Talk:MEAN (solution stack)

Internet Unassessed

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Should MEAN still be indicated as open-source, as MongoDB's license is no longer recognized as such?

Proposed Deletion is Unfounded

Recently, a contributor added a proposed deletion (PROD), suggesting that this article is insufficiently notable to warrant a wikipedia article. I disagree. The MEAN stack is common vernacular amongst hackathon participants, as I may attribute writing this at the Spring 2015 PennApps hackathon, and as may be corroborated by Valeri Karpov in his blog post coining the term.

If anyone disagrees, particularly he who added the PROD (RHaworth), and he who replaced it after it was removed (CanadianLinuxUser), the latter with no other explanation than the edit summary "Please do not remove tag," I invite you to comment. ----Mmpozulp (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IF one reads the Proposed deletion notice is clearly states 'The article may be deleted if this message remains in place for seven days, i.e., after 14:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC).' Please wait the 7 days. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply and the suggestion to read the PROD notice more closely. In the PROD article, under the bold text declaring that "There are three steps to the PROD process," step 2 says: "If anybody objects to the deletion (usually by removing the tag - see full instructions below), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed." Did not contributor at 62.6.248.134 object and remove the tag? I as well object. I would remove the tag if I did not believe that you, in violation of the PROD process, will immediately replace it once again. Did you simply misunderstand the intent or process of the PROD? ----Mmpozulp (talk) 08:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I put it back... I missed the note "If anyone, including the article creator, removes a "proposed deletion/dated" tag from an article, do not replace it... CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's probably good too leave it, but it needs to be expanded. When/how/why is the MEAN stack typically used? 75.158.23.29 (talk) 23:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]