Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Grant (programmer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nsk92 (talk | contribs) at 16:56, 24 February 2021 (additional comments on new additions to the article, COI). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Trevor Grant (programmer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing how this would pass WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Can't find any publications by this subject (even though he is characterized as an "author" in the article) or any independent sources covering him. Does not appear to pass WP:GNG or any other notability guidelines. Nsk92 (talk) 11:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As noted below, User:Rawkintrevo appears to be the subject of this article, per their self-identification at their user page. They have already made a major edit [1] to the article, introducing WP:COI. The abortive political candidacy for a relatively minor local office is not notable. The edit also mentions a new paper, published in Sept 2020, and a new book[2], with several co-authors, also published in 2020. There is no indication that either work received significant coverage/reviews/citations that could contribute to potential WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR notability. Nsk92 (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Will update this today- please give me a week to back fill publications before deletion. 24, February 2021 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rawkintrevo (talkcontribs) 14:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Commment AfD discussions typically stay open for a week anyway. But as your userpage indicates you are Trevor Grant, it's probably unwise for you to edit the page yourself as it's a conflict of interest (see WP:COI), but can add requests for edits to the Talk page, or make a case for not deleting here, which will be taken into account by whoever closes the discussion. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The article is clearly PROMO. None of his listed accomplishments(?) are remotely close to conferring automatic notability and independent coverage of him is entirely passing or run-of-the-mill. There's also a possible BLP-violating quote embedded in one of the refs regarding opponents in the alderman race. JoelleJay (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]