Jump to content

Talk:Graph Query Language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by A James Green (talk | contribs) at 10:51, 8 April 2021 (A James Green moved page Talk:Graph Query Language to Talk:GQL (Graph Query Language): This follows a discussion on a prior move at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cedar101&oldid=1009843283#Move_of_%22GQL_Graph_Query_Language%22_to_%22Graph_Query_Language%22_is_wrong Move of GQL Graph Query Language to Graph Query Language is wrong]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconArticles for creation C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 6 March 2020 by reviewer AugusteBlanqui (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconComputer science C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work!.

North8000 (talk) 18:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An interesting article, but it depends heavily on self-published or involved sources, and some sections are far too detailed - especially "Extending existing graph query languages" contains lots of secondary details of questionable relevance and with almost no independent sources. As a quick example, the sections about "Cypher implementations" and "Cypher 9 and Cypher 10" contain exactly zero independent sources. If these developments in existing graph query languages are really that significant - from an encyclopedic point of view -, someone else other than the developing companies or organizations should have written about them. If not, the excessive level of detail in this list section is inappropriate undue weight and should be trimmed. GermanJoe (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KeithWHare (talk) 11:22, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of the points being made in "Extending existing graph query languages" is that multiple vendors with multiple languages are involved in the GQL standards process. To me, the details are useful and appropriate, but I am highly involved in the standards process.
I'm not sure how to get "someone else other than the developing companies or organizations" to write about the property graph work -- we have been working to get everyone who is interested involved in either in the standards process directly or in LDBC work that is contributing to the standards process.