Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of source-code-hosting facilities

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 02:16, 10 February 2021 (Archiving 26 discussion(s) to Talk:Comparison of source-code-hosting facilities/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconComputing List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Re-adding CodePlex entry based requirements update

CodePlex updated their project requirements page to say project requirement is compliance with the open source definition. Re-adding entry. -- jwanagel 10:54, 22 Feb 2007 (UTC)

Berlios has mercurial support

according to http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/MercurialHosting

Is xmlbasedsrs a prominent project?

This project seems dead from the 2003. You can call it prominent? The only traffic in its mailing list is spam: http://xmlbasedsrs.tigris.org/ds/viewForums.do

Launchpad forums?

As far as I know the Launchpad doesn't offer forum functionality. They have Answers which is a knowledge base type thing.

New column to feature table: Knowledge base

Some hosting facilities provide a knowledge base. For example Lauchpad has Answers.

What Determines Inclusion/Exclusion of Products?

New to Wikipedia here, what criteria do y'all use to decide whether or not to include a specific product? I'm surprised Perforce is not listed in this article. If that's intentional, why?
--MerlinRedbeard (talk) 17:52, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Entries here need to be notable and have their own article. See WP:NOTABILITY. Greenman (talk) 18:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is incorrect. Entries in this list do not need to have their own article. To quote from WP:NOTABILITY: "These guidelines only outline how suitable a topic is for its own article or list. They do not limit the content of an article or list" (Emphasis in original). Notability can be used as a criterion for inclusion in some kinds of list, the example given being lists of a school's alumni, where obviously it is appropriate. Longitude2 (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Comparison_of_source-code-hosting_facilities&oldid=1005917556"