Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threadbombing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:35, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Threadbombing

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Fails WP:GNG. DJFace1 (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a notable website. The one working reference isn't what I'd consider substantial coverage. Nothing found in Google search, apart from a Twitter profile with no followers. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator has been blocked as a spam sockpuppeteer, however I am leaving this nomination open so that it can be evaluated on its merits. MER-C 11:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The concept might be notable, but this website with that name is not. Bearian (talk) 15:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.