Talk:Chimila language

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 3 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pjb202 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Lexieb619.

Languages Stub‑class

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Colombia Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Colombia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The lead sentence has been updated to reflect the new content of this article; the sentence concisely describes this articles topic. However, the lead does not give a preview of the article’s other sections. It is concise, with a proper number of details. The newly added content is relative to the topic of the Chimila language. The content is up to date, with references being as recent as 2005 and 2015. All of the content belongs, but there should be a clearer explanation of how and why the names of local rivers and departments are connected to the Chimila language. The newly added content is neutral and shows no bias. The first and second links did not work for me, but the third one did. There likely needs to be more sources reflecting a variety of authors. Overall, the content is concise, clear, and easy to read. Though not complete, I believe the article has it's strengths and insightful information. Lexieb619 (talk) 20:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC) Lexie Busby[reply]

Hi Lexie, I have copied your comment to your classmate's page, User:Pjb202/Chimila_language/Lexieb619_Peer_Review so that they can see it. Chuck Haberl (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]