Talk:Computational cognition
Appearance
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
Reader be advised: This paper presents a personal view (I think from a single individual, viz. Toa Yang), *not* a widely adopted or accepted definition of cognition. IvR 14-1-2007
I suggest that this page be merged with the page Cognitive Science. IvR 14-1-2007
Is this even a field? 9-2-2011 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.129.105.221 (talk) 04:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- Start-Class Computer science articles
- Unknown-importance Computer science articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class neuroscience articles
- Low-importance neuroscience articles
- Start-Class psychology articles
- Unknown-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles