View source for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montessori-Based Dementia Programming

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was    '''keep'''. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 04:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
===[[Montessori-Based Dementia Programming]]===

:{{la|Montessori-Based Dementia Programming}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Montessori-Based Dementia Programming|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montessori-Based Dementia Programming]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montessori-Based Dementia Programming|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 October 3#{{anchorencode:Montessori-Based Dementia Programming}}|View log]])</noinclude>

Therapy program developed by nn doctor and research institute (who, based on their website, appear to exist to sell training and products related to this program). Not affliated with any [[Montessori]] organisation. One self-sourced external link, two non-working external links. Article started as obvious cut-and-paste copyvio and is maintained and promulgated by a series of [[WP:SPA|single purpose accounts]]. [[User:Delicious carbuncle|Delicious carbuncle]] ([[User talk:Delicious carbuncle|talk]]) 17:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Social science|list of Social science-related deletion discussions]].  </small> <small>-- [[User:Fabrictramp|<span style="color:#960018;font-family:comic sans ms;">Fabrictramp</span>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<span style="color:#960018;font-family:Papyrus;">talk to me</span>]] 21:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)</small>
<hr style="width:50%;"/>
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->

*'''Delete''' No evidence of [[WP:N|notability]] provided. The article does not sound neutral, suggesting that someone with connected with the subject created the article (this is just a suggestion, I cannot back that up, other than by giving my interpretation of the text). Nevertheless, this article does not cite [[WP:RS|reliable]] or [[WP:V|verifiable sources]]. [[User:PeterSymonds|PeterSymonds]] [[User talk:PeterSymonds|<small>(talk)</small>]] 16:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. The article makes claims of notability in respect of various prizes. They are readily verified using Google. The references are pitifully inadequate and I question the validity of the technique, but there is in fact sufficient coverage (in AARP write-ups, etc.). [[User:Bongomatic|Bongomatic]] ([[User talk:Bongomatic|talk]]) 07:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
**It's not clear to me that these are notable awards, nor do the article's references link to them. The claim of notability is not [[WP:VERIFY|verified]]. [[User:Delicious carbuncle|Delicious carbuncle]] ([[User talk:Delicious carbuncle|talk]]) 12:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
<hr style="width:50%;"/>
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Aervanath|Aervanath]] [[User talk:Aervanath|lives]] [[Special:Contributions/Aervanath|in]] ''[[WP:O|<b style="color:green;">the Orphanage</b>]]'' 06:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*<small>'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Medicine|list of Medicine-related deletion discussions]].  </small> <small>-- [[User:VasileGaburici|VG]] [[User_talk:VasileGaburici|&#x260E;]] 06:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' per [http://scholar.google.be/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Montessori-Based+Dementia+Programming%22&btnG=Search this] and [http://scholar.google.be/scholar?q=Montessori+dementia&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search this] on Google Scholar. There are over 300 articles in the scientific literature, although this exact title seems to be a trademarked version of the method (which also has scientific publications). --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 10:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
**Note that most, if not all, of the papers that turn up in the first search were authored by doctors from the aforementioned institute. [[User:Delicious carbuncle|Delicious carbuncle]] ([[User talk:Delicious carbuncle|talk]]) 12:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. It does appear notable enough. It is a well published method by the original finders/authors and the term is used in articles by other authors. [[User:Ciar|<span style="color:#9F1D35;">'''~ Ciar ~'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Ciar|<sub style="color:DarkViolet;">'''(Talk to me!)'''</sub>]] 18:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', as {{PMID|10750318}} on the subject has been cited 29 times, which is quite a high impact. [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&client=firefox-a&cites=16975777651370492516 citing articles] [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 18:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>