Jump to content

Green transport hierarchy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 18:28, 7 August 2021 (Add: journal. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by BrownHairedGirl | Linked from User:BrownHairedGirl/Articles_with_bare_links | #UCB_webform_linked 1319/2200). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


The Green transport hierarchy (Canada), street user hierarchy (US), sustainable transport hierarchy (Wales),[1] urban transport hierarchy or road user hierarchy (Australia, UK)[2] is a hierarchy of modes of transport of road users. It is the basic concept of transport reform groups worldwide.[3][4] In 2020, the UK government consulted about adding to the Highway Code a road user hierarchy prioritising pedestrians.[5] It is a key characteristic of Australian transport planning.[6]

Green transport hierarchy
Pedestrians
Bicycles
Public transit
Trucks and commercial vehicles
Taxis
High occupancy vehicles
Cars and single occupancy vehicles

History

The Green Transportation Hierarchy: : A Guide for Personal & Public Decision-Making, by Chris Bradshaw, was first published September 1994[7] and revised June 2004.[citation needed] It was first prepared for Ottawalk and the Transportation Working Committee of the Ottawa-Carleton Round-table on the Environment in January 1992 only stating 'Walk, Cycle, Bus, Truck, Car'.[8]

Factors

  1. Mode
  2. Energy source
  3. Trip length
  4. Trip speed
  5. Vehicle size
  6. Passenger load factor
  7. Trip segment
  8. Trip purpose
  9. Traveller

Adoption

The author directed the hierarchy at both individual lifestyle choices and public authorities who should officially direct their resources; funds, moral suasion, and formal sanctions – based on the factors.

Bradshaw described the hierarchy to be logical, but the effect of applying it will seem radical. [9]

The model rejects the concept of the balanced transportation system, where users are assumed to be free to choose between many options. This is because choices incorporating factors that are ranked low generally have a high impact on other choices.

See also

References

  1. ^ Reid, Carlton. "Car Dependency Must End, Transport Minister Lee Waters Tells Welsh Parliament". Forbes.
  2. ^ https://infrastructure.gov.au/infrastructure/pab/active_transport/files/active_travel_discussion.pdf. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  3. ^ "Pedestrian and bicyclist safety and mobility in Europe /". Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA.
  4. ^ http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/537680874
  5. ^ "What do Highway Code proposals mean for pedestrians and cyclists?". the Guardian. 28 July 2020.
  6. ^ "2. Key characteristics of active travel". Australian Transport Assessment and Planning.
  7. ^ Yang, Jiawen; Alterman, Rachelle; Li, Bin (2020). "References". Value Capture Beyond Public Land Leasing. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy: 45–49.
  8. ^ "The Valuing of Trips - Transportation - Sierra Club". vault.sierraclub.org.
  9. ^ see a separate paper by the author, ‘Using Our Feet to Reduce Our Footprint: The Importance of Scale in Life’ (1997) for the ‘NRFUT’ system of comparing the ‘footprint’ of different trips.