Anelastic attenuation factor: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 11:5011:50, 5 March 2021 213.135.33.97 talk 5,605 bytes +211 →Quality factor, Q: The reverse is true, acording e.g. to J. Geophys. Eng. 10 (2013) 045012 (8pp) doi:10.1088/1742-2132/10/4/045012 Attenuation (1/Q) estimation in reflection seismic records Wasiu Raji1,2 and Andreas Rietbrock2 undo

curprev 04:3104:31, 22 May 2018 BorisG talk contribs 5,392 bytes +312 →Spectral ratio methodTonn, R. 1991. The determination of seismic quality factors Q from VSP data: A comparison of different computational methods. Geophys. Prosp. 39, 1-27.: bias in Q estimates for frequency dependent Q undo
curprev 04:2204:22, 22 May 2018 BorisG talk contribs 5,080 bytes −138 deleted an erroneous sentence. Whose behaviour? Dispersion is variation of VELOCITY with frequency. Materials with finite Q are dispersive because of causality principle, not because Q depends on frequency. undo

curprev 05:5305:53, 21 May 2018 BorisG talk contribs 5,218 bytes 0 correcting an obvious math error undo

curprev 11:4511:45, 6 September 2013 Kwinkunks talk contribs 4,438 bytes +213 some gardening; dispensed with Introduction and put in lede; distinguish between attenuation factor and Q (they're different) undo

curprev 16:4416:44, 14 February 2012 Joaquin008 talk contribs m 4,174 bytes −2 →Why Measure Q?: fix undo
curprev 16:4016:40, 14 February 2012 Rocksandwaves talk contribs 4,176 bytes +4,176 I've started the article with as much info as I can think of right now.