Talk:Positive computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The article is difficult to read and on some sentences it is necessary to spend some seconds to read them again to fully understand. Can you be more precise on the description? for example, in the chapter "Well-being in technology and technology research" can you name a technology for each category that are identified? Can you expand on the concept of superintelligence? can you name some example of common ideals and the debate behind them (if present)? --Ettore morosini (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

The article aims to intoduce a very interesting topic. However it's not well articulated in terms of content and main issue of discussion within the article. An early section about the defintion of computing or what does it the terminology refer to after the lead section would be appreciated. Computing and technology have been used interchangebly; which in some cases might confuse the reader about what does it really mean, and for a non-expret reader computing might mean a diffeent notion than the intended notion in the article.

The section about Design, seems quite separated from the main topic of discussion. it seems to jump into a descussion about the general design prococess followed in differet design practices. However the connection with positive computing can not be seen clearly.

The section for superintelligence, aslo sounds fragmented as it doesn't build a clear connection with the previous section.

The article over all is lacking an organinc structure so that all the sections would have clear connections with each other.

--Criticaldesigner (talk) 14:13, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]