Proposed further Welsh devolution: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 05:4505:45, 28 May 2025 OAbot talk contribs m 35,694 bytes +25 Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot. undo

curprev 15:2315:23, 22 January 2024 Sionk talk contribs 35,520 bytes −724 →Entrenched devolution: not a proposal, in fact paragraph is about something that isn't being proposed undo
curprev 15:2015:20, 22 January 2024 Sionk talk contribs 36,244 bytes −1,229 →Confederation: clearly not a proposal and no evidence of it being on the table undo
curprev 14:0514:05, 22 January 2024 Sionk talk contribs 37,473 bytes +58 →References: +See also undo

curprev 23:3523:35, 15 December 2023 ThatRandomGuy1 talk contribs 37,415 bytes +611 →Rail infrastructure: Added info about UK Gov devolution offer rejected by Welsh Gov in 2005 undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 18:5918:59, 8 September 2023 DankJae talk contribs 36,853 bytes +59 This is better? "Proposals for more autonomy to Wales", debating whether the title is enough already. undo Tag: Shortdesc helper
curprev 18:5718:57, 8 September 2023 DankJae talk contribs 36,794 bytes −113 Undid revision 1174482956 by Maxeto0910 (talk) Wayyy to long per WP:SDLENGTH, has to be shorter (~40 characters). Cannot think of one, so possible WP:SDNONE, as title may be enough. undo Tag: Undo
curprev 18:2918:29, 8 September 2023 Maxeto0910 talk contribs 36,907 bytes +113 Added short description. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 02:4902:49, 8 May 2023 Titus Gold talk contribs 34,496 bytes +3,507 →Crown Estate: expanded section undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 00:2800:28, 8 May 2023 DankJae talk contribs 30,989 bytes +29 add tag, while a few sentences on alternative views, wholly pro-devolution proposals. Ofc, I expect there not to be so much responses as these proposals are not mainstream, but at least for HS2 the UK Government did respond and should be included. Readers must be given some explanation why these proposals, claimed to be so supported, are not adopted or how the existing system came to be, if possible. undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor