Guy Ritchie's unrealized projects: Revision history

22 May 2025

• curprev 22:3622:36, 22 May 2025 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 29,180 bytes +1,154 →2000s: Adding refs
• curprev 22:2522:25, 22 May 2025 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 28,026 bytes +909 →Sgt. Rock
• curprev 22:2322:23, 22 May 2025 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 27,117 bytes +3,217 →Sgt. Rock: Expanding
• curprev 22:1222:12, 22 May 2025 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 23,900 bytes +4,850 →Aladdin sequel: Adding
• curprev 22:0922:09, 22 May 2025 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 19,050 bytes −34 →Untitled third Sherlock Holmes film
• curprev 22:0822:08, 22 May 2025 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 19,084 bytes +485 →Untitled third Sherlock Holmes film
• curprev 22:0722:07, 22 May 2025 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 18,599 bytes +5,586 →Untitled third Sherlock Holmes film

26 March 2025

• curprev 06:0406:04, 26 March 2025 Mjks28 talk contribs 13,013 bytes +206 + templates Tag: Visual edit

20 December 2024

• curprev 10:1310:13, 20 December 2024 GhostInTheMachine talk contribs 12,807 bytes −17 Set Short description to none — WP:SDNONE Tag: Shortdesc helper

29 November 2024

• curprev 01:5101:51, 29 November 2024 BattyBot talk contribs m 12,824 bytes 0 Fixed citation parameters so name is displayed per MOS:JUNIOR, performed general fixes Tag: AWB

12 November 2024

• curprev 18:2318:23, 12 November 2024 Ivanvector talk contribs 12,824 bytes +22 Adding {{pp-sock}} Tag: Twinkle
• curprev 18:2318:23, 12 November 2024 Ivanvector talk contribs m 12,802 bytes 0 Protected "Guy Ritchie's unrealized projects": Persistent sock puppetry ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 18:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC))) Tag: Twinkle
• curprev 18:2218:22, 12 November 2024 Ivanvector talk contribs 12,802 bytes +865 Restored revision 1257006573 by MSLQr (talk): Rv block evasion Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 18:2018:20, 12 November 2024 92.30.65.68 talk 11,937 bytes −865 Undid revision 1257006573 by MSLQr (talk) not to be rude sorry. Tags: Undo Reverted references removed
• curprev 18:1918:19, 12 November 2024 MSLQr talk contribs m 12,802 bytes +865 Reverted edits by 92.30.65.68 (talk) (AV) Tags: AntiVandal Rollback Reverted
• curprev 18:1818:18, 12 November 2024 92.30.65.68 talk 11,937 bytes −865 No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Reverted references removed Visual edit

4 November 2024

• curprev 18:3818:38, 4 November 2024 Lavalizard101 talk contribs 12,802 bytes +865 Undid revision 1255391717 by 2.98.157.204 (talk) rv disruptive editing Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 18:3518:35, 4 November 2024 2.98.157.204 talk 11,937 bytes −865 Undid revision 1254840764 by Lavalizard101 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted references removed

1 November 2024

• curprev 23:3623:36, 1 November 2024 Lavalizard101 talk contribs 12,802 bytes +865 Undid revision 1254840306 by 2.98.157.204 (talk) speculation being false =/= the source reporting on speculation is lying Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 23:3223:32, 1 November 2024 2.98.157.204 talk 11,937 bytes −865 Undid revision 1254839724 by Rasteem (talk) not vandlizing if it's removing something that is a lie. no sources that are proven have been proven and last i checked they don't even mention the supposed news. i did explain myself in all fairness it's more you lots problem Tags: Undo Reverted references removed
• curprev 23:2823:28, 1 November 2024 Rasteem talk contribs 12,802 bytes +865 Reverted 1 edit by 2.98.157.204 (talk): Reason? Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
• curprev 23:2523:25, 1 November 2024 2.98.157.204 talk 11,937 bytes −865 Undid revision 1254830770 by Lavalizard101 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted references removed
• curprev 22:1422:14, 1 November 2024 Lavalizard101 talk contribs 12,802 bytes +865 Undid revision 1254829543 by 2.98.157.204 (talk) we are an encyclopedia the articles can talk about speculation (as long as its noted that it was speculation as the phrase "reportedly in talks" does) Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 22:0422:04, 1 November 2024 2.98.157.204 talk 11,937 bytes −865 Undid revision 1254824630 by Lavalizard101 (talk) 'it just means there has been speculation' is exactly why i am removing it cos it's speculation as you just said and this is wikipedia not a fan website we have a reposibilty to uphold actual news not some speculation. honestly you just helped me, thanks for that Tags: Undo Reverted references removed
• curprev 21:3521:35, 1 November 2024 Lavalizard101 talk contribs 12,802 bytes +865 Undid revision 1254822710 by 2.98.157.204 (talk) "reportedly in talks" does not mean that they are in talks to get the role, it just means there has been speculation, the speculation being reported on being wrong in the =/= the source being unreliable Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 21:2421:24, 1 November 2024 2.98.157.204 talk 11,937 bytes −865 Undid revision 1254816395 by Lavalizard101 (talk) and they are normally accurtate 0 times out of 10 so there Tags: Undo Reverted references removed
• curprev 20:4520:45, 1 November 2024 Lavalizard101 talk contribs 12,802 bytes +865 Undid revision 1254809494 by 2.98.157.204 (talk) as it says "reportedly in talks" these sources are reporting it Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 20:0420:04, 1 November 2024 2.98.157.204 talk 11,937 bytes −865 Undid revision 1252490036 by Lavalizard101 (talk) i concur with 92 whatever the users name is. sorry for u it is unreliable Tags: Undo Reverted references removed

