Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Administrators' how-to guide

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by B (talk | contribs) at 06:29, 30 January 2007 (Is this thing about bot rollback right?: cquote not working). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Deleting an image

Does this description need to be updated? My impression is that something has changed about this. Jkelly 05:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I'm an admin in Commons and if this is true, I've been deleting a hell of a lot of image description pages, and precisely 0 images... pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge page history

In fact, the mergehist function can be undone, see Wikipedia:How_to_fix_cut_and_paste_moves#How_to_undo_a_history_merge. The process is:

  1. Suppose A has been history merged into B.
  2. We want to get A's former history back into A.
  3. Delete B.
  4. Selectively undelete the revisions of B that made up the history of A before the history merge.
  5. Move B to A.
  6. Undelete the rest of the revisions of B.
  7. If A and/or B is now a redirect to itself or the other article, then revert or change the redirect target, as deemed appropriate.

I will change the statement that they can not be undone to that it can be done, but is a long process. Polonium 19:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new and trying not to be reckless. In that spirit, I'd like to suggest that the "Bureaucrats' how-to guide" link be changed from: [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Instructions for sysoping someone|Bureaucrats' how-to guide]] to [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats|Bureaucrats' how-to guide]]. --CiphershortTalk 00:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merger with advice for beginners

I am opposed. The advice is more personal and informal in nature. This article is specifically on how to do certain tasks adminsitrators do. They are fundamentally different in nature. Slrubenstein | Talk 12:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this thing about bot rollback right?

In cases of large scale vandalism that flood recent changes, you may use "bot rollback". Add &bot=1 to the end of the URL used to access a user's contributions. For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=Vandal&bot=1. When the rollback links on the contributions list are clicked, the revert, and the original edit that you are reverting will both be hidden from the default Recentchanges display.

I just tried this on the sandbox and my edit was not botflagged. Is this out of date or something? --BigDT 06:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]