View source for User:Σ/Testing facility/TP/Archive 7

{{Automatic archive navigator}}

== Wikidata weekly summary #76 ==

<div class="plainlinks mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr">
[[File:Wikidata-logo-en.svg|150px|right]]
<div style="margin-top:10px; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* [[d:Wikidata:Events|Events]]/[[d:Wikidata:Press coverage|Press/Blogs]]
** upcoming: UK Wikidata Training
** [http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=72 Magnus blogged about the Wikidata Query tool]
** [http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.de/2013/09/some-answers-about-heady-stuff-of.html Gerard did an interview with Emw] about the heady stuff of Wikidata
* Other Noteworthy Stuff
** 30 percent of all items are categorized in 6 large groups (main type (GND) (P107)). Most are items about geographic features (1.7 million items), some of these already have coordinates (0.5 million). Items about persons are fairly frequent too (1.3 million), many already with gender (0.9 million), a few with DOB (0.05 million) or DOD (0.04 million). Other groups include: creative works (305,000), terms, organizations, and events.
** The first 2 [[d:Wikidata:Oversight|Wikidata oversighters]] are elected, [[d:User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]] and [[d:User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754]]. Please contact the email at the above page, and do not post requests onwiki. Two more candidates are running: [[d:Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Oversight/Stryn 2|Stryn]] and [[d:Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Oversight/Sven Manguard 2|Sven Manguard]].
** [[d:Wikidata:Tools#Label Collector|Neat new gadget]] to semi-automatically import labels, aliases and descriptions based on Wikipedia article introductions
** [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata-tech/2013-September/000316.html New search backend on testwikidata needs testing]
** Commons is still scheduled to get interwiki links via Wikidata on Monday and can also be tested on test.wikidata.org
* Did you know?
** Newest properties: [[:d:Property:P916|GSRR rating]], [[:d:Property:P915|filming location]], [[:d:Property:P914|USK rating]], [[:d:Property:P913|notation]], [[:d:Property:P912|facility]], [[:d:Property:P911|South African municipality code]], [[:d:Property:P910|topic's main category]], [[:d:Property:P909|Nova Scotia Register of Historic Places identifier]], [[:d:Property:P908|PEGI rating]], [[:d:Property:P907|AMG Game ID]], [[:d:Property:P906|Libris]], [[:d:Property:P905|PORT identifier]]
* Development
** Wikimedia Deutschland is looking for a [http://wikimedia.de/wiki/Software_Developer_(f/m)_focus_on_Frontend_Development_with_JavaScript software developer with a focus on frontend development with Java Script] to work on Wikidata among other things. Apply!
** [[d:Wikidata:Paper cuts|Paper Cut]]: Display the ID of an item or property page next to the label ([[bugzilla:53462]])
** [[d:Wikidata:Paper cuts|Paper Cut]]: Fix value field not loading for some properties ([[bugzilla:53157]])
** [[d:Wikidata:Paper cuts|Paper Cut]]: Work on supporting non-earth globes in the UI ([[bugzilla:54097]])
** Worked on quantity data type implementation in backend and frontend
** [https://github.com/JeroenDeDauw/WikidataBuilder Work on a build and release tool for the Wikidata software]
** More work on sorting of references and qualifiers
** Work on database schema modification functionality to be used by the query store
** Prepare deployment for Wikimedia Commons (including improving script for populating sites table, adding support for Wikimedia Commons)
** Work on making entity data available in the Mobile Wikibase skin
** new Cirrus Search (Elastic Search) backend enabled on test.wikidata.org
** Finished up cucumber tests for sitelinks
** Hotfixes for coordinates autosummaries
** Worked on simplifying process of defining wb.fetchedEntities
** Finished working on wbeditentity
** Worked on MySQL and SQLite table definition readers
* Open Tasks for You
** [[d:Wikidata:Database_reports/Constraint_violations/Summary|Help fix formatting and value issues]] for a property.
** [[d:Wikidata:Requests for comment|Respond to a "Request for Comment"]].
** Hack on one of [https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?keywords=need-volunteer%2C%20&keywords_type=allwords&emailcc1=1&resolution=---&emailtype1=exact&emailassigned_to1=1&query_format=advanced&email1=wikidata-bugs%40lists.wikimedia.org&list_id=162515 these].
</div>
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[m:Wikidata/Status updates/2013 09 20|Read the full report]]''' &middot; [[m:Global message delivery/Targets/Wikidata|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[m:Global message delivery|Global message delivery]] 22:03, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
</div>
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0589 -->

== Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! ==

{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse/Questions|Scrutiny on new articles while bad, older articles are nurtured|ts=[[User:Howicus|Howicus]] [[User talk:Howicus|(Did I mess up?)]] 00:32, 21 September 2013 (UTC)}}

==Mountains Appalachian Trail CfD==
Thanks for informing me about this. --[[User:ColonelHenry|ColonelHenry]] ([[User talk:ColonelHenry|talk]]) 21:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
: No problem, [[User:ColonelHenry|ColonelHenry]]. I can't believe it's already being revived and discussed after it was closed last week. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 22:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

== Header gaps ==

Hiyo. This is barely worth mentioning, but (afaik) there is no consensus on whether talkpage headers or article headers should have a gap underneath them. It's good to be consistent within each page, but otherwise it's best not to add or remove the gaps (as you did [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Content_forking&curid=3052635&diff=573924281&oldid=566416248 here]). Some people prefer them for visual clarity when scanning the wikitext. Also, if we click the "New section" button, (as I've done for this message) then the software will automatically produce a header with a blankline underneath it.  That's all, and again, no big deal. :) –[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] ([[User talk:Quiddity|talk]]) 21:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
: Thanks for letting me know about your preference, [[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]]. But if there is no consensus then I guess either way is correct, no? [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 22:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
::It's not "my preference" at all. It's a lack of consensus in either direction. But the more important point is that the software adds these gaps in automatically, so they're endorsed at a certain software level. I would recommend that you not remove existing gaps, especially when an entire page uses them. HTH. –[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] ([[User talk:Quiddity|talk]]) 22:32, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
::: Okay, [[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]], thanks for letting me know. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 10:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

== Thank you ==
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Sachertorte DSC03027.JPG  |100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Sweet Treat Award'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your continuing contributions at [[WP:BLPN]], Cheers! <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]] • [[User_ talk:Keithbob|<span style="color:#075;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 20:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
|}
: Thanks, [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]], I don't get many of these rewards. Maybe because I am often contrary! So, thank you very much. ;-) [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 21:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
::Your work is good, and appreciated, keep going! --<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]] • [[User_ talk:Keithbob|<span style="color:#075;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 21:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

==Welcome!==
Hello, Newjerseyliz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Newjerseyliz|your contributions]]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
*[[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction to Wikipedia]]
*[[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]]
*[[Help:Editing|How to edit a page]] and [[Wikipedia:Article development|How to develop articles]]
*[[Wikipedia:Your first article|How to create your first article]] 
*[[Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style|Simplified Manual of Style]]
Please remember to [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign]] your messages on [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]]s by typing four [[tilde]]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{help me}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome -->

<div style="border-style: solid; border-color: blue; background-color: Red; border-width: 1px; text-align: left; padding: 8px 8px 0;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Gargoyle 1.JPG|200px|left|Come here and I'll point the spout at YOU!]]
<p style="font-size: 200%; color: #fff; margin: 0.2em 0 0;">Don't call names, {{User:RexxS/Shakespearean insults|1=you}}!</p>
<p style="font-size: 120%; color: Gold; margin: 0;">You have been noticed using opprobrious epithets. It's payback time from the [[User:RexxS/Shakespearean insults|{{white|Shakespeare Insult Generator}}]]! To activate the Insultspout and receive fresh insults, click [{{fullurl:{{{{{|safesubst:}}}FULLPAGENAME}}|action=purge}} {{white|here}}]. Note that all insults generated by the Spout are guaranteed literary and cultured, unlike the nasty things ''you'' said, {{User:RexxS/Moah Shakespearean insults|1=you}}. </p><!--All credit to Shakespeare; to http://writers-write-creative-blog.posterous.com/shakespearean-insults for collecting the words and for the idea of combining them at random; and to [[User:RexxS]] for creating the automatic insult generator {{User:RexxS/Shakespearean insults}}.--><!--User:Darwinbish/insultspout-->
{{clear}}
</div>
Hmm never seen this template before, but in my opinion its abusive and a personal attack and its should be discontinued.--<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]] • [[User_ talk:Keithbob|<span style="color:#075;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 16:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
: I thought it was funny, [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]], and placed it on my Talk Page myself. The "epiphets" are so ludicrous and silly, I can't believe anyone would take them personally. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 17:11, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
::OK, I thought it was placed here by someone else. Glad you find it fun. Peace! --<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]] • [[User_ talk:Keithbob|<span style="color:#075;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 19:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Original Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I don't know which one to give you, but thanks for trying to help L'Odm :) ~[[User:Charmlet|<span style="color:maroon;">Charmlet</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Charmlet|<span style="color:black;">-talk-</span>]]</sup> 01:32, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
|}
Wow, [[User:Charmlet|<span style="color:maroon;">Charmlet</span>]], two "rewards" back-to-back! Thank you for noticing. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 01:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

== Creating categories ==
Hi Liz

When you create categories, please can you check that they have a proper set of parent categories?

I just reviewed some recent categories which you created, and found that they all lacked at least one parent:

*{{lc|LGBT scientists from India}} was parented only under [[:Category:LGBT scientists by nationality]]. However, this category is an intersection of three attributes: Nationality (Indian), Occupation (scientists), and LGBT.  There parent categories should locate it within the relevant category trees, so I added [[:Category:Indian scientists]] and [[:Category:LGBT people from India]].
*{{lc|LGBT scientists from Hungary}} had the same problems as India
*{{lc|17th-century Japanese actors}} is an intersection of 3 attributes: era (17th c), nationality (Japanaese), and occupation (actors). It needs to be parented under categories which cover all those attributes, either individually or in pairs. You had categorised it under [[:Category:17th-century actors]] and {{cl|Japanese actors}}, both which were valid and correct; but that left it isolated from {{cl|17th century in Japan}}. So I added {{cl|17th-century Japanese people}}.
*{{lc|17th-century Spanish actors}} had the same prob as the Japanese ones
*{{lc|Bangladeshi producers}} is an intersection of 2 attributes: nationality (Bangladeshi), and occupation (producers). It needs to be parented under both those attributes, but you placed it only under {{cl|Bangladeshi people by occupation}}, leaving it isolated from other producers. So I added  {{cl|Producers by nationality}}.
*{{lc|Bangladeshi male voice actors}} is an intersection of 3 attributes: gender (male), nationality (Bangladeshi), and occupation (voice actors). You has categorised it under {{cl|Bangladeshi male actors}} and {{cl|Bangladeshi voice actors}}, leaving it isolated from other male voice actors. So I added {{cl|Male voice actors}}.

[[WP:CAT#Category_tree_organization]] explains some of this.

Hope this helps. --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#663200;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 12:44, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
: Thanks for the advice, [[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#663200;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]]. I recognize your substantial experience and while at times we might disagree on CfD decisions, I hope to always work within the guidelines of what is appropriate with categorization at Wikipedia.
: I appreciate the corrections...it will help me learn to do a better job in the future! [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 13:11, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

==Explaining==
I [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol|patrolled]] your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/patrolled pages|okay]]: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. <!-- Template:Whydidyoudothat --> [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 13:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

== Commons ==

I am requesting a rename on Commons. My current Commons name is Newjerseyliz. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 16:16, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

== about blocks and trolls and such ==
Hi Liz. I notice you seem to have an interest in the fate of blocked or banned users. I watch a lot of pages relating to these processes as I am a fairly active admin, and I'm sure you have noticed that I participate in many discussions of these areas myself. 

I have been  active on WP for about six years now, have been an administrator for just over four years and an oversighter for about three years. I'm telling you this not to brag or pull rank, but to indicate that  I have seen a ''lot'' of what Wikipedia has to offer. People who work on developing content in areas not rife with controversy get the best of it, and (contrary to what many believe) us janitors and behind-the-scenes folks get the worst. I've dealt with many trolls and vandals in my time, from school kids who insert obscenities into articles all the way up to folks with their own entry at [[WP:LTA]], and I,can tell you this with a high degree of confidence: LODM is not a new user at all. This is someone who has edited here before, probably under multiple past identities and who created this account knowing all along it would end up like this.  They claim they are fighting censorship but they are really just trying to upset people. In other words, [[Troll (internet)|trolling]]. 

Why, you may ask, would someone do that? I can't say I really know.  Most people have a hard time understating such behavior, and as we are directed to assume good faith they assume such a person is just misunderstood or bad at communicating, or something like that. In many cases they are right, but not in this case. This is a user who, from practically their first edit and with virtually every edit they have made since, is deliberately trying to cause problems, not solve them. I imagine a research psychiatrist could write several books on these people if they cared to. What is it that makes them want to come to a website that exists to share free knowledge with the world and try to turn it into a circus? If we understood that we might have more effective ways of dealing with it than blocking, but we don't and blocking is pretty much all we have. 

If I had to guess I would say the reason this block has not been appealed yet is that LODM is already operating another account. Either that or they had their fun here and moved on to some other website. I think if you thoroughly examine their contributions, as I did when evaluating this situation yesterday, a picture will emerge of a user who is more concerned with posting pictures of genitalia in as many places as possible and discussing the various ways a person might stick their tongue up another persons posterior than in building an encyclopedia. I am strongly opposed to censorship myself, but what LODM was doing was not fighting censorship, it was premeditated disruption for purposes only they understand. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 23:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

: First, [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]], I appreciate you coming to my Talk Page and offering a thoughtful, considered reply. The response to comments like this that I make is typically dismissive, especially because I've only recently become an active Editor. So, thanks for that.

: Second, LODM never hid the fact that she/he used to edit under IPs. So did I, up until when I created this new account in July. So, I had no illusions that she/he was a brand new user.

: Third, I don't know if you saw my comments on AN/I but I was no fan of LODM. She/He could be downright stubborn, bull-headed and irritating. I don't think we ever had an exchange where we agreed on anything. We were not friends.

: What I objected to was the way these "community blocks" occur on AN and AN/I, these pile-ons that turn what was a simple request for an uninvolved Editor to have a word with LODM into a full-fledged, indefinite block. It is maddening to see some users with what seems like true harassment be ignored while a simple post asking for help turns into indefinite blocks for either the person accused or the accuser (or both). [[User:Charmlet|Charmlet]] didn't come to AN/I in order to drive L'Origine off of Wikipedia, she/he came with a simple request and then page stalkers saw L'Origine as an odd-ball and, boom!, an indefinite block. 

: Not a one week block, not a one month block, not a 3 month block. An indefinite block. And a block made by ''your'' judgment of what "the community" wanted (when we are really talking about a dozen opinionated Editors, right?), a block made by community consensus which doesn't seem to have an obvious way to appeal (how do you address a community to be unblocked?). You get a handful of Editors to show up at AN/I and yell, "Off with her/his head!" and you can get just about anyone off Wikipedia.

: I have no doubt that you are an experienced Admin and I hope that you do act with good intentions (AGF and all). But, I just want to let you know that, sometimes, the politely named "community consensus" looks, to a newcomer, to be capricious and random, with a lot of people who visit the noticeboard just to vote people off the island, so to speak. 

: It makes me understand why people have sock accounts after a block rather than grovel to be let back into the editing circle. After one has been banished, who is in a mood to say "I'm sorry, please forgive me?" So, what started out as a simple request to help with a confused Editor turns into an indefinite block and, probably, future accusations of socking. Wouldn't it have been less painful to simply address the problem that Charmlet had come to AN/I about?

: Now, you might be right, LODM could be a troll. Maybe you have keen and sophisticated "troll-dar" that comes from years of being an Admin. But suppose she/he ''wasn't''...well, that's another Editor who might have improved with help who got bounced off the website. I guess we differ on whether there was a justified consensus to take this action. And, in these cases, your opinion is more important than an ordinary Editor. That's just the way it is. But that doesn't mean I can't raise an objection when I think the process is unfair.

