Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Examples of Leet in videogaming
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mailer diablo (talk | contribs) at 03:10, 15 January 2007 (syntax). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 03:10, 15 January 2007 by Mailer diablo (talk | contribs) (syntax)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was pwn3d - D3l3t3!. - Mailer Diablo 03:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Examples of Leet in videogaming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
I usually don't think content issues warrant deletion, but this article is just a mere collection of info that may not even be real, relevant, verifiable or even interesting. Examples are used to illustrate and explain existing article, not to be a actual article by itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nanx (talk • contribs)
- Delete list of extremely trivial trivia, bordering on the dreaded "cruft". Sample entry: "WarioWare: Touched!, a place is called "Hawt House". "Hawt" is a leet spelling of hot." Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete must to trivial and arbitrary of a list.-- danntm T C 16:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Violates WP:OR. NMajdan•talk 16:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for all reasons listed above. This article was apparently split from the Leet article, which has not suffered from its removal... Venicemenace 17:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for all above reasons ::mikmt 18:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unneeded article. Darthgriz98 18:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- De-leet per nom and Starblind. Agent 86 18:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as I particularly agree with the reasoning that examples should illustrate something and not, except in rare cases, be an article unto themselves.--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 20:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete too trivial and cruft-like to merit an article. How can it continue to be expanded anyway when there are countless videogames that may contain Leet speak?¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- |>3|_373 This list shall go as the examples will become infinte and trivial. The Placebo Effect 21:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a random collection of information which will continuously grow and never be notable. Cheers, Lankybugger 21:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Violates WP:OR. --Ineffable3000 21:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Haemo 05:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.