Jump to content

User:RogDel/Significant coverage not required: Revision history

View logs for this page (view filter log)

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 14:4614:46, 21 February 2024 Wbm1058 talk contribs 3,865 bytes +8 restore the shortcut to the essay template undo

curprev 17:2317:23, 4 February 2024 SnowFire talk contribs m 3,857 bytes 0 SnowFire moved page Wikipedia:Significant coverage not required to User:RogDel/Significant coverage not required: Boldly userfy per talk. Very fringe opinion by a long-departed user that has not acquired significant uptake or discussion - more a userspace essay than a Wikipedia-space one. undo

curprev 13:5713:57, 10 October 2022 Jtrrs0 talk contribs 3,857 bytes +21 Added a template to make clear this is not current policy or guidance undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

curprev 06:2306:23, 23 July 2020 Scarpy talk contribs 3,836 bytes 0 I believe this is posed as a question undo

curprev 07:2307:23, 12 July 2019 Cydebot talk contribs m 3,836 bytes +2 Robot - Moving category Wikipedia essays on notability to Category:Wikipedia essays about notability per CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 7. undo

curprev 04:3704:37, 3 November 2018 John M Wolfson talk contribs 3,834 bytes −8 Fixed template undo

curprev 08:2008:20, 7 February 2016 James500 talk contribs 3,842 bytes +8 Template. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 02:1702:17, 9 October 2015 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 3,834 bytes +434 →Why the requirement of significant coverage should not be a criterion for notability: since bringing up the Three Blind Mice band, which WP:N is "trivial" is an attempt to debate WP:N, the essay should make this plain undo

curprev 02:0902:09, 31 August 2015 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 3,400 bytes +40 →Why the requirement of significant coverage should not be a criterion for notability: parabrk undo

curprev 02:4402:44, 3 January 2015 NinjaRobotPirate talk contribs 3,360 bytes 0 Per H:DL, don't use semicolons to bold text. It creates invalid HTML. undo
curprev 01:3401:34, 3 January 2015 Enterprisey talk contribs m 3,360 bytes 0 Reverted edits by APerson (talk) to last version by James500 undo
curprev 01:3401:34, 3 January 2015 Enterprisey talk contribs 3,360 bytes 0 change abuse of dd-list to a section header undo

curprev 16:3216:32, 28 October 2014 James500 talk contribs 3,360 bytes +7 Shortcut undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 06:5806:58, 22 April 2014 James500 talk contribs 3,353 bytes +168 expand undo Tag: Mobile edit

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RogDel/Significant_coverage_not_required"