Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coye Brook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 02:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coye Brook

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nondescript creek. It is said that "Major geographical and geological features featured on maps, such as ... rivers" are notable, but this is not major and is smaller than a river. Geschichte (talk) 09:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 09:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Bulk-produced nothingness, no indication of notability and presence on maps or a database of map names is not enough. Reywas92^Talk 16:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The preferred criteria for this, rather than WP:MAPOUTCOMES, is WP:GEOLAND criterion 4; with that in mind, this does not pass that criterion as there is no information on the creek beyond its coordinates. Curbon7 (talk) 01:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.