Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Date autoformatting: Revision history

8 January 2019

• curprev 22:1722:17, 8 January 2019 Jc3s5h talk contribs m 7,662 bytes −14 Reverted 1 edit by 75.169.75.65 (talk) to last revision by SMcCandlish. (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 22:1422:14, 8 January 2019 75.169.75.65 talk 7,676 bytes +14 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

21 December 2017

• curprev 17:3717:37, 21 December 2017 SMcCandlish talk contribs 7,662 bytes +259 cleanup undo

28 December 2016

• curprev 09:2009:20, 28 December 2016 Moxy talk contribs 7,403 bytes −74 Uncategorized. ..historic page undo

15 October 2016

• curprev 02:3802:38, 15 October 2016 Jimp talk contribs 7,477 bytes +3 In "Several forms of piped links break the date-formatting function.", break → override: neutral term since you may want to do this undo

8 October 2016

• curprev 23:4423:44, 8 October 2016 Redrose64 talk contribs 7,474 bytes −28 simpler undo
• curprev 17:2817:28, 8 October 2016 Fluxbot talk contribs m 7,502 bytes +12 (Task6) HTML cleanup of Category:Pages using invalid self-closed HTML tags undo

4 May 2015

• curprev 01:2201:22, 4 May 2015 Gadget850 talk contribs 7,490 bytes −36 cleanup class "references-small" (class was deleted 21 Dec 2010) using AWB undo

2 July 2013

• curprev 09:5109:51, 2 July 2013 Redrose64 talk contribs 7,526 bytes +30 it couldn't be re-enabled even if we wanted to undo

7 April 2012

• curprev 19:5219:52, 7 April 2012 Taric25 talk contribs m 7,496 bytes +11 {{Supplement}} template syntax changed, fixing broken template undo

31 March 2012

• curprev 16:2716:27, 31 March 2012 FrescoBot talk contribs m 7,485 bytes −98 Bot: link syntax/spacing undo

12 December 2011

• curprev 16:0416:04, 12 December 2011 Lmatt talk contribs m 7,583 bytes −2 No edit summary undo
• curprev 16:0216:02, 12 December 2011 Lmatt talk contribs m 7,585 bytes 0 moved Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Date autoformatting to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Date autoformatting undo

10 July 2011

• curprev 04:0604:06, 10 July 2011 Zzyzx11 talk contribs 7,585 bytes +113 historical undo

22 May 2009

• curprev 21:1921:19, 22 May 2009 WikHead talk contribs m 7,472 bytes −3 Fixed typo, "by by" undo

18 April 2009

• curprev 21:2021:20, 18 April 2009 Dabomb87 talk contribs 7,475 bytes −27 not an article undo

17 March 2009

• curprev 10:2110:21, 17 March 2009 Ckatz talk contribs 7,502 bytes −60 Again, this is very clear; we have already defined who the prefs. work for. Keep in mind that there is a great chunk of text above this that is still heavily skewed w/opinions. undo
• curprev 10:1910:19, 17 March 2009 Ckatz talk contribs 7,562 bytes −46 This is accurate, neutral, and does not invlove unverified "small minority" claims. It is quite specific. undo
• curprev 07:0407:04, 17 March 2009 Tony1 talk contribs 7,608 bytes +101 Katz, the change in tense is unnecessary, but might be accepted in the spirit of compromise. A few instances of anodysing reverted undo
• curprev 05:0505:05, 17 March 2009 Ckatz talk contribs 7,507 bytes −99 fix tense, as the system is still active and functioning. Clean up some language. undo

19 February 2009

• curprev 22:3822:38, 19 February 2009 OlEnglish talk contribs m 7,606 bytes +1 spelling undo

7 February 2009

• curprev 14:4014:40, 7 February 2009 Dabomb87 talk contribs 7,605 bytes −21 autoformatting still works, it is just deprecated undo
• curprev 06:3606:36, 7 February 2009 Locke Cole talk contribs 7,626 bytes −2 dates undo
• curprev 06:1406:14, 7 February 2009 Ohconfucius talk contribs 7,628 bytes −4 I take Katz's point about the past tense undo
• curprev 05:5305:53, 7 February 2009 Ohconfucius talk contribs 7,632 bytes +148 Undid revision 269077169 by Ckatz per my comments undo
• curprev 05:3205:32, 7 February 2009 Ckatz talk contribs m 7,484 bytes −148 Reverted to revision 268971039 by Ckatz; a)Removing this text does not constitute "changing" anything, only saying "Leave it be until the AN/I is over please"; b) The feature still works, so it is not "disabled". undo
• curprev 04:1104:11, 7 February 2009 Dabomb87 talk contribs m 7,632 bytes +2 using en dash in date range undo
• curprev 03:1603:16, 7 February 2009 Greg L talk contribs m 7,630 bytes +25 nowrap undo
• curprev 02:1902:19, 7 February 2009 Ohconfucius talk contribs 7,605 bytes −44 Katz says it's not disabled, all I can say is 'why not???' undo
• curprev 01:5101:51, 7 February 2009 Ohconfucius talk contribs 7,649 bytes +165 rv: Ckatz is not WP:UNINVOLVED, nor is the fact that date linking is now deprecated subject to any interpretation by ARBCOM undo
• curprev 01:3001:30, 7 February 2009 Locke Cole talk contribs 7,484 bytes −119 Tony, this is still under active arbitration, it'd be best to wait undo
• curprev 01:2701:27, 7 February 2009 Tony1 talk contribs 7,603 bytes +119 No, don't start changing an established guideline just here, please undo

6 February 2009

• curprev 19:1419:14, 6 February 2009 Ckatz talk contribs m 7,484 bytes −165 Reverted to revision 268842519 by Ckatz; Given the current AN/I dispute, and the nature of this page, there is no good reason to change it right now (plus, it is not "disabled"). undo
• curprev 13:4613:46, 6 February 2009 Ohconfucius talk contribs 7,649 bytes +46 needs to be more prominent, although 'deprecation' is still not used undo
• curprev 12:4812:48, 6 February 2009 Tony1 talk contribs 7,603 bytes +119 what was wrong with that addition? Seems entirely appropriate undo
• curprev 03:1603:16, 6 February 2009 Ckatz talk contribs m 7,484 bytes −119 rv. undo
• curprev 02:0202:02, 6 February 2009 Sligocki talk contribs 7,603 bytes +119 Noted: MOS:UNLINKDATES undo

24 January 2009

• curprev 17:5117:51, 24 January 2009 Pmanderson talk contribs 7,484 bytes +6 Only one of these is a failure, the first is designed. undo

23 November 2008

• curprev 20:0520:05, 23 November 2008 Ckatz talk contribs m 7,478 bytes +27 Statistics are over two years old undo

15 November 2008

• curprev 21:4121:41, 15 November 2008 Remember the dot talk contribs 7,451 bytes −27 As of two years ago, of the millions of people that read Wikipedia, there were 151,934 user accounts total, 7,940 accounts with >5 edits, and 4,330 accounts with >100 edits, see http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaEN.htm undo
• curprev 20:4320:43, 15 November 2008 GrahamDo talk contribs 7,478 bytes +27 "vast majority" are unregistered? undo
• curprev 16:1416:14, 15 November 2008 Olaf Davis talk contribs m 7,451 bytes −66 remove redundant statement undo

12 November 2008

• curprev 19:5719:57, 12 November 2008 Psiphiorg talk contribs m 7,517 bytes −2 spacing undo

13 October 2008

• curprev 19:1119:11, 13 October 2008 Everyme talk contribs 7,519 bytes +16 catsort undo

7 October 2008

• curprev 18:4718:47, 7 October 2008 Matchups talk contribs 7,503 bytes +20 Noted termination of articles on every date as of the end of July, 2005 undo

23 September 2008

• curprev 08:1908:19, 23 September 2008 Shakescene talk contribs 7,483 bytes +338 "<code>/</code>" deleted because it produces small, ugly and hard-to-read type on my screen; other formatting selectively substituted; exception for May 15, 2005 from [May 15, 2005] noted undo
• curprev 07:0407:04, 23 September 2008 JimWae talk contribs 7,145 bytes +22 word in such a way that one can be agnostic about when YYYY-MM-DD choice started undo

22 September 2008

• curprev 09:5909:59, 22 September 2008 JimWae talk contribs 7,123 bytes +53 Autoformatting was implemented by wikilinking dates. undo
• curprev 09:2009:20, 22 September 2008 JimWae talk contribs 7,070 bytes +86 fix more tenses, expand on ISO undo
• curprev 09:0809:08, 22 September 2008 JimWae talk contribs 6,984 bytes +13 tidy tense undo