Talk:Triangular prismatic honeycomb

Mathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Triangular prismatic honeycomb article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Convexity

The illustrations give the "Type" of each tessellation as "Convex uniform honeycomb|Uniform honeycomb" (Uniform honeycomb) in all cases but the second-last (gyrated triangular prismatic honeycomb), where it's named simply "Convex uniform honeycomb" (Convex uniform honeycomb). I can't see any good reason to treat them differently. Each has the comment "It is one of 28 convex uniform honeycombs."

And the last illustration (gyroelongated triangular prismatic honeycomb) may be of a uniform honeycomb, but is it convex? It alone doesn't have the comment "It is one of 28 convex uniform honeycombs."

yoyo (talk) 19:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duals

what are the duals of the last two? KlokkoVanDenBerg (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]