User:DylanPE/Computer Assisted Language Learning
Notes on current article
- lacks recent references (past decade)
- outdated/unnecessary technological details (could be relegated to a 'History' section?)
- many references are given without explaining anything in them (could be separated into 'Further Reading', an annotated bibliography?)
Planned changes
- add information about modern (e.g. web/mobile app) technologies, affordances/constraints
- updates to "Internet" section
- add some context/information on (more recent) intersection with SLA, learning outcomes
- maybe something about implicit versus explicit learning and outcomes?
- updates to "Pedagogy" section
- maybe something about corpora/concordancers? (e.g. Linguee)
- maybe something about problems related to CALL
- Link to Mobile assisted language learning
Drafting
Sections to add/edit:
- Dylan - Problems/Criticism and Effects of CALL
- Meredith - Mobile-assisted Language Learning. Link to other article
- Alex - Web 2.0 Technologies, CMC
Revision/addition to "CALL: Internet"
The emergence of the World Wide Web and graphical web browsers in the early 1990s marked a significant change in the use of communications technology. The launch of the Web in the public arena offered possible applications in a number of areas, including for language teachers. Many language teachers were already familiar with the concept of hypertext on stand-alone computers (e.g. using Apple's HyperCard software), which made it possible to set up non-sequential structured reading activities for language learners in which they could point to text or images on a page on the computer screen and branch to any other pages. The Web provided a similar framework on a larger scale, as a worldwide hypertext system in which the user could use links to navigate between different webpages from anywhere in the world. This opened up access to thousands of authentic foreign-language websites that teachers and students could use in a variety of ways. A problem that arose, however, was that this could lead to a good deal of time-wasting if Web browsing was used in an unstructured way (Davies 1997: pp. 42–43).[1] Language teachers responded by developing more structured activities and online exercises (Leloup & Ponterio 2003),[2] for example using free authoring tools like Hot Potatoes (first demonstrated publicly at the EUROCALL 1998 conference) to create their own online interactive exercises.[3] Davies (2010) lists over 500 websites, where links to online exercises can be found, along with links to online dictionaries and encyclopaedias, concordancers, translation aids and other miscellaneous resources of interest to the language teacher and learner.[4]
In the early days of the Web, slow connections and poor sound and video quality limited the capabilities of webpages compared to existing multimedia CALL technologies like CD-ROM and DVD. Since then, however, network technologies have improved and web-based CALL has largely supplanted these media. One area in which CD-ROMs and DVDs are still superior is in the presentation of listen/respond/playback activities,[citation needed] although such activities on the Web are continually improving. [( this last sentence isn't cited, and is probably outdated. remove? )]
Starting in the early 2000s, there was a boom in the development of so-called Web 2.0 applications, in which emphasis shifted from web browsing, as an essentially one-way process from the webpage to the end-user, to the use of interactive web applications permitting greater social interaction and sharing. Walker, Davies & Hewer (2011: Section 2.1)[5] list multiple examples of relevant applications, including image storage and sharing, social bookmarking, discussion lists, blogs, wikis, social networking, chat rooms, MUDs, virtual worlds, podcasting, audio and video sharing, animation tools, and mashups.
[( this is where I would add information from Reinders & Stockwell[6] and Parmaxi & Zaphiris[7] )]
...
[( these are sort of unsupported/undeveloped claims at the end of the current version... )]
Language teachers have made use of a wide range of facilities provided by the Web: see Dudeney (2007)[8] and Thomas (2008).[9]
The use of Web 2.0 tools calls for a careful reexamination of the role of the teacher in the classroom (Richardson 2006).[10]
Addition: Criticism of CALL
Computer assisted Language Learning might be better at somethings than others depending on pedagogical practice. Syntax, it appears...[(Not so sure about this citation)][11]
Possible resources
Reinders, H. & Stockwell, G. (2017). Computer-assisted second language acquisition. [1]
A more up to date overview, written for a handbook for L2 pedagogy.
Parmaxi, A. & Zaphiris, P. (2016). Web 2.0 in Computer-Assisted Language Learning. [2]
Recent-ish summary of some of the newer web technologies. Maybe not recent enough.
Bibauwa, S., François, T., & Desmet, P. (2019). Research synthesis and conceptual framework of dialogue-based CALL. [3]
Review of research on the subfield of `dialogue-based CALL'...
Mobile-assisted language learning (cf. MALL)
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2018). Mobile-assisted language learning. [4]
Loewen, S. & al. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. [5]
Gonulal, T. (2019). The Use of Instagram as a Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Tool. [6]
Call Pedagogical practices
Heift, T. and Rimrott, A. (2012), Task‐Related Variation in Computer‐Assisted Language Learning.
Modern Language Journal, 96: 525-543. https://doi-org.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01392.x [11][(Not so sure about this citation)]
General links
A useful database for articles: https://eric.ed.gov/
A general handbook: The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning
EUROCALL short papers: https://eric.ed.gov/?q=eurocall+short+papers
Citations
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
davieslessons
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ LeLoup J. & Ponterio R. (2003) "Interactive and multimedia techniques in online language lessons: a sampler", Language Learning & Technology 7, 3 [Online]: http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/net/default.html
- ^ Holmes M. & Arneil S. Hot Potatoes, University of Victoria, Canada. Downloadable from: http://hotpot.uvic.ca: A library of Clipart for use with Hot Potatoes and other authoring tools is also available at the University of Victoria site: http://hcmc.uvic.ca/clipart/
- ^ Davies G. (2010) Graham Davies's Favourite Websites
- ^ Walker R., Davies G. & Hewer S. (2011) Introduction to the Internet. Module 1.5 in Davies G. (ed.) Information and Communications Technology for Language Teachers (ICT4LT), Slough, Thames Valley University [Online]: http://www.ict4lt.org/en/en_mod1-5.htm
- ^ Reinders, H., & Stockwell, G. (2017). Computer-assisted SLA. The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition, 361-375.
- ^ Parmaxi, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2017). Web 2.0 in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: a research synthesis and implications for instructional design and educational practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 704-716.
- ^ Dudeney G. (2007) The Internet and the language classroom, Second Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Thomas M. (2008) Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global.
- ^ Richardson W. (2006) Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts and the Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
- ^ a b "UNC Chapel Hill Libraries". doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01392.x#citedby-section. Retrieved 2021-03-02.