Talk:Freecode

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Freecode or freshmeat?

"freshmeat" -- all lower case -- appears to be the project's own way of referring to itself, shouldn't Wikipedia® follow that example? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.180.156.58 (talk) 14:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But they appear to have re-branded themselves as "FreeCode". I am curious why they did that. 82.32.31.166 (talk) 21:19, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where's old "freshMeat" logo?

↑ Who wiped it? Where's old "freshMeat" logo, once again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.215.97.99 (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox displays the current logo. Ringbang (talk) 00:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Open Hub vs. Freshcode

The article says "However, Open Hub also lists open source projects and already offers more information on projects than Freecode." This, however, is not strictly true, as the two sites focus on different parts of projects. Open Hub gathers statistics on used languages, licenses, contributors, and lines of code per language. It is meant and optimized for analyzing and finding structural information on open source projects. Freshcode, on the other hand, focuses on the users of open source projects, by storing descriptions, topical tags, and detailed information on releases of projects. 129.69.215.56 (talk) 08:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Freecode. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://freecode.com/about
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://freecode.com/articles/whats-in-a-name
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://freecode.com/about

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]