Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compiler metaprogramming example: Revision history

24 April 2006

• curprev 03:3903:39, 24 April 2006 Cydebot talk contribs m 14,254 bytes −45 Robot - Cleaning up links to extraneous VfD templates. undo

27 September 2005

• curprev 21:1121:11, 27 September 2005 Uncle G's major work 'bot talk contribs m 14,299 bytes 0 Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Compiler metaprogramming example moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compiler metaprogramming example undo

24 August 2005

• curprev 00:5800:58, 24 August 2005 Jnc talk contribs m 14,299 bytes +76 Page moved undo

18 March 2005

• curprev 21:1421:14, 18 March 2005 Deathphoenix talk contribs 14,223 bytes 0 Closing discussion: Userfy (fix the entry) undo
• curprev 21:1321:13, 18 March 2005 Deathphoenix talk contribs 14,223 bytes +941 Closing discussion: Userfy →[[Compiler metaprogramming example]] undo

14 March 2005

• curprev 16:2816:28, 14 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 13,282 bytes +273 →conclusion: if delete: please userfy, thanks! :) undo
• curprev 00:3400:34, 14 March 2005 Josh Cherry talk contribs 13,009 bytes +207 →conclusion undo

13 March 2005

• curprev 23:1823:18, 13 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 12,802 bytes +203 →conclusion: (or not so conclusion) reply to furrykef undo
• curprev 22:3422:34, 13 March 2005 Furrykef talk contribs 12,599 bytes +208 →conclusion undo
• curprev 22:1322:13, 13 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 12,391 bytes +341 →conclusion: vfd is NOT the location for POV discussion undo
• curprev 18:1618:16, 13 March 2005 Josh Cherry talk contribs 12,050 bytes +202 →conclusion undo
• curprev 17:4517:45, 13 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs m 11,848 bytes +19 ===conclusion=== undo
• curprev 17:4317:43, 13 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 11,829 bytes +619 ===conclusion=== undo

11 March 2005

• curprev 09:2509:25, 11 March 2005 Dysprosia talk contribs m 11,210 bytes +19 ++ undo
• curprev 09:2209:22, 11 March 2005 Dysprosia talk contribs 11,191 bytes +405 ******** Well, I don't necessarily agree that "all programming is metaprogramming", if that's what you mean ;) I wouldn't agree that compiler writers are doing metaprogramming, unless they are using t undo
• curprev 08:1208:12, 11 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 10,786 bytes +202 Ah! Perhaps we're in violent agreement? undo
• curprev 04:1304:13, 11 March 2005 Dysprosia talk contribs 10,584 bytes +219 ****** With the definition of metaprogramming extending to compilers, '''all''' programming is metaprogramming. The term "metaprogramming" then becomes meaningless. ~~~~ undo

10 March 2005

• curprev 23:1323:13, 10 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 10,365 bytes +221 Reply to dysprosia: Hmm, not so much "equals" as "depends on" + example undo
• curprev 22:0822:08, 10 March 2005 Dysprosia talk contribs m 10,144 bytes +685 replies. undo
• curprev 21:0321:03, 10 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 9,459 bytes +686 replies to furrykef undo
• curprev 20:0720:07, 10 March 2005 Furrykef talk contribs 8,773 bytes +575 more comments undo
• curprev 20:0020:00, 10 March 2005 Furrykef talk contribs 8,198 bytes +187 anon. votes don't count undo
• curprev 15:1915:19, 10 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 8,011 bytes −81 refactoring reply to dysprosia undo
• curprev 15:0615:06, 10 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 8,092 bytes +211 reply to dysprosia: incorrect assumption undo
• curprev 13:3613:36, 10 March 2005 192.176.33.6 talk 7,881 bytes +79 →[[Compiler metaprogramming example]]: Delete. undo
• curprev 08:2808:28, 10 March 2005 Dysprosia talk contribs m 7,802 bytes +211 ******* You're still missing the point. You ''don't write'' the compiler, you merely execute it. Executing programs is not programming. Writing programs is. ~~~~ undo
• curprev 08:0708:07, 10 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 7,591 bytes +175 answer to Dysprosia: A 4GL compiler does exactly that! undo
• curprev 05:4005:40, 10 March 2005 Dysprosia talk contribs 7,416 bytes +453 ***** No, I don't believe I did make a typo, and you did not copy what I had wrote verbatim. I shall clarify. Metaprogramming, as far as I can see, is ''writing'' a program ''whose intended output is undo

9 March 2005

• curprev 23:4623:46, 9 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs m 6,963 bytes 0 (replying to Dysprosia, assuming he made a thinko) caps: s->S undo
• curprev 23:4423:44, 9 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs m 6,963 bytes 0 (replying to disprosia, assuming (s)he made a thinko) ! -> . undo
• curprev 23:4123:41, 9 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 6,963 bytes +341 Disprosia, was that a thinko? undo
• curprev 21:2121:21, 9 March 2005 Dysprosia talk contribs m 6,622 bytes +218 *** But what the page describes isn't really metaprogramming. Metaprogramming is really writing a program that writes code, not using the compiler to generate code. ~~~~ undo
• curprev 18:5318:53, 9 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 6,404 bytes −191 (-1 paragraph of answer, better not to promise stuff before I know it'll work ) undo
• curprev 18:5118:51, 9 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 6,595 bytes +888 →[[Compiler metaprogramming example]] undo
• curprev 17:0217:02, 9 March 2005 Furrykef talk contribs 5,707 bytes +712 another response to Kim undo
• curprev 12:5312:53, 9 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 4,995 bytes +131 tidying comment undo
• curprev 12:4712:47, 9 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 4,864 bytes +417 →[[Compiler metaprogramming example]] undo
• curprev 09:3209:32, 9 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 4,447 bytes +881 replies to Dysprosia and furrykef undo
• curprev 05:2605:26, 9 March 2005 Dysprosia talk contribs m 3,566 bytes +148 *'''Delete'''. Pointless. Merely mention of a disassembly flag on a compiler should be enough. ~~~~ undo
• curprev 05:1905:19, 9 March 2005 Josh Cherry talk contribs 3,418 bytes +184 →[[Compiler metaprogramming example]] undo
• curprev 04:5204:52, 9 March 2005 Furrykef talk contribs m 3,234 bytes −31 No edit summary undo
• curprev 04:5104:51, 9 March 2005 Furrykef talk contribs 3,265 bytes +1,443 →[[Compiler metaprogramming example]] undo

8 March 2005

• curprev 21:3321:33, 8 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 1,822 bytes +124 Comment: reverted metaprogrammng undo
• curprev 20:0820:08, 8 March 2005 Kim Bruning talk contribs 1,698 bytes +483 No fair ;-) Page on vfd while author on wikivacation! :-P undo
• curprev 17:2217:22, 8 March 2005 David Gerard talk contribs 1,215 bytes +113 →[[Compiler metaprogramming example]] undo
• curprev 06:5106:51, 8 March 2005 Deathphoenix talk contribs 1,102 bytes +277 Delete →[[Compiler metaprogramming example]] undo

4 March 2005

• curprev 09:4809:48, 4 March 2005 Radiant! talk contribs 825 bytes +116 →[[Compiler metaprogramming example]] undo
• curprev 02:2402:24, 4 March 2005 Furrykef talk contribs m 709 bytes −3 typo (on my part (for once)) undo
• curprev 00:1700:17, 4 March 2005 Josh Cherry talk contribs 712 bytes +197 →[[Compiler metaprogramming example]] undo

3 March 2005

• curprev 23:0523:05, 3 March 2005 Furrykef talk contribs 515 bytes +515 No edit summary