Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of instant messaging clients

Comparison of instant messaging clients

Comparison of instant messaging clients (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

I think that we shouldn't have this on Wikipedia. I think it's unencyclopedic and just doesn't belong here. While it is useful, this belongs on a specific website devoted to IMs, not Wikipedia   •The RSJ•   Talk | Sign Here 23:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep We have many other "comparison" articles, and I don't think this one is any worse than those I've seen in the past. There's little if any OR (contrary to the article's tagging), all of the info is verifiable, and the page contains useful encyclopedic content. -- Kicking222 00:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep-Informative, useful, and in line with other comparison articles. I fail to see exactly what is unencyclopedic about it. —Dylan Lake 01:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Kicking222 - all the contents are verifiable. Quack 688 01:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)