Jump to content

SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

26 June 2025

20 May 2025

3 September 2024

1 August 2024

20 July 2024

8 March 2024

14 February 2024

13 February 2024

6 December 2023

4 December 2023

18 September 2023

28 May 2023

16 April 2023

12 February 2023

  • curprev 23:0823:08, 12 February 2023 2a02:c7c:5d01:1d00:c149:f14e:fc70:b99 talk 13,705 bytes −4 Corrected "judgement" for "judgment" when referring to decisions of the High Court of England and Wales and CJEU. An example of this correct usage is seen in the quote from Paragraph 82 of [2013] EWHC 69 (Ch). undo
  • curprev 23:0323:03, 12 February 2023 2a02:c7c:5d01:1d00:c149:f14e:fc70:b99 talk 13,709 bytes +21 Judges of the High Court of England and Wales are properly referred to as "Mr Justice [Surname]" or "Mrs Justice [Surname]" as the case may be, not simply as "Justice [Surname]". "Justice Arnold" was therefore incorrect. "Pumfrey J" is a proper abbreviation of Mr Justice Pumfrey, but for consistency the same approach to using a judge's full title has also been adopted for him. undo

22 April 2022

25 November 2021

8 October 2021

2 October 2019

5 August 2019

2 March 2019

5 September 2018

11 March 2017

29 June 2016

3 May 2016

25 April 2016

9 March 2016

12 February 2016

20 December 2015

23 November 2015

13 October 2015

12 October 2015

15 March 2015

4 December 2014

25 July 2014

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)