Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of usability evaluation methods
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Comparison of usability evaluation methods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Out of scope article, that I can't really discern of classify. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as a legitimate WP:stand-alone list article, and expand with more recent references. I created this article back when Wikipedia had a more accepting approach, that welcomed knowledge regardless of its format; yet even then I based it on a legitimate academic source.
- Per WP:LISTN and Wikipedia:Comparison Articles and Original Research#Defence, the list is not merely a WP:SYNTH compilation written by a wikipedian, but rather the idea of comparing the validity of different usability methods has been itself subject of scholarship by several independent authors [1], [2], [3], [4]. Diego (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)