Talk:Fedora Linux

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fedora Linux article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2021: 6 months

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Linux B‑class High‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as High-importance).

Fedora Linux was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 9, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
October 15, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
July 19, 2014	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

Archives

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Rawhide_(computing) was copied or moved into Fedora_(operating_system)#Rawhide with this edit on 09:05, 7 December 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux)

Both of these entries redirect to "Fedora (operating system)" but neither is mentioned on the page. This needs to be fixed! Urhixidur (talk) 17:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Urhixidur Weird. Shouldn't EPEL be redirected to Red Hat Enterprise Linux and CentOS? The first article does mention it! User:Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 19:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EPEL is organised by a Fedora Special Interest Group, so it probably warrants a mention here *and* in the RHEL page. Or its own article, I guess. --Earin (t) 12:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion re OS family

A discussion related to this article is in progress at Template talk:infobox OS#OS family. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 14:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Linus and Fedora

While it is factually true that Linus uses Fedora the sentence misses context. Linus said he is not a distribution or MIS person, he is not interested in maintaining Linux machines. He says is a "technical person" because he wrote the kernel but that is different. He says once he learns a distribution he sticks with it so he can get on with life ie. writing kernels. It is thought he chose Fedora because of its support for PowerPC. In short, Linus's decision to use Fedora is somewhat random and not particularly notable when given proper context. It is like a sports star who drives a certain model car is purely promotional, not because the sports star is an expert on cars. The question is do we promote Fedora this way, and if so, do we include text and sources that place it into proper context. -- GreenC 17:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems

Because the Wikipedia article looks like subjective marketing material there should objectively be "problems" chapter too. For example clearly describing that one should use only the latest version because earlier versions will be unsupported, and if suddenly later on supported then you'll end up upgrading anyway. Due to simple facts like kernel is compiled using gcc version which is not available when you need to compile modules.

Naturally clear statement facts and no whining but please write objectively. seen engineer pornography enough. //arl — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.157.84.67 (talk • contribs)

"ফেডোরা (অপারেটিং সিস্টেম)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ফেডোরা (অপারেটিং সিস্টেম). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 17#ফেডোরা (অপারেটিং সিস্টেম) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:00, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]