View source for Wikipedia talk:Developing Countries WikiContest/Archive 1

{{Automatic archive navigator}}

== Criteria ==

How will we determine which articles are mostly about developing countries and which aren't. Obviously places and some biographies are pretty obvious, but what about albums, books, concepts, species, etc.? What about a Western-born person with parents born in a developing country? What about an article about a historical figure who's country, present day, spans a developed and a non-developed country? 

Also, should we give more weight to articles more directly about the country? For example, an article is created about a current Peruvian politician vs a book by a Peruvian-born American author? There should probably be some sort of criteria so editors aren't confused about it. — [[User:PerfectSoundWhatever|<span style="letter-spacing:0.1em;">PerfectSoundWhatever</span>]] ([[User talk:PerfectSoundWhatever|t]]; [[Special:Contributions/PerfectSoundWhatever|c]]) 02:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

:this is a great question - currently, my idea is that all articles related to a country are worth the same, with bonuses for more "high-level" country-related articles, such as "history of" or "religion in" articles, and an even higher bonus for the actual countries' articles. however, we need to iron out more tangential cases like you mention <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 02:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:I think this would boil down to defining the scope of the contest as "Global South (broadly construed)" and leaving the edge cases up to judges' discretion. Might be worth an instruction on the submissions page to check beforehand with a judge if they're unsure? <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 02:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

== General planning thread ==

Feel free to brainstorm logistical details here! <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 01:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

=== Who's coming to the party? ===
July is going to come a lot faster than one might think. It might be worth reaching out to editors and asking for RSVPs as soon as possible, as that will likely significantly impact how the contest is organized. [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] and [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|Sawyer-mcdonell]], thoughts? <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 01:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

:i think let's give this thread a few days to ruminate & develop some concrete ideas, and then definitely <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 02:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{+1}}; [[WP:VPIL]] is probably a good first place. <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 02:40, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

== Some preliminary thoughts ==

* It would help to have a full list of countries instead of just the map. Even if you know where the countries are on the map, the islands are difficult to tell apart.
* Should we consider including some of the "no data" countries on a case-by-case basis? We shouldn't reject articles about Cuba or North Korea, for example, just because of a technicality.
* I don't like that "Winter" is included in the title just to teach people a lesson. Being intentionally confusing and [[WP:POINT]]y is not inviting, especially since Eastern Europe, Central America, the Caribbean, the majority of Africa, and nearly all of Asia are in the northern hemisphere.
* How will the multipliers work? So far I'm assuming it's just the "least developed" multiplier mentioned above. There was talk of having more points for "core" articles for each country, and I've made a list of such core articles at [[Wikipedia:Sample country outline]]. I imagine we're not going to use an inter-wiki multiplier since that would incentivize people to stick with the developing countries that already have good inter-wiki coverage.
* It would be a good idea to get a third judge who has some experience with this sort of thing or has been on Wikipedia for a while. Most of us who are involved so far only have a couple years of Wikipedia experience at most. Having an old hand involved will significantly increase the chances of this getting off the ground and running smoothly.
* And most important of all, FAs can take over a month to process and GAs often take several times that. It might help that contestants will specifically be seeking out reviews for these countries, but we need to be more proactive or the three one-month rounds system might not work. For starters, I suggest something like [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews needed]] but placed prominently right on the contest page itself. {{small|[[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#324717">The</span><span style="color:#45631f">big</span><span style="color:#547826">ugly</span><span style="color:#68942f">alien</span>]] ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:sienna">talk</span>]]) 03:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)}}
[[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#324717">The</span><span style="color:#45631f">big</span><span style="color:#547826">ugly</span><span style="color:#68942f">alien</span>]] ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:sienna">talk</span>]]) 02:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

:I've whipped up a list based on the map's sources, I'll move it to a subpage if no one objects.
{{cot|indent=1.7em}}
; "Emerging and developing"
{{divcol}}
* Albania
* Algeria
* Antigua and Barbuda
* Argentina
* Armenia
* Aruba
* Azerbaijan
* The Bahamas
* Bahrain
* Barbados
* Belarus
* Belize
* Benin
* Bhutan
* Bolivia
* Bosnia and Herzegovina
* Botswana
* Brazil
* Brunei
* Bulgaria
* Burkina Faso
* Cabo Verde
* Cameroon
* Chile
* China
* Colombia
* Republic of Congo
* Costa Rica
* Côte d'Ivoire
* Dominica
* Dominican Republic
* Ecuador
* Egypt
* El Salvador
* Equatorial Guinea
* Eswatini
* Fiji
* Gabon
* Georgia
* Ghana
* Grenada
* Guatemala
* Guyana
* Honduras
* Hungary
* India
* Indonesia
* Iran
* Iraq
* Jamaica
* Jordan
* Kazakhstan
* Kenya
* Kosovo
* Kuwait
* Kyrgyzstan
* Lebanon
* Libya
* Malaysia
* Maldives
* Marshall Islands
* Mauritius
* Mexico
* Micronesia
* Moldova
* Mongolia
* Montenegro
* Morocco
* Namibia
* Nauru
* Nicaragua
* Nigeria
* North Macedonia
* Oman
* Pakistan
* Palau
* Panama
* Papua New Guinea
* Paraguay
* Peru
* Philippines
* Poland
* Qatar
* Romania
* Russia
* Samoa
* Saudi Arabia
* Serbia
* Seychelles
* South Africa
* Sri Lanka
* St. Kitts and Nevis
* St. Lucia
* St. Vincent and the Grenadines
* Suriname
* Syria
* Tajikistan
* Thailand
* Tonga
* Trinidad and Tobago
* Tunisia
* Türkiye
* Turkmenistan
* Ukraine
* United Arab Emirates
* Uruguay
* Uzbekistan
* Vanuatu
* Venezuela
* Vietnam
* "West Bank and Gaza"
* Zimbabwe
{{divcolend}}
; "Least developed"
{{divcol}}
* Afghanistan
* Angola
* Bangladesh
* Benin
* Burundi
* Cambodia
* Central African Republic
* Chad
* Comoros
* Democratic Republic of the Congo
* Djibouti
* Eritrea
* Ethiopia
* The Gambia
* Guinea
* Guinea-Bissau
* Haiti
* Kiribati
* Laos
* Lesotho
* Liberia
* Madagascar
* Malawi
* Mali
* Mauritania
* Mozambique
* Myanmar
* Nepal
* Niger
* Rwanda
* São Tomé and Príncipe
* Senegal
* Sierra Leone
* Solomon Islands
* Somalia
* South Sudan
* Sudan
* Timor-Leste
* Togo
* Tuvalu
* Uganda
* Tanzania
* Yemen
* Zambia
{{divcolend}}
{{cob}}
:<sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 03:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::We can incorporate the "no data" countries into their own section that says "These countries have not been assessed by the IMF or UN, but are deemed eligible for points" or something like that. <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 03:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::Sorry for so many replies, but I agree with removing "winter". That made sense in the original plans, where we used an arbitrary "global north/global south" map, but now that we're using this (much better) map, it doesn't make sense. <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 04:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:a couple things - will get to more later:
:im not particularly attached to the winter-summer name scheme. i think it's fun, but i see your POINT point. courtesy pinging @[[User:Generalissima|Generalissima]]
:thanks for linking your "core" articles list - that will be very helpful. and i agree we should do away with the interwiki bonuses in favor of the new ones we've come up with. 
:i also see your point about the FAC length issue - i'm amenable to either having one single 3 month round, or extending the rounds, or some other solution. i also agree that we should display the "reviews needed" prominently. 
:regarding the "no data" countries - most of them are, unsurprisingly, lacking coverage on wikipedia due to WP:BIAS so i would be cool with a case-by-case basis. we probably shouldn't count vatican city, but we should absolutely count the DPRK, for example. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 03:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:Some thoughts: I agree with dropping the "Winter" simply because shorter names are easier to remember. There isn't a need to differentiate between another contest with the same name this year.
:I also think a single 3-month round would work fine.
:We could also consider using the [[List of countries by Human Development Index|Human Development Index]] instead. We could only look at countries considered High development or worse (HDI ≤ .799), giving us about 123 countries. — [[User:PerfectSoundWhatever|<span style="letter-spacing:0.1em;">PerfectSoundWhatever</span>]] ([[User talk:PerfectSoundWhatever|t]]; [[Special:Contributions/PerfectSoundWhatever|c]]) 04:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::there was some discussion about how we're counting countries that are "no data" - HDI could be a great supplemental measure for this purpose i think <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 17:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::I also think a single three-month round would work better. Less chance of unlucky DYK/GAN/FAC promotions. [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 18:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

===rounds===
putting this in a new subsection so it's easier to find: currently we've got 3 month-long rounds, but above we've got some legit concerns about how long the FAC & other content review processes are. what are our thoughts on having rounds? should we switch to one 3-month round? <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 18:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:Makes sense to me, especially since this is a brand-new event. I think it might be beneficial to incentivize as much contribution to the contest as possible by eliminating eliminations. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 18:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::i agree - pinging @[[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] 4 their thoughts <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 19:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:::If the majority is in favor then sure. — ♠[[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[Non nobis solum]]. </small>♠ 00:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{+1}}, although maybe I'm just salty I got eliminated from WikiCup because of a DYK running one day late. <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 19:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:Yeah, sounds good — [[User:PerfectSoundWhatever|<span style="letter-spacing:0.1em;">PerfectSoundWhatever</span>]] ([[User talk:PerfectSoundWhatever|t]]; [[Special:Contributions/PerfectSoundWhatever|c]]) 19:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

== countries & territories not included on our map ==

on the main map we're using, there are a number of countries marked grey (not mentioned by the sources of the map) so i think we should outline which of those countries will count for our purposes. [https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wesp/wesp_current/2014wesp_country_classification.pdf this UN report] includes a number of non-sovereign territories. i'm going to add these territories to the scoring (probably in a different section, for now) assuming there's no objection. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
:i found a better source for the SIDS list so i've updated it accordingly <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:55, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
:i have added some more information about edge cases, territories, etc. anyone feel free to suggest changes here. pinging @[[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] for their opinion here <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 23:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{Like}}, {{u|sawyer-mcdonell}}. — ♠[[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[Non nobis solum]]. </small>♠ 23:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

== Additional weight to "least developed" countries ==
{{atopg
| status = implemented
| result = i'll close it formally since qoh won't.... any additional comments can go in a new section <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 04:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
}}