21 October 2024

• curprev 15:5615:56, 21 October 2024 Lavalizard101 talk contribs 12,802 bytes +865 Undid revision 1247756284 by 92.30.68.161 (talk) nope the sources are not unreliable Tags: Undo Reverted

25 September 2024

• curprev 20:5020:50, 25 September 2024 92.30.68.161 talk 11,937 bytes −865 Sorry, don't mean to be a mean to be a pain in the neck but I'm afraid those are from unreliable sources. Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit

22 September 2024

• curprev 15:4215:42, 22 September 2024 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 12,802 bytes +341 →2010s Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

3 September 2024

• curprev 04:0204:02, 3 September 2024 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 12,461 bytes +311 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 03:5603:56, 3 September 2024 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 12,150 bytes +573 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

2 September 2024

• curprev 17:2217:22, 2 September 2024 Lavalizard101 talk contribs 11,577 bytes +2 →Hercules remake
• curprev 17:2117:21, 2 September 2024 Lavalizard101 talk contribs 11,575 bytes +863 no evidence presented that the first source made it up, heck I just found this https://thedisinsider.com/2024/05/23/the-disinsider-boardwalk-times-mailbag-hercules-pirates-moana/ which confirms Ariana is being considered for Meg as well as a buzzingpop tweet
• curprev 10:1410:14, 2 September 2024 2.97.214.7 talk 10,712 bytes −244 Secondly, you’re 2nd source that you are trying to use as a way to back up your claims is an article from 2022 and your writing it as though it was reported in 2023 which it was not (by any trusted and reliable outlets anyway) Tags: Manual revert references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 10:1110:11, 2 September 2024 2.97.214.7 talk 10,956 bytes −569 Now that I’m doing laughing let me explain why shall I? 1. Your first source “reporting the casting” is an unproven website that does nothing more than take fan speculation and casting and try to make fake headlines out of it just ask wegotthiscovered they do it all the time. When it’s the studio, the director, cast, any news outlet like THR, deadline, variety etc that is proven to be trusted and reliable then the information becomes noteworthy and trusted. Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 09:5509:55, 2 September 2024 Lavalizard101 talk contribs 11,525 bytes +813 Undid revision 1243485592 by 2.97.214.7 (talk) rv personal attack filled removal of sourced info Tags: Undo Reverted

1 September 2024

• curprev 19:0419:04, 1 September 2024 2.97.214.7 talk 10,712 bytes −813 Improper sources lol I’m actually pissingmyself laughing you know why? https://www.tomatazos.com/noticias/856807/Taron-Egerton-y-Ariana-Grande-podrian-interpretar-a-Hercules-y-Megara-en-el-remake-liveaction-de-Hercules Oh wait there’s more https://www.heart.co.uk/lifestyle/disney/hercules-live-action-remake-director-guy-ritchie/ catch my drift you lot are the biggest idiots I’ve ever seen and I’ve encountered Adamstom.97 and you make him look smart. Lol biggest dummies around hahaha. Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 August 2024

• curprev 04:1404:14, 28 August 2024 Swinub talk contribs m 11,525 bytes −1 →The Dirty Dozen remake: Grammar

18 August 2024

• curprev 19:2819:28, 18 August 2024 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 11,526 bytes +582 →2000s Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 19:2419:24, 18 August 2024 ZanderAlbatraz1145 talk contribs 10,944 bytes +1,667 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

26 April 2024

• curprev 17:3517:35, 26 April 2024 Citation bot talk contribs 9,277 bytes −60 Alter: title, template type. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine

10 April 2024

• curprev 20:2320:23, 10 April 2024 2601:4a:4201:af0:ba53:45bb:3ecb:e277 talk 9,337 bytes +1,336 2 sections had to be updated.
• curprev 19:3119:31, 10 April 2024 2601:4a:4201:af0:ba53:45bb:3ecb:e277 talk 8,001 bytes +505 More information had to be added.

15 February 2024

• curprev 17:2917:29, 15 February 2024 The Film Creator talk contribs 7,496 bytes +1 →External links Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 00:0000:00, 15 February 2024 67.40.201.7 talk 7,495 bytes 0 →External links Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 00:0000:00, 15 February 2024 67.40.201.7 talk 7,495 bytes −1 →2000s Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

14 February 2024

• curprev 23:5923:59, 14 February 2024 67.40.201.7 talk 7,496 bytes −1 →2010s Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 23:5823:58, 14 February 2024 67.40.201.7 talk 7,497 bytes +36 →References Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit