Talk:Integrated Encryption Scheme

Cryptography: Computer science Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

It would help tremendously if someone would actually define what O stands for here, since it is important that P does not equal to it. Atuomi (talk) 18:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Martin's todo note:

Make the notation line up between formal and informal descriptions. Mpdehnel (talk) 16:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple issues: Imprecise language, confusing structure, plus structural statements contradict structure of article

Only wolfSSL is mentioned to implement this scheme (but presumably it only implements ECIES), while Botan, Bouncy Castle, BSAFE and Crypto++ also might implement ECIES. (September 2021)
It is not mentioned to be standardised by an official standardisation body, but multiple research papers mention ECIES to be defined in the standards ANSI X9.63, ISO/IEC 18033-2 and IEEE 1363A (only the industry specification SECG SEC 1 is mentioned and linked to, here). (September 2021)
It might be better to clearly separate DLIES and ECIES into different sections after the extant, general introduction of IES. (September 2021)