Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association for Learning Environments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Association for Learning Environments

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an organization, not properly referenced as passing WP:ORGDEPTH. As always, companies and organizations are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because it's technically verifiable that they exist -- they need to have reliable source coverage about the organization in media in order to establish their significance. But the footnotes (and the excessive linkfarm of external links) here are all primary sources, such as its own self-published website the self-published websites of other directly affiliated organizations, with no evidence of any reliable or notability-supporting media coverage shown at all. Bearcat (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Related discussions: 2020-11 Prakash Nair ✓ keep

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 04:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.