Talk:Scientific method
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scientific method article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | Note: this article has existed since the first year of the encyclopedia and has had hundreds of editors with thousands of edits. Before making substantive changes to scientific method, it may be prudent to read the archives first, and to discuss objections on this talk page (at the bottom, or foot of the page). It is customary to post new topics to the foot of this talk page, so that when this page is archived, the developments in the article can be read in the archives, in time-order, from oldest to newest. |
Confusing sentence
The sentence "Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, they are frequently the same from one to another." is confusing and seems to contradict itself. Should it say something more like "Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, they generally follow similar principles."? Or something flowing more naturally into the next sentence "...are all based on deriving predictions from hypotheses..." etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.238.250.150 (talk) 20:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
New research sidebar
I think the inclusion of the new research sidebar would be of use for this page, potentially placed underneath the current science sidebar. Jamzze (talk) 06:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC) {{Research}}
"Invariant scientific explanations."
There is a photobox of a physicist which notes his support of "invariant" explanations, yet there is no point in the article that addresses what an "invariant" explanation is or why it would be supported.
The article should change such that either:
1: There is a new section about "invariance," and his photo be moved there. [This is the edit that was made]
or
2: His photo be removed from the article.
- Old requests for peer review
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- High-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class epistemology articles
- High-importance epistemology articles
- Epistemology task force articles
- B-Class philosophy of science articles
- High-importance philosophy of science articles
- Philosophy of science task force articles
- B-Class Skepticism articles
- Top-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- B-Class science articles
- Top-importance science articles
- B-Class history of science articles
- Top-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles
- B-Class sociology articles
- Top-importance sociology articles
- B-Class South Africa articles
- Unknown-importance South Africa articles
- B-Class PSP SA articles
- Unknown-importance PSP SA articles
- Wikipedia Primary School articles
- WikiProject South Africa articles
- B-Class Biology articles
- Top-importance Biology articles
- WikiProject Biology articles
- B-Class Evolutionary biology articles
- Top-importance Evolutionary biology articles
- WikiProject Evolutionary biology articles
- B-Class physics articles
- Top-importance physics articles
- B-Class physics articles of Top-importance
- B-Class Chemistry articles
- Top-importance Chemistry articles
- WikiProject Chemistry articles
- B-Class Geology articles
- Top-importance Geology articles
- Top-importance B-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- B-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles