View source for User:VisitingPhilosopher/Archive 1/list formatting

</blockquote>  {{cquote|<Small>'''''Even if I disagree with what you have to say, I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it.'''''<Small>}}
</div></center>
<br>
[[File:LibertyEqualityorDeath.jpg|Center|200px]]


[[Template:Navbox_with_columns#See_also|Navboxes compared]]

[[Parable of the long spoons]]

[[Fable of the long spoons]]

#REDIRECT [[Allegory of the long spoons]]

interesting way to EDIT the redirect page -  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parable_of_the_long_spoons&redirect=no example edit-redirect-link]

{{Love sidebar}}

"normal" table.

{| class="wikitable" style="margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; width:auto; text-align:center; font-size:90%;"
|+ <span style="font-size:130%;">Navigation templates comparison</span>
|- style="line-height:10pt;"
!style="text-align:left; padding-left:4px;"| 1. jump to<br\>section
! 2. Collapsible !! 3. Header color
! 4. Image !! 5. Groups !! 6. Style (body)<br/>parameter/s !! 7.Examples
|-
|style="text-align:left;"| {{tl|Navbox}}
| {{yes2}} collapsible ||style="background:#ccccff;"| navbox
| {{yes2}} Left/right of body || {{yes}} || {{yes}}|| {{tl|United States Congress}}{{dot}} {{tl|Solar System}}
|-
|style="text-align:left;"| {{tl|Navbox with columns}}
| {{yes2}} collapsible ||style="background:#ccccff;"| navbox
| {{yes2}} Left/right of columns || {{no}} || {{yes}} || {{tl|Current U.S. Senators}}{{dot}} {{tl|Czech lands}}
|-
|style="text-align:left;"| 1. {{tl|Navbox with collapsible groups}}
| 2. {{yes2}} collapsible ||style="background:#ccccff;"| navbox
| 4. {{yes2}} Left/right of body and/or in each list|| 5. {{yes}} || 6. {{yes}} || 7. {{tl|University of Michigan}}{{dot}} {{tl|Scouting}}
|}

{| class="wikitable" style="margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; width:auto; text-align:center; font-size:90%;"
|+ <span style="font-size:130%;">Collapsible attributes</span>
|- style="line-height:10pt;"
! | Type !! CSS classes !! Javascript !! Collapses when !! Custom<br/>initial&nbsp;state !! Nesting
|-
|align="left"| [[Help:Collapsing|Collapsible tables]]
| collapsible
| Defined in [[MediaWiki:Common.js|Common.js]]
| 2 or more autocollapse on page || {{yes}} || {{yes}}
|}<noinclude>



=== Policy adherence notes ===
As a new editor on Wikipedia, I have tried to show below how this new section (text above) adheres to the Wikipedia policies which I have read.
Please let me know if there are any relevant policies which I have missed.
Please let me know if more detail is required in any of the policy adherence notes for this new section I am proposing to add.  See the table and following sections.

Policies adhered to: 
[[WP:HOWTO]]
[[WP:VER]]
[[WP:NPOV]]
[[WP:N]]
[[WP:NEO]]
[[WP:SYN]]
[[WP:ADVERT]]
[[WP:ESSAY]]
[[WP:OPINION]]
[[WP:ORIG]]

== New article policy-paste ==
{| class="toccolours collapsible collapsed" width=100% align="center"
|-
! style="background:#dff2f3"|EXAMPLE COLLAPSED COMMENT ARCHIVE  1.
|-
|

== Message to srich32977 & response ==
Why?
Why are you delinking perfectly valid Wikilinks saying they are ''"redundant"'' when they clearly are not. I'm talking about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sylvia_Browne&diff=prev&oldid=374571979 this], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Randi&diff=prev&oldid=374569028 this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Psychic&diff=prev&oldid=374568306 this] etc. [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] ([[User talk:Moriori|talk]]) 22:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
:Not so.  I just looked at Sylvia Browne, which you reverted.  Randi, paranormal, Larry King etc. are all redundant redundant.  But revert away if you must.  It is no skin off my teeth.  I enjoy editing. (Perhaps Sylvia can answer why you like unneeded wikilinks!) --S. Rich 23:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
::Can you explain what you mean by ''"Randi, paranormal, Larry King etc. are all redundant redundant"''? [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] ([[User talk:Moriori#top|talk]]) 00:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
|}
{| class="toccolours collapsible collapsed" width=100% align="center"
|-
! style="background:#dff2f3"|Fundació Suñol
|-
|  
== Fundació Suñol article. ==
I introduced the information about Fundació Suñol twice, in 2008 and today.
The information that I included was written by me, and sites as www.barcelona.com or other touristic websites are using this text because we send it almost two years ago. Could you please reaccept my article. I think it's important that Fundació Suñol appears in wikipedia (as already does in other many languages), because is an important museum in the city.
Please, visit the website: www.fundaciosunol.org
Xavier de Luca  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:FundaSunol|FundaSunol]] ([[User talk:FundaSunol|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FundaSunol|contribs]]) 10:09, 21 July 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
|}
{| class="toccolours collapsible collapsed" width=100% align="center"
|-
! style="background:#dff2f3"|Su-30 MK1
|-
|
== Su-30 MKI ==
Just to clarify, all Su-30MKIs use the AL-31 engine which until 2010 was only manufactured in Russia. Also, I have corrected the wording to state indigenously assembled (which is different from indigenously manufactured). Should that suffice or would you prefer the wording as it was? [[User:Vedant|Vedant]] ([[User talk:Vedant|talk]]) 03:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
:Oh, ok.  I think people would generally interpret an ''indigenous'' (Indian built) aircraft to be Indian built, so it would be informative to explain that it had a Russian engine. But specifying "assembled" would fix the prob. [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] ([[User talk:Moriori#top|talk]]) 03:55, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
::I understand the confusion, I was actually just about to correct that. AFAIK, all the components used in the aircraft today are being manufactured in India (including the engine) per [http://www.hindu.com/2009/08/20/stories/2009082061901100.htm this] although previous aircraft were manufactured using kits supplied from Russia. [[User:Vedant|Vedant]] ([[User talk:Vedant|talk]]) 04:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
|}
{| class="toccolours collapsible collapsed" width=100% align="center"
|-
! style="background:#dff2f3"|2005 election
|-
|
== 2005 election ==

Moriori, please reconsider what you are doing at that article. The lead version you've restored reads, "The '''2005 New Zealand general election''' held on 17 September 2005 determined the composition of the [[48th New Zealand Parliament]]. No [[political party|party]] won a majority in the [[Unicameralism|unicameral]] [[New Zealand Parliament|House of Representatives]], but the [[New Zealand Labour Party|Labour Party]] of [[Prime Minister of New Zealand|Prime Minister]] [[Helen Clark]] secured two more seats than nearest rival, the [[New Zealand National Party|National Party]] of Dr [[Don Brash]]. With the exception of the newly-formed [[Māori Party]], which took four [[Māori seats]] from Labour, most of the other parties polled lower than in the previous election, losing votes and seats."
That version contains several unnecessary pieces of information (there is no need to state that the New Zealand parliament is unicameral there, for example), and some misleading statements (the Labour Party was not a party "of" Helen Clark, since it does not belong to her personally). I cannot see a good reason to restore a version that contains such things. [[User:Linbit|Linbit]] ([[User talk:Linbit|talk]]) 08:08, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
|}
{| class="toccolours collapsible collapsed" width=100% align="center"
|-
! style="background:#dff2f3"|Deleting pagesl
|-
|
==Deleting pages==
When you delete pages, it would be helpful to warn the users who created them with a speedy notice, or else they will just keep doing it and they can never be reported to AIV, since there is no record on their talk page of what they have done. Regards, '''[[User:wackywace|<span style="color:#00A947;">WackyWace</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:wackywace|<span style="color:black;">converse</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Wackywace|<span style="color:black;">contribs</span>]]</sup> 09:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
|}

=== [[WP:POLICY|Wikipedia policy]] adherence notes ===
Below shows how the text in the article adheres to Wikipedia policies.

Please add any relevant policies which should also be considered, below.

Also, please add comments if more detail is required for any of the policy adherence notes below.

::: Dear Editor, Please feel encouraged to be free to edit the article, and be [[WP:BOLD|bold]].  If your additions require re-phrasing, then please note it is because of the Wikipedia policies below and not a reflection on your contribution - please do not be offended if your additions are changed.   Many thanks.  [[User:VisitingPhilosopher|VisitingPhilosopher]] ([[User talk:VisitingPhilosopher|talk]]) 21:55, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

=== Article Review - [[WP:POLICY|Wikipedia policy]] adherence notes ===
Below shows how the text in the article adheres to Wikipedia policies.

Please add any relevant policies which should also be considered, below.

Any further reviewers, please add comments if more detail is required for any of the policy adherence notes below.

Policies checked in this review: 
[[WP:HOWTO]]
[[WP:VER]]
[[WP:NPOV]]
[[WP:N]]
[[WP:NEO]]
[[WP:SYN]]
[[WP:ADVERT]]
[[WP:ESSAY]]
[[WP:OPINION]]
[[WP:ORIG]]
[[WP:ENC]]
[[WP:MOS]]

 - edit #1 -
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Policy !! Comment !! Policy quote !! Evidence
|-
| Shortcode || Notes from 3rd parties  || . || .
|-
| [[WP:NEO]] || . || Not a neologism || [http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=intitle%3A%22Learned+industriousness%22 see here]
|-
| [[WP:VER]] || . || Verifiable sources || .
|-
| [[WP:N]] || . || Notable || [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Learned+industriousness%22 see here]
|-
| [[WP:NPOV]] || . || Neutral || [[#Neutrality|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:ORIG]] || . || No original research || [[#Originality|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:ESSAY]] || . || No essays, no original thought or opinions. || .
|-
| [[WP:ADVERT]] || . || No adverts, no external links whatsoever. || .
|- 
| [[WP:SYN]] || . || No synthesis of ideas. || .
|-
| [[WP:HOWTO]] || . || No guide-like sentences || [[#Howto|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:OPINION]] || . || No personal opinions || .
|-
| [[WP:LISTPURP]] || . || Acts as navigation within wikipedia and the list appears in secondary sources || .
|-
| [[WP:MOS]] || . || Manual of style - grammar conventions etc || [[#Review edits|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:ENC]] || . || Encyclopedic || .
|-
| [[WP:ESSAY]] || . || Not an essay - refs for each sentence, so not an essay. || .
|-
| [[WP:NOTPAPER]] || . || Keeping articles to a reasonable size is important for Wikipedia's accessibility. || .
|-
| . || . || . || .
|}

=== Article Review - [[WP:POLICY|Wikipedia policy]] adherence approach taken ===
Below shows how the text in the article adheres to all Wikipedia policies.

Please add any relevant policies which should also be considered, below.

Any further reviewers, please add comments if more detail is required for any of the policy adherence notes below.

Policies checked in this review: 
[[WP:HOWTO]]
[[WP:VER]]
[[WP:NPOV]]
[[WP:N]]
[[WP:NEO]]
[[WP:SYN]]
[[WP:ADVERT]]
[[WP:ESSAY]]
[[WP:OPINION]]
[[WP:ORIG]]
[[WP:LISTPURP]]
[[WP:ENC]]
[[WP:MOS]]
[[WP:NOTPAPER]]
.
The table below shows how the article conforms to each of the policies, click on the "see here" link for the proof of policy adherence and usually a place to add your own comments on how the policy guidelines are met fully in the article.

 - edit #2 -
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Policy !! Comment !! Policy quote !! Evidence
|-
| Shortcode || Notes from 3rd parties  || . || .
|-
| [[WP:LISTPURP]] || . || Acts as navigation within wikipedia and the list appears in secondary sources || [[#PRS_List_is_in_secondary_sources|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:NEO]] || . || Not a neologism || [[#PRS_Not_neologism|See here]] [http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=intitle%3A%22Personal+Relationship+Skills%22 googbooks]
|-
| [[WP:VER]] || . || Verifiable sources || .
|-
| [[WP:N]] || . || Notable || [[#PRS_Notable|See here]] [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Personal+Relationship+Skills%22 google]
|-
| [[WP:NPOV]] || . || Neutral || [[#PRS_Neutrality|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:ORIG]] || . || No original research || [[#PRS_Originality|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:ESSAY]] || . || No essays, no original thought or opinions. || [[#PRS_Originality|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:ADVERT]] || . || No adverts, no external links whatsoever. || .
|- 
| [[WP:SYN]] || . || No synthesis of ideas. || [[#PRS_Originality|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:HOWTO]] || . || No guide-like sentences || [[#PRS_Howto|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:OPINION]] || . || No personal opinions || [[#PRS_Originality|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:MOS]] || . || Manual of style - grammar conventions etc || [[#Review edits|see here]]
|-
| [[WP:ENC]] || . || Encyclopedic || .
|-
| [[WP:ESSAY]] || . || Not an essay - refs for each sentence, so not an essay. || .
|-
| [[WP:NOTPAPER]] || . || Keeping articles to a reasonable size is important for Wikipedia's accessibility. || .
|-
| . || . || . || .
|}

=== PRS Not neologism, an apposite term  ===
Google searches show that the "Personal Relationship Skills" term is well established for the meaning in the head of the article, and is not a neologism - see the analysis below.

==== Evidence for "Personal relationship skills" notability ====
This is a review of the closely related terms giving the evidence of the precise taxonomy and nomenclature in this specialist psychology field.
The google search for "Personal relationship skills" stays firmly on topic - skills to be used by couples themselves - whereas other related terms have the meanings below:
# "Interpersonal skills" - these are work-related management skills - click for evidence >> [http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=intitle%3AInterPersonal+Skills Interpersonal skills]
# "Couple skills" - these are skills for counsellors - click for evidence >> [http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=intitle%3ASkills+for+couples Couple skills] -
# "Intimate relationship skills" - not notable, just 1 book uses the term, in 2012, - click for evidence >> [http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=intitle%3A%22Intimate+relationship+skills%22 Intimate relationship skills]
# "Personal relationship skills" term is notable and not a neologism - click for evidence >> [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Personal+Relationship+Skills%22 Personal relationship skills]

=== PRS Notable ===
Wikiquote uses the term - [[Wikiquote:Personal relationship]]
Google search links are shown above.

=== PRS List is in secondary sources ===
This article lists the universal themes from [[Relate#Relationship books|these relationship books]], all the skills in this list appearing in all of the books.  Therefore following the [[WP:LISTPURP]] wikipedia policy.

=== PRS Neutrality ===
A neutral tone is presented throughout the article, with no advertising tone, balanced statements are used about the article's skills subject.
The article includes a "criticism" section.  This gives statements and attribution to those who hold opinions which oppose those from the article's main sources - that personal relationship skills can be categorised and learnt.

=== PRS Originality ===
There is no original thought in the article.
There are references to notable sources for all of the statements made in the article.
With a reference for each sentence, this article is not in the nature of an essay.
There are no original opinions in the article, notable referenced sources are linked to each sentence which appears to have an opinion. 
Therefore the article conforms to these policies, see links - [[WP:ORIG]] [[WP:ESSAY]] [[WP:OPINION]]

'''Opinion policy adherence''' - link to "help the reader" policy

Secondary sources are used to show the people and organisations holding the opinions described in the article.  The [[WP:OPINION|opinion]] sources are often provided with quotes, following this policy: "The main point is to '''help the reader''' and other editors." <sub> ~ '''policy source:''' [[Wikiquote:Wikiquote:Citing_sources#When_you_add_content|help the reader]]</sub>

=== PRS Howto ===
The article is not a "howto" guide.  There is no guide-like tone in any paragraph.  All statements encompass universal themes, there are no verbs which are instructional.  The style adheres strictly to simple, broad, statements of the encyclopedic facts.

=== Review edits ===
To bring into line with [[WP:MOS]] some minor edits to the style of the original article were necessary.  No content was changed.

=== Originality ===
Conforms to [[WP:ORIG]] when there is no original thought in the article and there are references to notable sources for all of the statements made in the article.

=== Neutrality ===
A neutral tone is presented throughout the article, with no advertising tone, balanced statements are used.

== Scratchpad cheat sheet for Article History table notes ==

[[Learned industriousness]] new article used this header:

<nowiki>{{|New unreviewed article|source=ArticleWizard|date=October 2011}}</nowiki>

Possible DYK - There are 34 types of relationship therapy, but the person '''''giving'''' the therapy is more important than the type of therapy they are using. 
-- really great to use the ID method to pull up the exact old version of the article...
e.g., the DYK page.

[[Template:ArticleHistory]]

 EDIT to See "Article History" template HIDDEN in comment...>>> ''here'' 

<!--START COMMENT

{{ArticleHistory 
|action1=RBP
|action1date=21:49, 18 July 2005 
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Space opera in Scientology doctrine/archive1 
|action1result=reviewed 
|action1oldid=19107608  
|action2=PR 
|action2date=31 October 2007 
|action2link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Space opera in Scientology doctrine/archive1 
|action2result=Reviewed 
|action2oldid=162919612 
|maindate=September 10, 2005 
|dykdate=7 July 2005 
|currentstatus=FGAN
}} 

END-COMMENT 
 -->
<<

{{civility}}

'''Why Wikipedia does not keep new editors: '''
[[User_talk:Dcharris1]] "It's okay, I no longer care. Ciao".

[[Special:Whatlinkshere/User_talk:Dcharris1]]

[[Wikipedia:Arguments_to_make_in_deletion_discussions]] [[WP:MANYLINKS]]