Jump to content

First-order logic: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

7 May 2025

5 May 2025

4 May 2025

3 May 2025

2 May 2025

7 April 2025

3 April 2025

3 March 2025

24 February 2025

7 February 2025

4 February 2025

31 December 2024

28 December 2024

14 December 2024

26 November 2024

25 November 2024

11 October 2024

16 September 2024

7 September 2024

4 September 2024

3 September 2024

  • curprev 16:4216:42, 3 September 2024 173.13.91.9 talk 94,986 bytes −1 I already explained in the talk section that "Socrates is a man" is not an existentially quantified (or any sort of quantified) formula in first-order logic. It's a simple predicate and should jsut be Ms (Mx = "x is a man" and s = Socrates... we don't need a variable since we know the term... SOCRATES IS THE MAN). Also, as I already mentioned, this is exactly what the source citing the improper formulation notes as well. So I changed the example to an actually quantified formula. undo Tag: Visual edit

26 August 2024

16 August 2024

9 August 2024

30 July 2024

26 July 2024

23 July 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)