Unanimous consensus and has been implemented, although I won't formally close it. <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 04:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
----
On the map, it has "developing" and "least developed" countries. Will/should the "least developed" get a multiplier-like bonus? <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 01:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:'''Support''' the idea, not decided on what the bonus would be. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 01:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:'''Support''' - Countries highlighted in darker colors should be given more bonus points in my opinion [[User:Arconning|Arconning]] ([[User talk:Arconning|talk]]) 02:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:'''support''' <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 02:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:Sounds good, maybe a 1.5x multiplier? — [[User:PerfectSoundWhatever|<span style="letter-spacing:0.1em;">PerfectSoundWhatever</span>]] ([[User talk:PerfectSoundWhatever|t]]; [[Special:Contributions/PerfectSoundWhatever|c]]) 02:12, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::1.5x is fine for me. <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 02:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:'''Support'''. A 1.5x multiplier sounds good. [[User:Ghosts of Europa|Ghosts of Europa]] ([[User talk:Ghosts of Europa|talk]]) 02:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}

== Scoring ==

I made [[ Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Scoring]] based on what I've read on this talk page. Please provide suggestions as subthreads to this one so we can keep the talk page easy to navigate through and make proposals easier to discuss/enact. Differences to the WikiCup I've made: removed interwiki bonuses, added bonuses for country and second-level country articles with additional bonuses for least developed countries. Some editors have discussed removing DYK points and the like, but I personally am very much against doing so. They don't give all that many points so I don't think anyone will win based on them, they increase the visibility of the content, and in order to get a DYK a page has to be either (1) created, (2) expanded 5x, or (3) GA'd. Either of those 3 options are ''exactly'' what this WikiContest is trying to encourage. Points for review and stuff really are there so we don't add to the huge backlogs. We could add a clause were no editor may pass on to the next round or win if over 50% of their claimed points are from reviews. — ♠[[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[Non nobis solum]]. </small>♠ 11:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:i've removed the mention of an interwiki bonus from the DYK section; it's not mentioned elsewhere in the scoring page & i don't think it serves our purposes here <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 16:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:Thought about including points for new article creations? I'd be happy to participate if I could create new start-class articles about species in these countries and have them count for something. Maybe 1 point, for minimum 1500-character relevant article (with the 1.5 multiplier for least-develop countries)? [[User:Esculenta|Esculenta]] ([[User talk:Esculenta|talk]]) 19:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
::there was some discussion about this, but we were concerned that it might incentivize mass stub creation. for all intents & purposes, DYK credit can be considered a "new article creation" category. however, i'd be happy with giving points for non-DYK article creation with similar length/citation/etc criteria as DYK <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 21:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Well, if we're all okay with incentivizing mass "start" creation, then add it to the scoring column! I think it's a good idea to have a way to contribute and not be compelled to add to the demands of the review systems. [[User:Esculenta|Esculenta]] ([[User talk:Esculenta|talk]]) 22:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
::::totally fair, as DYK is still in backlog mode & GAN still has a pretty big backlog. pinging @[[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] @[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]] & @[[User:Generalissima|Generalissima]] to see if you guys have any input on this <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::What if we just accepted approved DYK nominations, instead of waiting until they actually run? (Obviously, disqualifying them if someone tries to game the system around that) <small> [[User:Generalissima|Generalissima]] ([[User talk:Generalissima|talk]]) (it/she) </small>  22:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::i would definitely be cool with this, as someone who just had an approved DYK nomination sitting waiting for promotion for over a month haha <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::Don't think start should qualify. I say B+ only. We want actual articles that take time and work, not something people can pump over and over to win. I also think any article not GA level should give at the very most 5 points. — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[Non nobis solum]]. </small> ♠ 22:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::I'm game with Generalissima's idea to count DYK accepts for points rather than running on the Main Page. While I have a somewhat more relaxed view on article creation than Ixtal, I agree with the basic sentiment: pumping out a bunch of low-quality articles is not the goal of this contest, as it does not contribute to the encyclopedic coverage of underrepresented communities/places. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 22:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::definitely agree with this <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::I disagree <s>with all of the above</s> that DYK nominations should be accepted instead of articles. If we want to incentivize article improvement of underrepresented areas, editors shouldn't be spending their time not contributing towards this goal. Editors will be finding interesting hooks, nominating them, doing QPQs, answering reviewer queries etc. instead of writing content. Obviously, an editor who goes through DYK should be rewarded, but why not also award points for, say, C class article creations? If I'm an editor and I find an underrepresented subject area and I have 10 articles I could write, it would take significantly more hours of work to send them all through DYK. — [[User:PerfectSoundWhatever|<span style="letter-spacing:0.1em;">PerfectSoundWhatever</span>]] ([[User talk:PerfectSoundWhatever|t]]; [[Special:Contributions/PerfectSoundWhatever|c]]) 00:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::I'll add that I personally don't often go through DYK, especially because most things I write don't have "hook"-y facts. — [[User:PerfectSoundWhatever|<span style="letter-spacing:0.1em;">PerfectSoundWhatever</span>]] ([[User talk:PerfectSoundWhatever|t]]; [[Special:Contributions/PerfectSoundWhatever|c]]) 00:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::to be fair i think you're actually agreeing with us here; at least me and Technosquirrel anyways <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 00:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Am I? I thought you guys were advocating for only accepting DYK nominations, while I agree with Esculenta and want the option for editors to submit C+ class articles outside of DYK. — [[User:PerfectSoundWhatever|<span style="letter-spacing:0.1em;">PerfectSoundWhatever</span>]] ([[User talk:PerfectSoundWhatever|t]]; [[Special:Contributions/PerfectSoundWhatever|c]]) 00:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::there's a compromise proposal to accept approved DYK nominations that haven't hit the main page, but my understanding is that there's consensus that as long as the articles aren't low-quality, new creations should count for something; the main concern here is balancing both encouraging quality article creation & avoiding worsening backlogs, while also avoiding incentivizing mass creation of crappy articles. the details of criteria still need to be decided though; i'll write a proposal in a subsection. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 00:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::While I do recognize your concerns, I don't think they're enough to take DYK out of the equation. Also, here's another point I haven't seen people discussing: it'd be an enormous burden on the coordinators to have to check that the new creations are at the rating that the editors think they are. In essence, they would have to conduct a DYK review — checking for copyright infringement, assessing sources, and scanning the prose for errors. You also seem to be implying that editors' time would be wasted at DYK when they could be writing something else, and I disagree on that point. Our goal is to improve encyclopedic coverage of underrepresented topics, and that goal does not end the moment you tab away from that page. DYK brings large amounts of attention to otherwise forgotten articles, and the review process undoubtedly improves (or, at the very least, reaffirms) their quality. I think this part would go a long way in incentivizing collaboration on underrepresented topics, which is a much more beneficial goal than making sure the participants receive points faster, in my opinion. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 00:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::::excellent points! you're right that there would be a lot of extra maintenance on our part doing checks of articles, which i think could be pretty impractical, especially if we get more participants <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 00:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Valid points, but in my opinion, the coordinators have less to check compared to a DYK review. Most competent editors could quickly assess an article on its citation density, reliable sourcing, NPOV, and class in about a couple minutes, no? — [[User:PerfectSoundWhatever|<span style="letter-spacing:0.1em;">PerfectSoundWhatever</span>]] ([[User talk:PerfectSoundWhatever|t]]; [[Special:Contributions/PerfectSoundWhatever|c]]) 02:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

== awards ==

what kinds of barnstars, awards, etc should we be giving out!!! <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 17:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:idea: other than the main big award the overall winner gets, i think having some specialized awards would be fun too, like "most countries covered" or "most top-level articles" "most article reviews" (PR, GAN, FAC) or other things like that - it would add a little whimsy & extra fun <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 17:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::There are the generic reviewing and quality content barnstars, which would be appropriate for special recognition of this kind. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 17:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:::works 4 me <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 17:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:i'm in a car and to lazy to look, is there a systemic bias barnstar!!! we could like give a {{tl|The Left Half of the Half Barnstar}} to ppl who make the 2nd round and this systemic bias barnstar to the finalists and cups to the top three, no!!! <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 17:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::i also support most countries/DYKs/GAs/FAs/reviews!!! <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 17:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Okay, I'm sorry for typing like that. But I also support somehow incorporating {{tl|cbarn}}. <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 17:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::::"im sorry for typing like that" you're just typing like me lmfao :sob: <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 17:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::rekt!!! <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 17:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:I was considering this as well. If we can bring on an artist or two, it might be cool to design some event-specific awards for podium winners. Other award ideas include the {{tl|Systemic Bias Barnstar}} and, of course, {{tl|The Completionist Barnstar}}. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 17:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::definitely agree w the systemic bias & completionist barnstars !! <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 17:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::Perhaps we can ask for a Grand Systemic Bias Barnstar? To give to the winner. Since we aren't doing rounds, perhaps the top 25 editors can win the regular bias barnstar. As much as I love the completionist philosophy, I don't see the reasoning for granting its barnstar as part of this WikiContest. — ♠[[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[Non nobis solum]]. </small>♠ 15:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
:ok so here are my specialty award ideas:
:* most countries covered
:* most articles for one country
:* most article reviews
:* most top-level articles
:to be awarded with some special barnstars. please give suggestions for which specific barnstars (or suggest new barnstars for this purpose) should be given for specific awards, as well as what special barnstars/awards should be given out to the top 3 overall winners. i like Ixtal's idea of a "grand systemic bias barnstar" <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 00:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
::Agree with those so far. Perhaps we could add one for most women articles? — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[Non nobis solum]]. </small> ♠ 23:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
:::ooh that would be fun! i'll start laying these down on the contest page - then we can see where we might want to ask someone to make new barnstars etc <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 23:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
::also, should we have special awards for the top 3 scorers? i'm thinking of something like a triple crown or the aforementioned grand systemic bias barnstar <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 00:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::i've layed out my initial ideas for the award scheme. anyone feel free to BOLDly change it, especially if you can find more specific/appropriate awards (or add new ones!) :) <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 01:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::I don't understand the distinction between "Most high-level articles" and "Most good/featured articles". <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 01:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Could you clarify what "high-level articles" are? It's additionally confusing considering there's another award for good and featured articles. {{small|(QoH and I just can't stop jinxing today)}} <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 01:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::::sorry, i'm talking about the articles referred to [[Wikipedia:2024_Developing_Countries_WikiContest/Scoring#From_relation_to_developing_countries|on the scoring page]], as in main & second-level country articles - i'll clarify the wording <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 01:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::To be honest, is it realistic to expect someone to improve multiple "high-level" articles to GA/FA within a three-month period? These articles are a lot of work due to their enormous scope. Also, the achievement of promoting those articles is already being awarded with massive multipliers. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 01:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::that's a good point; i'll remove it for now <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 01:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::Ah, I understand, but I agree with the squirrel. <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 02:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::It's lazy, but maybe do {{t|tcb}} for most countries covered? <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 02:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::::perhaps lazy, but certainly works! <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 02:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:if anyone here enjoys making templates, barnstars, and the like, i think a "global barnstar" would be lovely, along with our other suggestions of a "grand systemic bias barnstar" & some kind of cup or trophy perhaps :) <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 02:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{Doing|Doing the Global Barnstar}} <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 02:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::{{t|Gbarn}} <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 03:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::::wahoo! thanks :D <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 03:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:I could create some userboxen perhaps...? — [[User:PerfectSoundWhatever|<span style="letter-spacing:0.1em;">PerfectSoundWhatever</span>]] ([[User talk:PerfectSoundWhatever|t]]; [[Special:Contributions/PerfectSoundWhatever|c]]) 02:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::feel free! sounds fun :) <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 02:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

