Jump to content

Canon (basic principle)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JMF (talk | contribs) at 07:55, 3 August 2021 (Moved IP editor contribution to new section. Disentangled mess of ideas and concepts.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The concept of canon is very broad; in a general sense it refers to being one (adjectival) or a group (noun) of official, authentic or approved rules or laws, particularly ecclesiastical; or group of official, authentic, or approved literary or artistic works, such as the literature of a particular author, of a particular genre, or a particular group of religious scriptural texts,[1] or similarly, one or a body of rules, principles, or standards accepted as axiomatic and universally binding in a religion, or a field of study or art.[2]

This principle has led to more specific uses, such as literary canons.[3]

W.C Sayers (1915–1916) established a system of canons of library classification.[4]

S. R. Ranganathan developed a theory of facet analysis which he presented as a detailed series of 46 canons, 13 postulates and 22 principles.[5]

There is also the concept of the canons of rhetoric, including five key principles that, when grouped together, are the principles set for giving speeches.[6]

Etymology

The term 'canon' comes from the Greek κανών (Template:Transl), meaning (amongst others) "pole" or "rule".[7] It was transported from Greek to Arabic and then into early Turkish.[citation needed] It must have been divulgated[clarification needed] during the Ottoman rule.[citation needed]

See also

References

  1. ^ canon. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers. 2019. {{cite encyclopedia}}: |website= ignored (help)
  2. ^ "canon". Dictionary.reference.com. Dictionary.com, LL. 2019. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
  3. ^ WordNet 3.1. retrieved 2011-12-03 from: [http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webw
  4. ^ Sayers, W.C. (1915-1916). Canons of classification applied to "The subject", "The expansive", "The decimal" and "The Library of Congress" classifications: A study in bibliographical classification method. Lindon: Grafton.
  5. ^ Prolegomena to library classification. New York: Asia Publishing House. Spiteri, Louise (1998). A Simplified Model for Facet Analysis: Ranganathan 101. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science—Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Information et de Bibliotheconomie, 23(1-2), 1-30., Retrieved from: http://iainstitute.org/en/learn/research/a_simplified_model_for_facet_analysis.php
  6. ^ Toye, Richard (2013). Rhetoric A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-965136-8.
  7. ^ "Canon". Dictionary.com. Random House, Inc. Retrieved September 29, 2014.