Talk:Compressed instruction set

A fact from Compressed instruction set appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 May 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that some microprocessors feature a compressed instruction set that packs machine-language instructions into a more memory-efficient size?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/compressed instruction set.

Wikipedia

Computing C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that some microprocessors feature a compressed instruction set that pack machine language instructions into a more memory-efficient size? Source: SH-5 CPU Core, page 8

Reviewed: Glory to Rome

Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 22:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

The article is new enough and long enough with no copyright violations. A QPQ has been completed. The hook is fine, but the modern use section needs to be referenced. SL93 (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SL93: Added. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This is ready. SL93 (talk) 23:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]