== North Korea ==
{{resbox|{{Y}} consensus for|[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#0000FF;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] ([[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#0000FF;">talk</span>]]) 06:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)}}
I believe that North Korea should be considered "least developed" and given a multiplier on {{slink|Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Scoring|Other states}}. Thoughts? <sup>[[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Queen</span>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contribs/Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">of</span>]]</small><sub>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred">Hearts</span>]]</sub> 20:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
:Thought we'd decided on this already. '''Support''', obviously. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 21:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
:DPRK is certainly on par with the rest of the "least developed" world, in both information and living conditions. works 4 me <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 03:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{+1}} — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[Non nobis solum]]. </small> ♠ 04:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

== In the news ==

Is it the same (as in, same points) if an article is accepted for Recent Deaths, or for a proper blurb? [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 02:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
:i'm personally fine with keeping the [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring#In_the_news|WikiCup standards]] where both recent deaths and blurbs count for the same amount, since that's really impossible to control on the nominator's end. ITN has [[WP:ITNCRIT|quality requirements]] for displaying on the main page, which is ultimately what we're looking at for scoring. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 02:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

== More feedback/questions ==

A few new thoughts, and revisiting a few that might need more discussion:

* The submissions page still needs to be figured out.
* The number of points for each type of submission hasn't been changed. Are we going with the same scores and categories as WikiCup, like 5 or 10 for DYK, 12 for ITN, etc?
* Has any thought been given to the total number of judges? There are currently two, are there plans to recruit a third (or even a fourth)?
* "Most submissions for a single country" should be reworded. Right now it could be read as "a barnstar is given to the one person who has the most submissions for a single country" or "one barnstar is given out per country based on who did the most in each country". The latter would be kind of insane.
* The "higher level" articles are such a narrow list of difficult articles that it might be worth expanding it or reworking the idea.
* Three months is a relatively short period of time for some of the review processes, especially GAN. We might consider a "soft launch" for June in which competitors are encouraged to start working on articles so they're ready to start nominating in July or can get their DYKs nominated in late June if we're going with DYK submissions. The WikiCup has Round 1 as a low-barrier warm up, but DCWC doesn't have that luxury.
* There was talk of a prominently displayed "needs review" panel like [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews needed]] to help noms get reviewed more quickly and to help reviewers find qualifying noms. We should figure out what that will look like.
[[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#324717">The</span><span style="color:#45631f">big</span><span style="color:#547826">ugly</span><span style="color:#68942f">alien</span>]] ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:sienna">talk</span>]]) 06:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

:Re #3, the plan was to have a third more experienced judge (cf. [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)/Archive_56#The_Developing_Countries_WikiContest|the VPI thread]], which was archived without comment), but no one has stepped forward thus far. <small>and re #4, it should be the latter, so I can just farm random Pacific islands...{{jokes}}</small> [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#00008B;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] ([[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#00008B;">talk</span>]]) 06:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
::AFAIK #4 is the latter, unless {{u|sawyer-mcdonell}} disagrees. I'd appreciate if you could expand a bit on your feedback for #5, {{u|Thebiguglyalien}}. — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 18:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
:::{{u|sawyer777|fix failed ping}} [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#483D8B;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] ([[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#483D8B;">talk</span>]]) 18:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
:::The bonus points system at [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Scoring#From relation to developing countries]] assumes that several people will be working on these types of articles, but I don't believe there are going to be any meaningful contributions there. I think that the scope of those bonuses should be expanded in some way if it's going to be kept, though I don't have a proposal for what exactly it would look like. [[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#324717">The</span><span style="color:#45631f">big</span><span style="color:#547826">ugly</span><span style="color:#68942f">alien</span>]] ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:sienna">talk</span>]]) 21:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
:::i actually was thinking the former, as that is more practical & matches with the award for the person who covers the most countries <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 21:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
::::i welcome a rewording although i'm not sure exactly what to change the wording to <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 21:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
*FWIW, re. point 3 I think it should be the former. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#00008B;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] ([[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#00008B;">talk</span>]]) 22:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
*:(i assume you mean #4?) <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
*::<small>Yes. Don't edit Wikipedia while eating pasta... [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#2F4F4F;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] ([[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#2F4F4F;">talk</span>]]) 23:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)</small>

:Should we make a subpage for the submissions of everyone? — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 20:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
::yes - i think we can have it all on one subpage, much like a backlog drive <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 20:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
:::{{+1}} [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#000080;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] ([[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#000080;">talk</span>]]) 20:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Created [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Submissions]], though we may want to rename it. — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 22:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::I think it's a good idea to have a leaderboard-style table, but we also need a page with sections for each user where they can list their submissions. I'm thinking something like the [[Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2024#Participants and reviews tracker|GAN backlog drive]]. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::as of how it's designed right now, this page does both - i would be amiable to splitting it into two pages though <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

:"Three months is a relatively short period of time for some of the review processes, especially GAN". There are points for GA, but also for GA reviews, which should speed up the process. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 02:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

== Translations ==
How will translations of articles from developing countries be  evaluated? [[User:HarveyPrototype|HarveyPrototype]] ([[User talk:HarveyPrototype|talk]]) 16:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
:this is a good question! @[[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] thoughts? <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 16:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
::I see the value as adding them to the wiki, {{u|Sawyer777|Sawyer}}. I'd personally score them equally as creating articles. Articles in, say, [[Burmese language]] that are not yet in the english wiki probably are equally important to Myanmar than an article that doesn't exist in either, if not more so. However, if others feel that they should be scored less I am open to that possibility. — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 17:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
:::i agree that translations are very valuable, and something we should encourage - so we have something to work off of, how would 5 points be for a score? <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 23:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

:::"I'd personally score them equally as creating articles." Check again, we don't score the mere creation of articles. We score created articles that pass the DYK process, which guarantees some basic quality. The problem with translations is that anyone with google and a basic fluency to check the results can translate articles from other wikis and quickly farm points. Just a mere 40 semi-bot translations, 2 or 3 hours at most, and you get as many points as someone who promotes a featured article. It would be too easy to derail the contest's purpose that way. It may be better to treat translation like any other new article, only scores if it passes DYK (or if it is promoted to higher levels in record time). [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 02:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
::::this is a great point... i don't do translation work at all so i forgot about the existence of machine translation for a moment. i agree with your idea of requiring it pass DYK criteria. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 02:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
::::{{u|Cambalachero}}, my statement works regardless of if they are currently scored or not. — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 08:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

== Greenland ==
{{atop
| status = 
| result = consensus for '''developing''' [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#483D8B;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] ([[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#483D8B;">talk</span>]]) 05:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
: And it turns out this was already done 🤷‍♀️ [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#8B4513;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] ([[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#8B4513;">talk</span>]]) 05:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
}}


Should Greenland be classified as "developed" (ineligible), "developing" (eligible), or "least developed" (1.5x multiplier)? [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#0645AD;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] ([[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#0645AD;">talk</span>]]) 00:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
* '''Developing''' as proposer. On the map, it's "no data", but the first sentence of [[Economy of Greenland]] calls it {{tq|small, mixed and vulnerable}}, it is heavily dependant on Denmark ({{tq|the economy is critically dependent upon substantial support from the Danish government, which supplies about half the revenues of the Self-rule Government [the government of Greenland], which in turn employs 10,307 Greenlanders out of 25,620 currently in employment (2015)}}), and {{tq|Unemployment nonetheless remains high, with the rest of the economy dependent upon demand for exports of shrimp and fish.}} [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#0645AD;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] ([[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#0645AD;">talk</span>]]) 00:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
*:i concur with this <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 00:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
*::+1. Apart from basic numbers, the Greenlandic Inuit are under heavy environmental stress which threatens their old ways of life that depend on the sea ice, now disappearing fast. They have to transform their economy entirely, towards something more urbanised and economically viable. This too, I would say, is a sign of a developing economy. 
*::Also consider the HDI of 0.786, which although classified as "high", lags significantly behind the rest of the Danish Realm - Denmark is at 0.952 and the Faroes are at 0.950. And all the other IMF-designated developed countries are well above 0.800. [[User:Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI|Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI|talk to me!]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:contributions/Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI|my edits]]</sub></small>) 06:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
*:::definitely! not to mention the colonial dynamics, which while not directly correlated with development, are relevant contextually. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 06:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
*::::Soooo... are they counted? Shall I notify them? [[User:Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI|Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI|talk to me!]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:contributions/Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI|my edits]]</sub></small>) 16:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
*:::::pinging @[[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] if they have any last-minute objections but i'd say just go for it - i'll update the contest pages as well <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 17:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
*::::::No objections here, ping appreciated, {{u|Sawyer777|Sawyer}}. — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 20:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}

== Multiplier template ==

Hi! Is someone here skilled enough to make a version of [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Multiplier]] that would work with our multiplier criteria? — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 14:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

:{{yo|Ixtal}} Done, see [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Multiplier]]. <small>The DYK bonus points don't get multiplied, right?</small> – <code style="background:#333;border:1px solid #999">[[User:Hilst|<span style="color:#fff;text-shadow:0 0 5px #fff">Hilst</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Hilst|<span style="color:#090">&lbrack;talk&rbrack;</span>]]</code> 15:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

== Question ==

Is the country Bangladesh under this contest? [[User:Mehedi Abedin|Mehedi Abedin]] ([[User talk:Mehedi Abedin|talk]]) 00:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
:It is; see {{slink|Wikipedia:2024_Developing_Countries_WikiContest/Scoring#"Least_developed"_countries}}. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 01:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

== submissions? ==

how will a submissions system work for this? should we use the same system as the WikiCup? or something else... i have very little preference on that front, but i'd like to require submissions to designate which country they're submitting for. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 23:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

:Yeah it could be the same system as the WikiCup with additional rule that submissions must include the ''primary'' country claimed. For example, if one did the [[Eritrean–Ethiopian border conflict]] they could claim it as either, but the bonus multiplier will depend on that explicit choice made by the submitter. — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[Non nobis solum]]. </small> ♠ 00:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
::great idea! (although both Eritrea & Ethiopia are least developed, so it wouldn't matter for the multiplier). i think we could allow people to include multiple countries in their submissions, but only claim one for multiplier & point purposes. i think it would be fine for someone to submit a Nagorno-Karabakh conflict article (for example) for both Armenia and Azerbaijan & get credit towards the "most countries covered" award for both, though. hope that makes sense <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 00:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
:Like I mentioned earlier somewhere, I don't think we'll be dealing with a volume of submissions large enough to merit subpages WikiCup-style; at least not for now. A regular backlog drive–style page with sections for each participant should work just fine, maybe with a couple of columns to track the number of submissions and coordinator-approved points. I like the idea of "claiming" the country or countries that have been expanded with the submission — maybe just a {{tl|flagicon}} or two before the links, which would give the page some color. I know [[WP:WPWIR|Women in Red]] sometimes does that. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 05:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
::this works for me; i agree that there is not a real need for subpages (which would also be a lot of maintenance) & a single page will probably be fine. flagicons sounds fun :) <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer-mcdonell|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 05:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I've never participated in any of these events. Reading the rules it mentions a submission page. Can somebody point me in the right direction as to how to set it up? [[User:HarveyPrototype|HarveyPrototype]] ([[User talk:HarveyPrototype|talk]]) 23:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:HarveyPrototype|HarveyPrototype]]: The submissions page is still under construction, but you can find it at [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Submissions]]. Both it and the main project page will be updated with more information when relevant. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 23:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you [[User:HarveyPrototype|HarveyPrototype]] ([[User talk:HarveyPrototype|talk]]) 01:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
::Do we submit the article after they've been reviewed? In draft form? Complete the article and share it for submission? [[User:HarveyPrototype|HarveyPrototype]] ([[User talk:HarveyPrototype|talk]]) 02:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
:::{{u|HarveyPrototype}}, point scoring milestones are only available for published articles, so drafts would not qualify. You can see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2022/Submissions/A._C._Santacruz&oldid=1066835396 my 2022 WikiCup submissions page] to see how articles are submitted for points, for example. — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 04:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Ok lets see if I understand. 
::::1. Where do I find the project page DCWC/2024/Submissions/{user} in order to create my submission page. 
::::I would like to see if a couple of participations are considered. The first would be [[Cooperative University of Colombia]] it was a stump but since I was working on a list which mentioned the university I proceeded to add the information that I knew. 
::::The second would be the following [[List of universities in Ecuador]] 
::::And finally I've been working on the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ecuador]] to organize it and make it more readable see:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ecuador/Missing articles]] [[User:HarveyPrototype|HarveyPrototype]] ([[User talk:HarveyPrototype|talk]]) 01:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::@[[User:HarveyPrototype|HarveyPrototype]]: The current plan is to have all participants' submissions on [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Submissions|a single page]]; each editor will get a sub-heading to list their work. The two articles you've linked should fall within the scope of this contest, though the coordinators may want to chime in on that. However, you will have to put the article through one of the processes listed at [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Scoring|the scoring page]] to get points. Also, note that the contest only opens for submissions on July 1. And while WikiProject organization is a valuable and appreciated addition to the project, this contest is content-focused — "back-end" contributions don't fall within its scope. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 03:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::@[[User:HarveyPrototype|HarveyPrototype]]: Plans have changed! Participants will now have dedicated subpages for their submissions owing to the number of editors who have signed up so far. More information will be forthcoming towards the start of the contest. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 01:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

== "Combat systemic bias on Wikipedia and earn special awards" at the top of everyone's watchlist ==

Is having a banner basically saying "Wikipedia sucks" at the top everyone's watchlist really appropriate?  I'm not sure advocacy for such a subjective subject belongs in Wikivoice.   And who decided on that verbiage?  Was it the product of consensus? [[User:Marcus Markup|Marcus Markup]] ([[User talk:Marcus Markup|talk]]) 12:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

:It is well-known and well-documented that en.wiki has a [[WP:Systemic bias]], but I don't think that means Wikipedia sucks! Similar drives are held reasonably regularly. What might alternative wording be? [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 12:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
:{{u|Marcus Markup}}, I'm not sure "wikivoice" is a term that can be applied to text outside of the encyclopedic articles. Watchlist notices do not require site-wide consensus regarding their wording. Calls for signups for other events, such as GAN drives, copy-editing drives, and the WikiCup this contest is based off are frequently placed on the watchlist. I disagree that the wording implies "Wikipedia sucks". I do not think "bias" is an inherently accusatory or negative word, and I hope that other editors reading the notice instead see it as an optimistic and excited call for action. "Let's make the site better!" is kind of the spirit I get from the message and which I was feeling when we started brainstorming this contest. I encourage you to sign up as well! Based off of your editing activities, articles like [[Chess in China]] or [[Chess in India]] seem like great articles to get your first GA with and which would qualify for this WikiContest. ^u^ — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 15:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

== Great idea ==

I do not have time to participate this year but I'm glad you organized this and hope it turns out with great article improvement results. ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] &#183; [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 13:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks for well wishes, [[User:Buidhe|Buidhe]]! Should everything go smoothly this time around, we're hoping to make this a recurring event. Maybe next time! <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 15:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

== Fauna/flora articles ==

Are species of animal/plant/fungi that live mainly or entirely in a developing country eligible to be claimed for that country? For example, could [[black-headed tailorbird]] be claimed for the [[Philippines]]? [[User:AryKun|AryKun]] ([[User talk:AryKun|talk]]) 10:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks, [[User:AryKun|AryKun]]. The threshold we're using to determine whether a subject falls within the contest's scope is based on how closely associated or significant it is to the country in question. In this case, the fact that ''O. nigriceps'' is endemic to the Philippines and has been commemorated on a stamp indicates to the coordinators that it is indeed associated and should be eligible for points. Please feel free to bring specific questions like these to the talk page if there are any doubts in the future! <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 16:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

== I need an explanation ==

I just saw the notification banner and came here, but I really can't understand what this WikiContest is about... Could someone clarify it for me. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:100%;color:#50B849;background-color:transparent;;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>[[User talk:Vestrian24Bio|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;color:#0078D7;background-color:transparent;;">'''''TALK'''''</span>]]</small>) 16:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

:{{u|Vestrian24Bio}}, how familiar are you with the [[WP:CUP|WikiCup]]? — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 17:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
::Never even heard of it before... <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:100%;color:#50B849;background-color:transparent;;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>[[User talk:Vestrian24Bio|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;color:#0078D7;background-color:transparent;;">'''''TALK'''''</span>]]</small>) 17:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
:this WikiContest is for articles relating to [[developing countries]], to help combat [[systemic bias on Wikipedia]] (see also [[WP:Systemic bias]]) by encouraging editors to contribute to our coverage of ignored parts of the world. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 17:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
::So, we just improve articles related to a developing country; is that it? <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:100%;color:#50B849;background-color:transparent;;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>[[User talk:Vestrian24Bio|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;color:#0078D7;background-color:transparent;;">'''''TALK'''''</span>]]</small>) 17:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
:::yes, through a process like DYK, GA, etc. then you submit it and you will get points for it. see [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Scoring]] <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 17:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
::::Got it, thanks. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:100%;color:#50B849;background-color:transparent;;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>[[User talk:Vestrian24Bio|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;color:#0078D7;background-color:transparent;;">'''''TALK'''''</span>]]</small>) 17:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

== Q ==

I'm not familiar with Wikicups, so I'm asking this here:
What would get something to "GA"? Aside from those six criteria that I'm aware of, like if something is meeting the 6 criteria but is short (Let's say... ~7000 bytes or around 500 words in prose?) will it be possible for it to pass? [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] <small> ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) </small> 04:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

:It would have to run through a [[WP:Good article nomination]] and be approved by an uninvolved editor. There is a [[Wikipedia:Very short featured articles|perennial debate]] about short length, so it would really depend on the reason for the length, the page, and the reviewer. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 04:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
::Well to get a good idea of the GA process I just went and nominated one for experience. [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] <small> ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) </small> 11:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

== Subjects related to countries that no longer exist, but whose successors are devloping ==

Am I right in assuming that these would go under the flag of their successor countries? For example, an article related to historical events/people in [[Rhodesia]] could count as an entry for [[Zimbabwe]], [[South West Africa]] articles for [[Namibia]] (typically), ect? 

But also, how do you guys want to deal with articles that may not cleanly be connected to one singular modern day country? For example, {{Interlanguage link|Drinka Pavlovic|lt=Drinka Pavlovic|sr|Дринка Павловић|ru|Павлович, Дринка}} was a Yugoslavian resistance fighter, murdered at the [[Banjica concentration camp]]. She was born and raised in what we would consider Serbia today, but never identified as anything other than Yugoslavian (which itself was, I believe, considered a developing country [https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/531601468174280252/pdf/multi0page.pdf at the time of its dissolution](605)). I'd probably feel comfortable putting Pavlovic's article under the Serbian flag for this contest. [[Wikipedia:BALKANS|Would that be appropriate]]? [[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|GreenLipstickLesbian]] ([[User talk:GreenLipstickLesbian|talk]]) 19:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
:yes, i would definitely consider those to be within the competition's purview. regarding people like Pavlovic, i think she could be put under the Serbian flag, <s>but i wouldn't see anything wrong with adding the Yugoslav flag next to it, for example.</s> see below <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 19:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
::adding on - i know i chatted with @[[User:AirshipJungleman29|AirshipJungleman29]] at one point about his Mongol Empire projects, and said that would indeed count for Mongolia (or Afghanistan, etc.) since it is part of the history of currently-existing countries. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 19:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
:For purposes of points tracking, please only use current countries' flags. If not it messes up with our ability to apply the points modifiers. — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 20:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
::ah good point - forgot about the bot haha <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 20:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Sawyer777|Sawyer777]] Thanks for the response and confirmation, and thank you @[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]] for clarifying on the main page. (Demonstrable signifigance, that's something I can deal with). I suppose it's for the best that we get all our edge case testing out of the way in the first year (hopefully of many). And silly bots, not being able to recognise countries that don't exist anymore. How dare it follow the instructions exactly as it was given. [[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|GreenLipstickLesbian]] ([[User talk:GreenLipstickLesbian|talk]]) 07:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
::Might be worth putting this somewhere noticeable if we haven't already. [[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#324717">The</span><span style="color:#45631f">big</span><span style="color:#547826">ugly</span><span style="color:#68942f">alien</span>]] ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:sienna">talk</span>]]) 22:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
:I was about to ask this in reference to Korea. While North Korea is considered a least-developed country and South Korea a highly-developed country, there are a lot of articles about pre-division Korea when it was either under the Joseon dynasty or Japanese imperial occupation. How are we to treat these? --[[User:Grnrchst|Grnrchst]] ([[User talk:Grnrchst|talk]]) 10:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::coords chatted about this and we agreed that pre-1945 Korean history is definitely suitable, as long as there's some kind of demonstrable connection to the North. we want to avoid scope creep, especially since North Korean articles are eligible for the least-developed bonus. without any examples (and i don't know much about Korean history) it's hard to draw a specific line, but if you've got an article in mind post it here. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 14:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::Hypothetically, if I were to do something with [[Mongol invasions of Korea]], it would fall under high-developed (SK), developing (Mongolia), and least developed (NK). Probably best to devise a blanket rule, if you don't want to judge each time this comes up. [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 14:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::::speedy replier over here... we'll keep workshopping this. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 14:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::::Thanks, [[User:AirshipJungleman29|Airship]]; the blanket rule for this contest is the point of association and significance mentioned at [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Scoring#General rules|the guidelines]], which I've just expanded a little per the questions raised at this discussion. Articles qualifying for submission under multiple countries should be submitted under an applicable "least developed" country, as that would give the submission the 1.5× points multiplier. The coordinators are happy to resolve any remaining questions about potentially ambiguous subjects. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 15:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::I'm confused about "Articles associated with a "least developed" country will receive a 1.5× points multiplier." Is the multiplier wrong? [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 17:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::The multiplier is correct. There are also multipliers for broad-topic articles about eligible countries; details are at {{slinkno|Wikipedia:2024_Developing_Countries_WikiContest/Scoring#Bonus_points}}. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 20:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::That says that a "least-developed" country article will receive either a x2 or x2.5 multiplier, no? [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 18:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
::{{outdent|5}} As mentioned in the table, the higher multipliers only apply to "high-level" articles (and don't stack on other multipliers). Most articles associated with "least developed" countries won't fall into these categories and so will receive the usual 1.5×. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 02:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

== Articles related to developing countries in a broader/general sense, rather than specific developing countries ==

1. Do such articles count, and 2. if so, how would these be treated/listed? E.g. if someone were to improve the [[developing country]] or [[fair trade]] or [[neglected tropical diseases]] or [[decolonization]] articles. All of them are strongly associated with/have a clear significance to developing and/or least developed countries, but it wouldn't make much sense to list any of them under a specific country. [[User:AddWittyNameHere|<span style="background:#42024b; color:#fcf09c;">'''''AddWitty'''''</span>]][[User talk:AddWittyNameHere|<span style="background:#fcf09c; color:#42024b;">''NameHere''</span>]] 00:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

:I'd say they should qualify if they're specifically about developing countries. So fair trade and decolonization wouldn't really count under that metric, since those apply to most countries. And maybe they shouldn't be subject to multipliers, because the point of giving bonus points to least developed countries is because those ones need specific attention. On a similar point, I'd say that any topic relating to Africa, Latin America, Eastern Europe, Pacific Islands, or Asia in general should count for non-multiplied points as well. [[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#324717">The</span><span style="color:#45631f">big</span><span style="color:#547826">ugly</span><span style="color:#68942f">alien</span>]] ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:sienna">talk</span>]]) 00:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks, [[User:AddWittyNameHere|AddWittyNameHere]]! Yes, these articles absolutely do count. For subjects that could be submitted under multiple countries, you can take your pick as to which one — a "least developed" country if applicable, since that would give you the 1.5× points multiplier. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 03:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

== Qualifying reviews list ==

In the "Review requests" box, should there be a second list below the requests, listing all other open reviews that would qualify for points? That way we don't demand every participant try to find qualifying reviews on their own, and it might help get more reviews done overall. [[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#324717">The</span><span style="color:#45631f">big</span><span style="color:#547826">ugly</span><span style="color:#68942f">alien</span>]] ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:sienna">talk</span>]]) 21:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

I took the initiative and created [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Eligible reviews]]. Move it, transclude it, ignore it, whatever you want, but I'm willing to keep it updated. [[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#324717">The</span><span style="color:#45631f">big</span><span style="color:#547826">ugly</span><span style="color:#68942f">alien</span>]] ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:sienna">talk</span>]]) 03:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
:sounds good! <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:24, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
:My response {{em|was}} going to be that it sounds like a great idea, but might be difficult to maintain. If you've got it covered, though, let's run with it. I'll link the page in relevant places when I can sit down to edit. Thanks for being proactive on this! <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 01:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

== Can't find one ==

I'm having trouble finding an article I can work on, because a lot of ones in my scope that I'm trying to look for have already been expanded, probably from past drive, is there like a list of stub articles for developing countries itself? [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] <small> ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) </small> 02:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

:There is a list of article at [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Suggested articles]], and if you want stubs specifically it might be worth checking categories for country Wikiprojects, eg. [[:Category:Stub-Class Afghanistan articles]] (just switch the country name for a different country). [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 02:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
:Expansion is not the only goal, there is also improvement as certified by the GA and FA processes. [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 10:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

== Submissions format ==

How to post a submission with all its relevant links? An example should be given somewhere. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:100%;color:#50B849;background-color:transparent;;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>[[User talk:Vestrian24Bio|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;color:#0078D7;background-color:transparent;;">'''''TALK'''''</span>]]</small>) 02:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
:Hey [[User:Vestrian24Bio|Vestrian24Bio]], example markup is available in a hidden comment for each section on your submissions page. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 02:40, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
::Didn't see that; got it now, Thanks! <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:100%;color:#50B849;background-color:transparent;;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>[[User talk:Vestrian24Bio|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;color:#0078D7;background-color:transparent;;">'''''TALK'''''</span>]]</small>) 02:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

== Question(s) ==

I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:2024_Developing_Countries_WikiContest/Submissions/BeanieFan11&diff=prev&oldid=1232212164 submitted] my first entry. Just wondering: did I format that properly? Also, is there a leaderboard for this competition [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2024|like there is]] for the WikiCup? Thanks, [[User:BeanieFan11|BeanieFan11]] ([[User talk:BeanieFan11|talk]]) 15:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

:Looks fine to me. [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Leaderboard|Yes]], but it's not live yet. – <code style="background:#333;border:1px solid #999">[[User:Hilst|<span style="color:#fff;text-shadow:0 0 5px #fff">Hilst</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Hilst|<span style="color:#090">&lbrack;talk&rbrack;</span>]]</code> 15:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
:The proper ISO country code in this case would be [[ISO 3166-2:KP|KP]]. Aside from that looks fine to me, {{u|BeanieFan11}}. — ♠ [[User:Ixtal|Ixtal]] <sup>( [[User talk:Ixtal|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ixtal|C]] ) </sup> &#8258; <small> [[WP:2024DCWC|Sign up for the 2024 DCWC!]] — [[Non nobis solum]] </small> ♠ 21:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

== International organizations ==

Do articles on [[international organization]]s, [[trade bloc]]s, and other unions consisting of mainly or only developing countries count for points (like [[Mercosur]], [[African Union]], [[Arab League]], [[Commonwealth of Independent States]], or even [[Group of 77]])? Do we just pick a country to submit under, as described [[Wikipedia talk:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest#Articles related to developing countries in a broader/general sense, rather than specific developing countries|above]]? [[User:TappyTurtle|<span style="color: #1c9e6a">TappyTurtle</span>]] &#91;[[User talk:TappyTurtle|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/TappyTurtle|contribs]]&#93; 21:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
:yes, i would count those since they have demonstrable connection & significance to developing countries. due to how the bot works, you should just pick ''a'' country flag that works using the ISO code - with intergovernmental orgs, i'd go with whichever country the org is headquartered in (e.g. Russia for CIS). <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
::alright, makes sense. [[User:TappyTurtle|<span style="color: #1c9e6a">TappyTurtle</span>]] &#91;[[User talk:TappyTurtle|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/TappyTurtle|contribs]]&#93; 04:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

== An insect? ==

Does [[Microhodotermes viator]] count for Namibia or South Africa? It is eaten by humans (as mentioned in the predation section), but that’s not the focus of the article. <span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧁</span>[[User:Zanahary|Zanahary]]<span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧂</span> 00:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:it could count for either - it won't matter for points since they're both developing, so just pick whichever flag you like more haha. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 18:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

== Request to withdraw ==

I'd like to withdraw my participation from the DCWC, as I don't think that I'll have time to focus on content for the contest. Thanks. – <code style="background:#333;border:1px solid #999">[[User:Hilst|<span style="color:#fff;text-shadow:0 0 5px #fff">Hilst</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Hilst|<span style="color:#090">&lbrack;talk&rbrack;</span>]]</code> 17:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
:{{Done}}. Sorry to see you go, [[User:Hilst|Hilst]]! Please let me know if you'd also like to opt out of contest updates and I'll take you off the mailing list. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 19:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
::Please do! – <code style="background:#333;border:1px solid #999">[[User:Hilst|<span style="color:#fff;text-shadow:0 0 5px #fff">Hilst</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Hilst|<span style="color:#090">&lbrack;talk&rbrack;</span>]]</code> 19:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

== DYK Reviews ==

DYK reviews count for points? [[User:Vanderwaalforces|Vanderwaalforces]] ([[User talk:Vanderwaalforces|talk]]) 08:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
:Nope, only successful nominations that appear on the Main Page. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 14:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
::Gotcha! [[User:Vanderwaalforces|Vanderwaalforces]] ([[User talk:Vanderwaalforces|talk]]) 15:01, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

== Question ==

Just asking, if you make an article a GA, and then you make it FA, do you get both 35 and 200 points, or you get only 200 points? <code>[[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]]</code> 03:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
:yes, you get both! it would be pretty impressive to get an article through both processes within 3 months haha. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 05:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

== [[WP:WikiProject Oral tradition]] ==

Would people be interested in joining a wikiproject on improving and creating articles about oral tradition? Wikipedia's coverage on this appears to be very poor [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 19:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
:personally i've got a lot on my plate both wikipedia-wise and in real life, but you've certainly got my moral support! :) <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 06:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

== Second-level country article question ==

Does, for example, the [[Flag of North Korea]] count as a "second-level country article"? "Flag of{{nbsp}}..." is not listed in [[Wikipedia:Sample country outline]], but all countries' outlines list their respective flags. <big>[[User:Yue|<span style="color:#757575; font-family:Consolas, monospace">''Yue''</span>]][[User talk:Yue|🌙]]</big> 01:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
:We had a brief discussion about flag articles with another participant recently; the short answer is no, primarily because it is not typical for flags to receive a dedicated section in the main article about their countries, and vexillology articles clearly do not have the same significance as, say, ''Culture of...'' or ''Economy of...'' articles. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 06:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
::{{Reply|TechnoSquirrel69}} Got it, thank you! <big>[[User:Yue|<span style="color:#757575; font-family:Consolas, monospace">''Yue''</span>]][[User talk:Yue|🌙]]</big> 20:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

== My leaderboard ==

Recently, Ixtal put my DYK into the GANR section of the leaderboard, and said it should be worth 10 points, meaning I could get 15, can any coordinator fix this? <code>[[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]]</code> 23:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
:i've fixed the issue - it's up to date now :) <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 00:45, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

== Réunion ==

Does [[Réunion]], an island in the Indian Ocean next to [[Mauritius]], count for points? [[User:BeanieFan11|BeanieFan11]] ([[User talk:BeanieFan11|talk]]) 20:03, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
:As of right now, no. Neither the International Monetary Fund nor the United Nations have identified it as a developing economy. We could add it to the list by consensus, [[Wikipedia talk:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Archive 1#Greenland|like we did for Greenland]], but I'm not sure we want to do that a month and a half into the contest. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 00:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

== ITN ==

If you expand and nominate an article which appeared ITN, does it count for points? <code>[[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]]</code> 12:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
:As per [[Wikipedia:2024_Developing_Countries_WikiContest/Scoring#In_the_news|the scoring page]], yes, if you do significant work on the article. [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 13:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
::{{ping|AirshipJungleman29}} According to XTools, I have 23.1 authorship of the article, is it significant enough to gain points? <code>[[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]]</code> 13:21, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
:::Let's see if it gets posted first. [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 13:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
::::If you want to participate, go to [[WP:In the news/Candidates#Kingdom of Jesus Christ compound standoff|this link]]. <code>[[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]]</code> 13:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

== Points for an entry ==

{{ping|TechnoSquirrel69|Ixtal|sawyer777}} Late to notice this, but I think the points for one of my entries - [[Han Bong-zin]] - might have been calculated incorrectly. As of now, it has the five base DYK points and a 1.5 multiplier for being least-developed. According to the scoring page, {{tq|In addition, DYK appearances for articles that were created during or before 2019 will be awarded at least 5 bonus points. For each additional year prior to 2019, the bonus increases by 1.}} The article for Bong-zin was started in 2011; see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Han_Bong-zin&action=history&dir=prev here]. Wouldn't that mean it gets 13 extra points for age? Just wondering. [[User:BeanieFan11|BeanieFan11]] ([[User talk:BeanieFan11|talk]]) 23:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks for bringing this to our attention, [[User:BeanieFan11|BeanieFan11]]! I've made the correction on your submission as well as a handful of submissions from other participants. The bonus points are now noted on your submissions page. Let me know if you have any other questions. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 21:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

== Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon ==

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
[[Image:Women_in_Green_logo.svg|100px|right]]
Hello 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest: 

'''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green|WikiProject Women in Green]]''' is holding a ''' month-long [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green/Meetup/7|Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024]]'''!<br /><br />
Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme '''Around the World in 31 Days'''! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least '''31 countries''' (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 

We hope to see you there!
[[User:Grnrchst|Grnrchst]] ([[User talk:Grnrchst|talk]]) 13:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)</div>

== My flag ==

I know this is late into the contest, but I'm wondering if I could have my flag changed to Sao Tome and Principe's for the remaining duration, i.e. {{flagicon|STP}} [[User:Yue|Yue]]. Thank you! <big>[[User:Yue|<span style="color:#757575; font-family:Consolas, monospace">''Yue''</span>]][[User talk:Yue|🌙]]</big> 15:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Yue|Yue]]: {{Done}}. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 15:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

== Post-competition appearances ==

Hello, with this drawing to a close I thought it worth raising the question of what will happen to any FA/GA/DYK nominated before the end of the period but not passing. There may need to be rules for each. GAs may be the easiest to quickly wrap up of these, but FAs are dependent on coordinator decisions, and DYKs are dependent on a couple of steps before the main page even after the DYK passes review.{{pb}}If the decision is to cut of points at status award at 30 September (ie passing of FA/GA, main page appearance of DYK), I think it would still be worth recording any in-process noms somehow, as while points are nice, the benefit of the contest in reducing systematic bias is also met by later article's prompted by the contest. While I expect some to get through in the next few weeks, I did a potential mockup with [[Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Submissions/Chipmunkdavis|my current DYKs]], for example. Best, [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 04:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]]: Apologies for the delay; I'm not sure how I missed your question for this long. We had this question come up in the planning phase before the contest, and a compromise that the coordinators agreed on was to accept DYK nominations that had been approved by a reviewer but had not yet appeared on the Main Page on the final day of the contest. GAs and FAs, lacking any clean solution that was discussed, will be treated as usual. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 20:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks. I'll mark anything not reviewed off into its own subsection at the end then, for posterity. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 01:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

== Post-contest reflections ==

Thanks again to everyone for taking part in this! The coordinators would like to hear how the contest went for you, regardless of your editing experience or level of participation. There are a few starter questions below, but feel free to use {{slinkno|#General comments}} below for other discussions, or start a new section if needed.

# The contest initially attracted many new editors but largely failed to retain their participation. How could this be improved upon?
# The format of this contest was based on the WikiCup's. How could modifications to this format be made to better fit the goals of the DCWC? Should an altogether new one be chosen?
# How could [[WP:DCWC/S|the scoring rules]] be refined or improved upon?
# Have you identified any other problems with the contest? If so, how could they be addressed in the future?

We're looking forward to hearing what you think! <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 18:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

=== General comments ===

Use this space for general discussion. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 18:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

