Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of usability evaluation methods

Comparison of usability evaluation methods

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Out of scope article, that I can't really discern of classify. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a legitimate WP:stand-alone list article, and expand with more recent references. I created this article back when Wikipedia had a more accepting approach, that welcomed knowledge regardless of its format; yet even then I based it on a legitimate academic source.

Per WP:LISTN and Wikipedia:Comparison Articles and Original Research#Defence, the list is not merely a WP:SYNTH compilation written by a wikipedian, but rather the idea of comparing the validity of different usability methods has been itself the subject of studies by several independent authors [1], [2], [3], [4]. Diego (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I've added the above references to the article and written a short lede to explain the purpose and scope of the comparison list. Diego (talk) 16:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep now that sources have been added. I agree that it was quite dodgy before, and Diego Moya should probably not have waited 14 (!) years to add a few references! :) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]