this article should be deleted. MrOllie (talk) 13:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

• Merge (very selectively) to Program analysis or similar article. I fired off an abortive AfD for this four years ago then realized it should be a merge proposal - which I then never set up. This may be worth a short mention within an article on the wider topic, but it's definitely not notable enough for a standalone. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)