:Could there be a space for editors to submit articles they want to collaborate on? Or would that muddy the waters [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 20:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]]: I'm open to ideas on how we can make the contest a more collaborative endeavor, which is something I've discussed with the other coordinators as well. I don't think it would muddy the waters, since multiple participants can submit the same article if all of them have made substantive contributions to it. If we created a space for open collaboration, how would you want to approach that process? Would it be a request for another editor to collaborate in equivalent capacities (and if so, how would you go about that?) or maybe as a "mentorship" of sorts, where they provide guidance to help you eventually nominate your work? <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 15:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]] Mentorship is a really interesting idea but I'm not sure it's best suited as a feature for this, but as a general feature I think would be great, especially for roles at AfC, Teahouse etc. Idk I struggle to see how that would work in practice since I imagine this is for the more advanced editors
:::Could people intending to collaborate throughout the tournament together enter as a joint couple and you divide their score by two for the leaderboard?
:::Say two people collaborated on one article, could the two people agree on a fair allocation of the points, for example 70% : 30%? In the rare case there's disagreement, someone could just swoop in and make a rough binding judgement [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 17:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
::::Points are not split between editors for collaborative submissions, each participant receives full credit provided they have done substantive work towards the submission in question. I agree that mentorship is probably not the way to go here; I just wanted to throw some ideas out there that other editors can hopefully expand upon. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 21:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::Could there be points for cleanup, or could say 15 articles be handpicked that are in dire need of improvement or creation and bonus points are awarded for those? [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 18:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
:I didn't get to participate as much as I'd have liked (writing can be ''hard'', y'all, and DYK even trickier!), but I made myself an entire list of articles I'd like to create and that I'll be working on throughout the year. Hopefully I'll un-redlink most of them by next year's contest! I also made several articles that likely would have qualified, but I was unable to find a hook for, and that, while hopefully useful to readers, were no-where near comprehensive enough for DYK/GA process. [[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|GreenLipstickLesbian]] ([[User talk:GreenLipstickLesbian|talk]]) 21:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
::Coming up with an idea that, it is quite likely, I would only find helpful or interesting- I like the way that the other Wikipedia example of removing systemic bias, WIR, measures its success in terms of articles created. There isn't "points" system per say. Now, I'm not saying get rid of the points system here, so the Wiki-cup editors don't need to panic, but what if there was an alternate system where users could submit new articles creations and expansions, and the group as a whole would attempt to reach certain milestones? Simultaneous with the DYK/GA/Featured content point systems, of course. So instead of the news updates being just "and here's how Generalissima's crushing it", it would be "Here's how Generalissima's crushing it, plus look at the 20 new DRC-related articles members of the drive created this month". Or whatever. This second class of articles wouldn't be for points, of course, so the co-ords wouldn't have to worry as much about people gaming that system. 
::I know this comment is probably sacrilege to everybody with more than one competitive bone in their body, but I remember when I was a newbie editor, how special it felt to create even the most stub-like biography of a notable woman, and be told that not only I was doing something important and good, I was helping a group of like-minded people do something important and good. But, like I said, possibly only a system I would find helpful and motivating. [[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|GreenLipstickLesbian]] ([[User talk:GreenLipstickLesbian|talk]]) 06:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
:::I really like the idea of keeping track of things collectively. It'd be fun if, say, there was a tracker saying "We've worked on articles about X out of 173 developing countries, including Y out of 45 least developed countries," so that people get inspired to bring the number up. <span class="nowrap">— <span style="font-family: monospace;">[[User:Vigilantcosmicpenguin|'''Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧''']]</span> <small>([[User talk:Vigilantcosmicpenguin|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contribs/Vigilantcosmicpenguin|contribs]])</small></span> 10:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
::::Yeah that’d be cool [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 13:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
::::i like that idea as well! <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 13:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
:Question 1: I think we should use an eliminating system every month, like the WikiCup.
:Question 2: The contest is already the best it can be.
:Will post my other reflections later. <code>[[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]]</code> 04:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:TheNuggeteer|TheNuggeteer]]: My thoughts on eliminations are much the same as they were [[Wikipedia talk:Developing Countries WikiContest/Archive 1#rounds|before the contest]] — I believe they don't serve the purpose of the DCWC very well. The WikiCup uses eliminations to encourage competitiveness and lets people show off their editing skill when they qualify for the next round, but I look at this contest more through the lens of a backlog drive; any participation contributes towards the end goal of combating systemic bias. It's also worth noting that we were receiving a good number of submissions from people in the middle of the table even towards the end of the contest who probably would have been eliminated at that point if we used the WikiCup format. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 15:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
:I feel that there should be other ways to judge article vitality than just whether they are (X) in (Country) articles; maybe vital articles could also get a +50%? <small> [[User:Generalissima|Generalissima]] ([[User talk:Generalissima|talk]]) (it/she) </small>  13:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:Generalissima|Generalissima]]: That's definitely a good point you bring up and, for the record, we received exactly zero "[[Wikipedia:Developing_Countries_WikiContest/2024/Scoring#From_relation_to_developing_countries|high-level articles]]" during the contest, which is a pretty clear sign we need to rework that area of the scoring. Using vital articles comes with its own issues, though. VAs largely represent what editors think are important topics, and since most editors come from the Global North, there is a systemic bias inherent to that process. This is not necessarily a problem with VAs, just an observation that their goals are not entirely aligned with the goals of the DCWC. One idea I had was to extend our original definition of high-level articles to include third-level country articles as well — for example, [[South Africa]] is a first-level article, [[Culture of South Africa]] (a section of the main article) is second-level, and [[Cuisine of South Africa]] is third-level. Unlike the first two, we did receive a few submissions in this third level. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 16:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]] could you use the 'Top importance' categories for the WikiProjects of developing countries? And a few more related WikiProjects specific to developing countries [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 17:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
::::Using the importance categories has the same issue as vital articles: who decides how important a topic is? With WikiProject importance, it's almost always a single editor — a step down from VAs, which require at least a local discussion and consensus. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 21:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
:::agree with all of the above - i definitely think we should rework the "higher-level" system, which was basically just an experiment on my part, but i'm not sure ''exactly'' how. i would be cool with extending down to "third-level" articles as well. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 13:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
:This was my first time participating in a points-based contest such as this one. I have participated in [[WP:The Core Contest]] a few times, which has quite a different focus, looking at individual article improvement. That may have affected my view, as I did feel a bit disconnected towards the end as the focus on the competition seemed purely about the points rather than the issue the content was meant to be tackling. There are understandable practical reasons for the point system used, which might be tricky to get around, but it feels like treating the means of the competition as the end goal. I don't have an immediate solution on hand, but there is a disconnect between a competition meant to address a specific content issue and progress reports and overall results that make limited mention of said content issue. (Writing too much on this risks repeating GreenLipstickLesbian's thoughts above, which seem to come from a similar place.){{pb}}This impersonal and by-numbers design may also be related to the issues with new editors. I know one editor who wasn't sure whether an article they worked on would qualify, and by the time we discussed it, the seven-day rule prevented its addition, so they ended up not participating. It's a very unexpected rule for a competition intending to improve coverage of undercovered areas and feels like an anachronism inherited from WikiCup's focus on point scoring as the goal and its structure of culling competitors each round.{{pb}}I don't have ideas for scoring (possibly related to my feeling the competition is too focused on score already), but it does feel like there could be a few more awards, or perhaps even progress worth mentioning even if there was no award. A points multiplier was given for "least developed" countries, was there an editor who got the highest multiplier? It has been mentioned above that there were no "Country relation bonus points". This is understandable given how difficult those articles are, with the multiplier in no way making up for the additional effort needed compared to creating 2 less broad articles, and the various "levels" of articles being an unintuitive concept. (The incentivised activity seems to be to find a list of related potential articles of similar structures that can be developed with a short format.) If the idea is to incentivise broader articles, the competition could look at these on their own. Are there contenders for developing the broadest article?{{pb}}Lastly, one idea that could address some of these questions even for the current competition, why not in addition to the leaderboard, sum up the global results? How many countries had articles submitted in the competition, and which countries stood out as most improved? Were there any particular themes of improvement, such as the Olympics? What was the overall addition of FAs, GAs, DYKs, or other qualitative or quantitative improvements in the "area often underlooked by editors" the competition was set up to tackle? <small>While I was writing this, others proposed similar ideas above, I think they would be a helpful addition to the overall summary of results.</small> [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 17:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
::<small>(pinging @[[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|GreenLipstickLesbian]] because i'm responding to her comments as well to some extent)</small> i definitely agree with and see your points about the impersonal nature & challenges associated with the WikiCup-style system we used. the main reason we went with this points system based on established venues of content assessment (GAN, FAC, DYK, etc) is because as coords, we simply ''cannot'' assess all of those articles' progress ourselves, nor should we be expected to. as much as i'd love to give points for a well-written start-class article without it having to go through DYK, that's just way too subjective and time-consuming for the coordinators to do—it'd be unfair for both the participants and the coords. so, as imperfect as it is, i do not know of a better way to do it. The Core Contest's system works because each editor is only submitting one article, and there is only one winner—very different from the DCWC and WikiCup. also, we certainly can create more specialized awards, but we need ideas for them!{{pb}}i also agree with how unintuitive the "higher-level" articles thing is, and that was something i came up with as an initial rough idea, but never really got much feedback on; that wasn't supposed to be the final form. {{pb}}we thought about tallying up how many countries were covered in total because that would be a cool thing to be able to analyze, but i'll be honest: going through every single submissions page and trying to count seems really difficult and time-consuming. next year, i think it would be good to keep a running count of the countries covered as vigilantcosmicpenguin suggested above, and maybe create a map or something.{{pb}}regarding GLL's comparison with WiR, the issue here is similar to what i outlined above: the coordinators will not be able to keep up with assessing article creations, and it will be a subjective and unfair nightmare for us to individually assess whether each new article meets basic criteria. as i said, i would love to reward editors for creating nicely-sourced stubs and starts (especially because the DYK system is so unintuitive & often very backlogged) but we have to balance that with incentivizing mass-creation/translation of crappy, poorly-sourced articles. there has to be some baseline of quality for it to be fair (and ''actually'' improve coverage) and we just can't assess all of them them ourselves. that's why we have a compromise of giving points for DYKs, because it involves some quality assessment for new articles without putting a huge overload on the coords. like, if half of those 20 DRC-related articles were five sentence stubs sourced to a blog and a couple of local news sites, that wouldn't reflect very well on the DCWC. in short, we can't be AfC reviewers. however, that said, i do like the idea of having non-points-based measures of progress, and i want to develop that concept further.{{pb}}i welcome any other concrete suggestions and ideas on how to improve the contest. <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 18:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
:::I mean, when you're running a contest, you sort of have to trust that nobody's going to go all Lugnuts or Doug Coldwell at it. Wikipedia tends to assume that good faith and a base level of competence, especially when it comes to stuff like WiR, NPP drives, ect. Even if we do find an editor messing up big time in one of those areas, the community tends to blame the editor rather than the system. But it depends what your goals are, really. WiR and similar programs are amazingly effective at reducing systemic bias, the Wikicup is great at encouraging already very good editors to carry on doing what they're doing.  But you're going to have to either compromise on quality checks, or really limit who can participate. Or somebody will be really smart and come up with a perfect solution. 
:::That being said, Sawyer, there's nothing I enjoy doing more than spending a Saturday looking through all the submissions pages and seeing what we all did. It's going in a separate post, but I did a break-down in my [[User:GreenLipstickLesbian/sandbox7|sandbox]] if anybody else wants to correct my figures or play with some data. [[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|GreenLipstickLesbian]] ([[User talk:GreenLipstickLesbian|talk]]) 22:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
::::i hear you about assuming good faith, but i'm not even talking about a lugnuts or DC situation - just briefly reviewing dozens or even hundreds of new articles that are ''good'' would still take up a lot of time and i think it's just out of scope for this event unless we can get enough people to commit to doing that work, or come up with some kind of concrete plan for it. speaking personally, i moved from the US to Ireland and started university during the course of the contest, and was unable to review submissions for a few weeks - can't speak for Ixtal's situation, but it left TS as essentially the sole acting coordinator for a non-insignificant amount of time. if we had been getting submissions of new articles on top of our existing load, it would've probably been entirely dysfunctional. we have to be able to accommodate situations like that for the future as well.<br>also, wow! thank you for making that sandbox, it's very interesting :) <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
