Template talk:Infobox data structure

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

Template

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Changing Time Complexity to Time/Space Complexity

It seems that many of the pages that use this template list both a Time and a Space Complexity.

Should we change the heading from "Time Complexity" to "Time and Space Complexities" or just "Complexity"? Pixor (talk) 01:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that, but space complexity is listed under the header "Algorithm". This is not only incorrect, but it may also be confusing because there is no explanation as to what this "space algorithm" is. I think that the best solution is to move it out of this list entirely, and put it under a new "Space complexity on big O notation" header. ―JochemvanHees (talk) 13:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe something like this? ―JochemvanHees (talk) 14:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to note amortized bounds?

Which column should they go into, and how should the difference be noted?

My current thought is to replace the "average" column with an "amortized" one when the bounds exist, as I don't know of a case where they differ significantly. Any other ideas? 104.153.72.218 (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]