Jump to content

Negative consequentialism: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

2 March 2025

  • curprev 14:1614:16, 2 March 2025 Mat Rozas talk contribs m 13,926 bytes +1 Apologists: Fixed a missing '.' I forgot. Woops. undo
  • curprev 14:1414:14, 2 March 2025 Mat Rozas talk contribs 13,925 bytes +10 Apologists: Fixed some weird phrasing, and created paragraph separations to improve readibility. Also, I don't think it's justified to relate Mayerfeld's and Pearce's ideas in the way they are related in the current iteration of the page. I'm thus going to separate them, as it feels like it improves readibility and is a fairer representation of the thought of both philosophers. undo
  • curprev 13:3413:34, 2 March 2025 Mat Rozas talk contribs m 13,915 bytes −202 Eliminating McMahan's reference. It feels unnecessary, as both Rozas and Benatar explain what's the asymmetry in their work already, and including it as a reference may mislead people into thinking that McMahan himself endorsed the idea that NU is a good account of the PA when he didn't. undo

17 February 2025

16 February 2025

14 February 2025

  • curprev 16:0816:08, 14 February 2025 196.150.153.206 talk 13,396 bytes −525 Removed paragraph that made dubious claims about an intuition that most of us allegedly have. See Caviola 2022 for a study that shows that majority of the people actually have the opposite intuition from the one that was claimed. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

20 December 2023

6 August 2023

26 June 2023

2 June 2023

2 February 2023

12 February 2022

23 August 2021

5 February 2021

29 January 2021

3 January 2021

19 December 2020

17 October 2020

23 August 2020

22 August 2020

20 August 2020

14 July 2020

  • curprev 06:5206:52, 14 July 2020 Mat Rozas talk contribs 11,440 bytes −1 "...calculations... becomes unecessary..." calculations = plural, becomes = singular 3rd person form. Corrected the typo related with this grammar since becomes references the verb calculations i.e. in my new version = "calculations become unecessary..." undo

6 March 2020

11 August 2019

17 June 2019

23 December 2017

5 May 2016

29 April 2016

18 March 2016

17 March 2016

27 October 2015

26 October 2015

16 October 2015

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)