Jump to content

Talk:Extension problem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by John Baez (talk | contribs) at 18:32, 26 January 2007 (caught a mistake). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I think that the distinction between K being a subgroup of G or only being isomorphic to one is not important, because there is a specific isomorphism between them. This language doesn't really generalize anything, it just makes it a bit more confusing. Gregory Muller 13:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Group Extension

I'm not sure there are enough interesting things to say about group extensions other than their classification to merit its own entry. Gregory Muller 13:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

The claim that classifies central extensions of by is wrong. classifies only abelian extensions. Central extensions are classified by group cohomology, namely , which is a gadget that makes sense after we've specified an action of on . So, someone should fix this. It may have to be me. John Baez 18:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]