:As promised, separate post with some super-basic stats! There's some overcount for sure (I am merely human, and didn't put in any effort to split dual-GA nominations and dual-DYK nominations), but here's some basic estimates for everybody to enjoy! (In terms of creations. Sorry, reviewers, the overcount would have gotten too bad if I'd included your activities!)
:Overall, members of the drive managed to create or substantially improve content concerning a grand total of '''86''' different countries. 86! That's pretty impressive - and, coincidentally, the telephone country code for China. A pretty amazing coincidence, considering which country's coverage members of the drive improved the most. 
:The top five most-improved countries were:
::1. {{flagicon|CHN}}'''China''', with 1 featured list, 6 GAs, and 13 DYK appearances
::2. {{flagicon|IND}}'''India''', with 1 featured list, 15 GAs, and 1 ITN appearance
::3. {{flagicon|PHL}}'''Philippines''', with 5 GAs and 7 DYK appearances
::4. {{flagicon|PRK}}'''North Korea''', with 2 GAs and 9 DYK appearances
::5. {{flagicon|KIR}}'''Kiribati ''', with 10 GAs and 4 DYK appearances
:and then, more individually: 
:By terms of GAs submitted:
::1. {{flagicon|IND}}'''India''' with 15
::2. {{flagicon|CHN}}'''China''' with 6
::2. {{flagicon|KIR}}'''Kiribati''' with 6
::2. {{flagicon|HTI}}'''Haiti''' with 6
::3. {{flagicon|PHL}}'''Philippines''' with 5
:By terms of DYKs submitted:
::1. {{flagicon|CHN}}'''China''' with 13
::2. {{flagicon|PRK}}'''North Korea''' with 9
::3. {{flagicon|PHL}}'''Philippines''' with 7
:But just because we improved those countries so much, doesn't mean we forgot about the rest. Members of the drive found time to get either a single GA, FA, or DYK for 49 individual countries. Most impressive of those were the two countries that got "only" a featured article: {{flagicon|IRQ}}[[Siege of Baghdad|Iraq]] and {{flagicon|GRL}}[[Qalaherriaq|Greenland]], brought to you by  @[[User:AirshipJungleman29|AirshipJungleman29]]and @[[User:Generalissima|Generalissima]]. If you haven't already, you should take the time to read both of their articles. They're some of the best that Wikipedia has to offer. 
:Members of the drive also managed to get 3 important deaths (those of presenter {{flagicon|IND}} [[Aparna (television presenter)|Aparna]], wrestler {{flagicon|ASM}}[[Afa Anoaʻi]], and former PM of {{flagicon|LBN}} Lebanon [[Salim Al-Huss]]) featured In The News. These appearances were brought to us by two editors in particular: @[[User:Vacant0|Vacant0]]and @[[User:Jaguarnik|Jaguarnik]]. Everybody else, this is who you have to beat next year!
:We also got plenty of lists - 10 in total, covering 8 different countries! (Three of these lists covered {{flagicon|UKR}} Ukraine) To the uninitiated such as myself, the featured list process may appear somewhat strange, but not to editors such as @[[User:MPGuy2824|MPGuy2824]], with their impressive 3 FLS and 7 FLRs, @[[User:Vanderwaalforces|Vanderwaalforces]], who wrote Wikipedia's first ''ever'' {{flagicon|NGA}}[[National symbols of Nigeria|Nigeria-related FL]], @[[User:Dantheanimator|Dantheanimator]] with the 3 Ukraine-related FLs, and @[[User:48JCL|48JCL]]with their fascinating {{flagicon|BWA}}[[List of World Heritage Sites in Botswana]]. 
:Let's look at a breakdown by continent:
:The continent we worked on the most was easily Africa, with 36 countries represented. Second place was Asia with 19, followed by the Americas with 15. Oceania got 10, and Europe came in last with 7 countries represented. I bet no other Wiki-drive's ever had that result before!
:In terms of content, a special shout-out has to go to @[[User:Vigilantcosmicpenguin|Vigilantcosmicpenguin]]for their series about Abortion in various African countries- not only did they bring [[Abortion in Africa]] through the DYK process, but they brought 11 different country-specific articles through as well. Not content at that, however, they also had to pause and turn {{flagicon|SLE}}[[Abortion in Sierra Leone]] into a Good Article too! In terms of eliminating systemic bias, the importance of their contributions cannot be overstated. 
:And while we're talking about Olympic feats, let's pause and appreciate the efforts of @[[User:Arconning|Arconning]]. They made 1 Olympic related Featured List, 7 Olympic related good articles, and then went above and beyond to get 3 of those articles through the DYK process as well. Talk about gold medalists!
:But speaking of sports, @[[User:BeanieFan11|BeanieFan11]]saw the need to improve the articles on athletes from developing nations, and they more than rose to the challenge. But in between their GAs on NFL members, and DYKs on various athletes (did you know that Olympian judokan [[Valentin Houinato]], from {{flagicon|BEN}}Benin, is also a journalist?), they also substantially expanded or created articles on three different politicians! One of those politicians being current Prime Minister of {{flagicon|GNQ}}Equatorial Guinea, [[Manuel Osa Nsue Nsua]].
:While we're learning so many cool things, let me tell you all how our coverage of {{flagicon|KIR}}[[Kiribati]] improved so much. @[[User:Thebiguglyalien|Thebiguglyalien]]is responsible for five of our new Kiribati-themed good articles, and all four of its DYK appearances. And did you know how they got all those DYK appearances in just one hook? [[Template:Did you know nominations/1978 Gilbertese Chief Minister election|Find out for yourself here!]]
:In a similar vein, if {{flagicon|IND}}India placed so high, it's only because of dedicated writers like @[[User:Magentic Manifestations|Magentic Manifestations]], who made India-related articles about a wide array of topics, from [[Verghese Kurien|dairy engineers]] to [[Madras Crocodile Bank Trust|crocodile trusts]], into some Good-capital-G Articles.
:And while I may not have focused on reviews too much, I am going to take a minute to highlight the contributions of our most prolific reviewer, @[[User:Simongraham|Simongraham]]. They wrote Good Articles on seven different species and genuses of arthropods (mostly jumping spiders, from what it seems), and two different USSR ships. Those with [[arachnophobia]] beware, but those who create species stubs, be even warier, for this is the type of editor we all wish we had more of. 
:Hopefully all the spider-phobes haven't left by now, because who isn't going to love this next topic? That's right, who wants to read about chocolate? @[[User:Yue|Yue]]managed to write three articles on [[Cocoa production in São Tomé and Príncipe|chocolate production]], [[Cocoa smuggling|chocolate smuggling]], and a [[Choco Togo|chocolate manufacturer]], and they even made one into a Good Article. But they didn't stop there! Those of you interested in the flags of the world, you need look no further than their new Good Articles on the flags of {{flagicon|TGO}}[[Flag of Togo|Togo]], {{flagicon|PRK}}[[Flag of North Korea|North Korea]], {{flagicon|STP}}[[Flag of São Tomé and Príncipe|São Tomé and Príncipe]], or {{flagicon|RWA}}[[Flag of Rwanda|Rwanda]].
:This Wikicup may not have seen many - or, actually, any Good Topics, but one user came close: @[[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]]! They wrote five Good Articles about fisheries in the {{flagicon|PHL}}Philippines, after finding out just how lacking we were. Generalissima's been prodding them to turn the entire thing into a Good Topic. And who knows, hopefully she'll have convinced them by next year? No pressure or anything, but all eyes are on you now, Chipmunkdavis!
:@[[User:Di (they-them)|Di (they-them)]] did what they do best and told us all about the time "that [[Germany–Samoa relations|German officials]] exiled the {{flagicon|WSM}}Samoan king from his own kingdom". In light of the recent Olympics, @[[User:Riley1012|Riley1012]] helped to expand our coverage of artistic gymnasts from around the world. @[[User:TheNuggeteer|TheNuggeteer]] brought you coverage of {{flagicon|PHL}}Philippines storms, @[[User:Averageuntitleduser|Averageuntitleduser]] wrote Good Articles on {{flagicon|HTI}}[[Marie-Jeanne Lamartinière|important Haitian women]], and @[[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] proved that you can write {{flagicon|ARG}}[[The Eternaut|a Good Article]] on pop-culture topics after all! @[[User:PerfectSoundWhatever|PerfectSoundWhatever]] introduced us to the life and works of {{flagicon|KEN}} Kenyan musician [[KMRU]], @[[User:Noorullah21|Noorullah21]]wrote an impressive 1k+ word GA on the {{flagicon|IND}}[[Khalji Revolution]], and @[[User:Skyshifter|Skyshifter]] got meta and treated us to hoax article! As in, {{flagicon|BRA}}[[Carlos Bandeirense Mirandópolis hoax|a good article about a hoax article]]. You'll just have to read it for yourself. @[[User:Fritzmann2002|Fritzmann2002]] specialised in article and list reviews, but took the time to write some good articles on {{flagicon|SYR}}[[Hypericum sect. Adenotrias|plants from Syria]] and {{flagicon|TUR}}[[Hypericum minutum|Turkey]].
:Some of us were busy during the contest, however- but in a drive such as this, literally every attempt counts. With that in mind, let's take some time to appreciate @[[User:Sohom Datta|Sohom Datta]]'s {{flagicon|IND}}[[Talk:Electronic voting in India/GA1|review of a GA about voting in India]], @[[User:TappyTurtle|TappyTurtle]]'s {{flagicon|BRA}}[[Talk:Carlos Bandeirense Mirandópolis hoax/GA1|review of the article about the Wikipedia hoax]], @[[User:Zanahary|Zanahary]] {{flagicon|IND}}[[Talk:Kartikeya/GA1| review of an article about an Indian god of war]], @[[User:SunTunnels|SunTunnels]]'s article about a {{flagicon|ZAF}}[[Aniya Holder|South African speed-climber]], and @[[User:Queen of Hearts|Queen of Hearts]]'s article on {{flagicon|CHN}}[[Gothus teemo|a crab named after a League of Legends character]].
:I'd also like to say thank you to our lovely co-ordinators, Sawyer777, Ixtal, and TechnoSquirrel69. It may sound cheesy, but it's true- none of this would have happened without your ideas and dedication. [[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|GreenLipstickLesbian]] ([[User talk:GreenLipstickLesbian|talk]]) 22:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
::haven't actually finished reading it all yet but this is wonderful - i've got a signpost draft at [[User:Sawyer777/DCWC signpost]] - would you mind if i paste this in as a section and add your name? <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 22:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Sawyer777|Sawyer777]] If you get to the end and still feel that way, then feel free! I enjoyed looking through everybody's articles and writing it. [[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|GreenLipstickLesbian]] ([[User talk:GreenLipstickLesbian|talk]]) 23:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|GreenLipstickLesbian]]: I had to take a few days off from my coordinator hat so I'm a little late to the party. Thank you so much for putting this together! It was a very satisfying and heart-warming read — also, aww, thanks for that last bit! :) I think you've seen that Sawyer copied this into the proposed ''Signpost'' article, which will be a nice way to get it some more airtime. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 02:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
* Don't have time right now to give any thorough reply but two quick suggestions about the contest: 1. expand/eliminate the "nomination window" (maybe have it that participants have to submit their nominations by the end of the month that their nomination is passed/promoted/posted/etc.?) & 2. as a optional thing, which I feel like is a good incentive, but make it that participants with the most submissions for a specific country get that country's barnstar (e.g. a barnstar should be given for every country with at least one submission in the contest). Just some thoughts... thanks again all for the fun contest! :) [[User:Dantheanimator|Dan]] [[User talk:Dantheanimator|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Dantheanimator|Animator]] 00:05, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*:i support doing away with the nomination window, as that also removes one extra consideration for the coords & makes things a bit easier on everyone. & i also like your second suggestion, and would add that we could keep our current most-submissions-for-any-one-country as just an ''extra special'' edition of the award, so to speak <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 00:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*:: {{tq|make it that participants with the most submissions for a specific country get that country's barnstar (e.g. a barnstar should be given for every country with at least one submission in the contest)}} – well, FWIW that would have meant I would've received at least 34 different country barnstars :) [[User:BeanieFan11|BeanieFan11]] ([[User talk:BeanieFan11|talk]]) 00:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*:::true... your talk page got enough bother the other day as it is! <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 00:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*::::I actually thought that "a barnstar should be given for every country with at least one submission in the contest" was the existing plan, I read "the most submissions for any one country will receive a themed barnstar for that country" as applying to each "one country", not overall for all countries. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 01:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*:::::it seems like a lot of people thought that, as i remember there being confusion about it before the contest started. however, i still really don't know how the special award could've been reworded to make it clearer that we were only planning on doing it for one country.... anywho, we've got awhile to figure that out now <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 13:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*::::::Maybe every unique country submission receives a themed barnstar? [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 14:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*::::::: <small>Then I'd get 25 barnstars instead of 34! :) [[User:BeanieFan11|BeanieFan11]] ([[User talk:BeanieFan11|talk]]) 17:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)</small>
*I don't know if this was covered above, but the bonus points for what were called "higher-level" articles were way off the mark. Upgrading a country-level article probably requires ''at least'' 15x more effort than your average article, not 2x. I think one possible solution would be using the importance scales of WikiProjects—say 10x for top-importance, and 5x/2x for the lower levels? [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 14:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*:agreed about the bonus points scaling. the issue, imo, with wikiproject importance is that it's usually decided by one random person adding the wikiproject template and can be extremely subjective - there's no real standardization for that, unlike vital articles (which also have their own problems as mentioned above) <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 14:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*::How subjective can it really get? [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 14:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*:::We can't use Wikiproject importance rankings, they're meaningless. I'm unaware of any country Wikiproject doing something functional with them. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 15:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*:::Looking at [[:Category:Myanmar articles by importance|WikiProjecy Myanmar importance]] as an example, [[State Seal of Myanmar]] is listed as top importance alongside the country itself, [[Wa State]] is listed as low importance while the [[Wa Self-Administered Division]] is listed as mid importance, and there are more unrated Myanmar articles than Top, High, and Mid combined. [[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#324717">The</span><span style="color:#45631f">big</span><span style="color:#547826">ugly</span><span style="color:#68942f">alien</span>]] ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:sienna">talk</span>]]) 15:35, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
*::::thank you for providing those examples lol. for what it's worth, i've reassessed Wa State as high-importance & the state seal as mid-importance <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 17:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
* Is there a mailing list so interested people could be notified about future contests? I very rarely use Discord, and would prefer something on-wiki. (Also thanks to everyone for creating this.) [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 18:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
*:yes, we can set up a mailing list once we get closer to the next contest - i think it's safe to say there will be another one, and we'll keep this page updated with any new developments! <span style="color:#618A3D">... [[User:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">sawyer</span>]] * <small>he/they</small> * [[User talk:Sawyer777|<span style="color:#618A3D">talk</span>]]</span> 18:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
*:Go ahead and add yourself to [[Wikipedia:Developing Countries WikiContest/2024/Mass message recipients|this list]] for now, and I'll make a note to import you over to next year's mailing list when that happens. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span>]]</span> <small>([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>]])</small> 19:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
*::Thanks so much! [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 19:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)