Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2021 CUOS appointments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 217.76.10.114 (talk) at 20:17, 15 September 2021 (Kl). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Kl

Appointment process

Dates are provisional and subject to change
Applications: 6 September to 18 September
Candidates self-nominate by email to arbcom-en-c@wikimedia.org. Each candidate will receive an application questionnaire to be completed and returned to the arbcom-en-c mailing list before the nomination period ends. The questionnaire will include a nomination statement, to a maximum of 250 words, for inclusion on the candidate's public nomination sub-page(s).
Review period: 19 September to 23 September
The committee will review applications and ask the functionary team for their feedback.
Notification of candidates: 24 September to 26 September
The committee will notify candidates going forward for community consultation and create the candidate subpages containing the submitted nomination statements.
Community consultation: 27 September to 6 October
Nomination statements will be published and candidates invited to answer questions publicly. The community is invited to participate. Please note changes from previous consultation phases:
  • Editors may ask a maximum of two questions per candidate;
  • Editors may comment on each candidate with a limit of 500 words, including replies to other editors. Discussion will be sectioned and monitored by the Arbitration Committee and the clerks;
  • Please refrain from bolded votes, as this is a consultation and not a community consensus.
Comments may be posted on the candidates' subpages or submitted privately by email to arbcom-en-c@wikimedia.org. Editors are encouraged to include a detailed rationale, supported by relevant links where appropriate.
Appointments: by 17 October
The committee will review community comments and other relevant factors, finalize an internal resolution, and publish the resulting appointments. Successful candidates are required to sign the Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information prior to receiving permissions. Oversighters and CheckUsers who intend to work the VRT paid editing queue must sign the VRT Users Confidentiality Agreement.