Jump to content

Particular values of the Riemann zeta function: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

28 March 2025

21 January 2025

19 January 2025

11 January 2025

8 January 2025

19 November 2024

29 October 2024

14 September 2024

23 August 2024

18 June 2024

5 March 2024

15 November 2023

12 October 2023

29 September 2023

12 July 2023

15 April 2023

9 April 2023

8 April 2023

16 March 2023

  • curprev 15:5215:52, 16 March 2023 2603:8080:6b0f:7ec:88e5:bdcd:77e0:584f talk 23,634 bytes +56 The reference I added shows the sign is + not -. The reason I double checked is the way the two equations are written you could subtract the two and see there is a redundant formula in there for pi (isolate the second term in each identify for zeta(5) to have a factor of two and subtract the two equations from each other). Either way - reference shows the sign change. undo

6 March 2023

26 October 2022

21 October 2022

13 September 2022

7 September 2022

4 August 2022

30 July 2022

6 July 2022

29 November 2021

4 November 2021

27 October 2021

31 May 2021

30 May 2021

29 May 2021

10 May 2021

21 March 2021

20 March 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)