„Post hoc ergo propter hoc“ – Versionsunterschied

Vorlage:About Vorlage:For Vorlage:Italic title Vorlage:Refimprove Post hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin: "after this, therefore because of this") is a logical fallacy (of the questionable cause variety) that states "Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X." It is often shortened to simply post hoc fallacy. It is subtly different from the fallacy cum hoc ergo propter hoc ("with this, therefore because of this"), in which two things or events occur simultaneously or the chronological ordering is insignificant or unknown. Post hoc is a particularly tempting error because temporal sequence appears to be integral to causality. The fallacy lies in coming to a conclusion based solely on the order of events, rather than taking into account other factors that might rule out the connection.

The following is a simple example: Vorlage:Blockquote

Pattern

The form of the post hoc fallacy can be expressed as follows:

• A occurred, then B occurred.
• Therefore, A caused B.

When B is undesirable, this pattern is often extended to the reverse: Avoiding A will prevent B.

Examples

• "I can't help thinking that you are the cause of this problem; we never had any problem with the furnace until you moved into the apartment." The manager of the apartment house, on no stated grounds other than the temporal priority of the new tenant's occupancy, holds that the tenant's presence has some causal relationship to the furnace's becoming faulty.
• In the obsolete theory of spontaneous generation, people once erroneously believed that maggots arose spontaneously from rotting meat, due to observing their presence at the site of rotting meat. Francesco Redi disproved this by using jars with lids permeable to air but not insects, compared to uncovered jars. The flies could only enter the uncovered jars and those were the only ones in which maggots appeared.
• Aluminium, barium, and strontium are being found in soil tests, and there are more airplane contrails seen in the sky. Therefore, the contrails must actually be chemtrails purposefully spraying these elements into the atmosphere.
• After smoke comes out of an electronic component, it no longer works. Therefore, the smoke was magic, and made the component work.
• The Brazilian footballer Pelé is said to have blamed a dip in form on having given a fan a specific playing shirt. Once back in possession of the shirt, he attributed his return in form to having retrieved the shirt. His fallacious reasoning was revealed by the subsequent discovery that the original shirt had not been recovered, but replaced by the same one he had worn the previous match.

Popular culture

The phrase was the title of the second episode of West Wing, the multi-Emmy Award winning drama by Aaron Sorkin.

The phrase is used by the character Sheldon Cooper in the third season of The Big Bang Theory. Sheldon uses the logical fallacy to dispute his mother's claim that her prayer group did ensure his safety during his North Pole expedition.

See also

• Correlation does not imply causation
• Confirmation bias
• Superstition
• Jumping to conclusions
• Magical thinking
• Cargo cult
• Whig history
• Apophenia

References

de:Cum hoc ergo propter hoc#post hoc ergo propter hoc (zeitliches Nacheinander)