User talk:Deus omnipotens sum

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Deus omnipotens sum (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I managed to "work things out" with the other user concerned, and was blocked anyway? I insulted him conditionally, i.e. that he's a fool for not taking the opportunity... and he took the opportunity, so he's not a fool. Deus omnipotens sum (talk) 20:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I managed to "work things out" with the other user concerned, and was blocked ''anyway''?  I insulted him conditionally, i.e. that he's a fool for not taking the opportunity... and he took the opportunity, so he's not a fool. [[User:Deus omnipotens sum|Deus omnipotens sum]] ([[User talk:Deus omnipotens sum#top|talk]]) 20:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I managed to "work things out" with the other user concerned, and was blocked ''anyway''?  I insulted him conditionally, i.e. that he's a fool for not taking the opportunity... and he took the opportunity, so he's not a fool. [[User:Deus omnipotens sum|Deus omnipotens sum]] ([[User talk:Deus omnipotens sum#top|talk]]) 20:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I managed to "work things out" with the other user concerned, and was blocked ''anyway''?  I insulted him conditionally, i.e. that he's a fool for not taking the opportunity... and he took the opportunity, so he's not a fool. [[User:Deus omnipotens sum|Deus omnipotens sum]] ([[User talk:Deus omnipotens sum#top|talk]]) 20:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

WP:GRATUITOUS

Regarding this, see what I stated here. Yes, WP:Not censored is important. So is WP:GRATUITOUS. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:41, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deepin Desktop Environment moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Deepin Desktop Environment, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Quantum chess concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Quantum chess, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Quantum chess

Hello, Deus omnipotens sum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Quantum chess".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tautology. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voiced glottal fricative

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Voiced glottal fricative. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Template:Z187

Vulgarisms (in English or even other languages) are not allowed on Wikipedia. Moson81 (talk) 11:38, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Osobní útoky

Vaše osobní útoky si laskavě odpusťte. Vulgarity na Wikipedii nepatří, takže si to laskavě uvědomte. Urážet se nenechám, vaše urážky ukazují na vaši inteligenci, oproti ní je IQ tykve geniální. Píšu na zdejší nástěnku správců. Moson81 (talk) 08:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 10:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI thread

I inform you about this thread: [1]. Moson81 (talk) 11:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for rude insults - in a thread complaining about your previous rude insults - demonstrate an inability to collaboratively edit with others. i assume this was intentionally done to get blocked?.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I apologise to you calling you vandal, but please don't insult me. I don't insult you anymore... Moson81 (talk) 20:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Deus omnipotens sum (talk) 20:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]