Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual modularity
Looks like a research article for an academic publication rather than encyclopedic entry Alex Bakharev 22:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep pending a better deletion reason - I'm not sure what policy this is supposed to be against. The article is clearly an academic article and so does read like most other articles, however it's replete with references, does not seem to be original research. May be a limited point of view but it's beyond my technical knowledge to determine. - Peripitus (Talk) 23:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)