: Again, thanks for coming here and explaining your action as an Admin. I do appreciate it, despite my disagreement with the action you took. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 00:23, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
::FWIW, an indefinite block is not ''necessarily'' a permanent block, although, admittedly, in many or most cases it winds up being such. [[User:Bus stop]] was blocked indefinitely [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Block/Bus_stop here] (I hope you can see it) in 2007, but is active again today. And, in one recent case regarding [[Messianic Judaism]], regarding a minor edit in violation to a topic ban to, I think, a chart on the page, someone was blocked "indefinitely" until such time as he indicated he had been wrong to violate a topic ban he had been placed under, and then when he apologized the block was lifted. Indefinite blocks are, from what I've gathered, rather regularly appealed to ArbCom and others, and in at least quite a few cases, get lifted. Particularly if the editor involved is free to edit his user talk page, I don't know if that is the case here. Just FYI. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 21:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
::: [[User:John Carter|John ]], I saw this discussion continuing on [[User_Talk:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox' Talk Page]] where I was informed that there actually isn't something called a "community block" that is different from a regular Admin block. For example, Bonkers the Clown was indefinitely blocked, via AN/I, through the same process and on the same day as L'Origine and, boom!, today, he is unblocked. So, it's a) not necessarily forever and b) not impossible to overturn if the individual demonstrates that they won't continue their disruptive behavior. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 22:07, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Pardon my intrusion into this dialogue. If you guys really care about the fate of blocked/banned users, could you two take an independent look into the {{u|BruceGrubb}} case? From my perspective as a completely uninvolved editor, I still have a bad taste in my mouth about this sordid affair a year and a half later. Imho, this was a classic case of [[WP:POV railroad]]. [[User:Ignocrates|Ignocrates]] ([[User talk:Ignocrates|talk]]) 01:07, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

: Hi, [[User:Ignocrates|Ignocrates]]. Considering my lack of success persuading Admins '''not''' to block Editors, I think any action I would take would backfire. Regards, [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 02:08, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
::I understand. I just wish someone would lance this boil. Compared to my little problems, the controversy surrounding the [[Christ Myth Theory]] is ugly beyond belief. Cheers. [[User:Ignocrates|Ignocrates]] ([[User talk:Ignocrates|talk]]) 03:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
::: Let me guess, [[User:Ignocrates|Ignocrates]]...it pits those who believe Jesus Christ is a myth against those who believe he is a real, historical figure? I would ''not'' like to mediate that dispute. It's remarkable how unChristian some people become when their religious or atheist views are challenged. Lots and lots of heat generated and blood drawn, but nothing resolved. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 21:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

== ''The Signpost'': 25 September 2013 ==

<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-09-23}}
</div><!--Volume 9, Issue 38-->
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
* '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]'''
* [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]]
* [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 05:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0625 -->

== Funny you should say that... ==
I've just had a little word about needing references if he/she is going to launch it out of user space, and about FAKEARTICLE if it isn't launched. (I've also suggested deciding on the subject's gender...) [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 21:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
: Well, [[User:Peridon|Peridon]], when I went to look at the page you were talking about, I just assumed it was an article and put a <nowiki>{{refimprove}}</nowiki> tag on it. Usually people put articles they are working on in their Sandbox so I'm not sure what is up here. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 21:58, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
::Self promo, I think. I've already deleted an earlier version. He/she's getting a chance to do something with it - but I'm watching like a s****-hawk. That's how I knew you'd been there - and that someone had changed a cat from actor to actress (I've now removed all but one of the cats - shouldn't be there in userspace, but I'd missed that before). If nothing in the way of refs appear, and there's no sign of launching, I'll MfD it as FAKEARTICLE. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 22:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
::: I try to remove content categories from User Pages when I come across them but not when the Editor is working on an article and the categories relate to the subject in their Sandbox. Then, I think deleting them would come across as hostile and, for all I know, the article will be moved to Wikipedia space and then the categories would be valid. But mostly, I find content categories on User Pages of either new or inactive Editors so they are justified.<br>
::: Have a pleasant weekend! ;-) [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 22:28, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

== Wikidata weekly summary #77 ==

<div class="plainlinks mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr">
[[File:Wikidata-logo-en.svg|150px|right]]
<div style="margin-top:10px; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* [[d:Wikidata:Events|Events]]/[[d:Wikidata:Press coverage|Press/Blogs]]
** upcoming: UK Wikidata Training
** [[:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-09-18/Technology report|What can Wikidata, the collaboratively edited knowledge base, do for Wikipedia?]]
** [http://hangingtogether.org/?p=3331 “Allow me to reintroduce myself,” say those in Wikidata and VIAF]
** [http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.de/2013/09/importing-data-from-polish-wikipedia.html Importing data from the Polish Wikipedia]
* Other Noteworthy Stuff
** Denny's last day on the development team was today. He has a few closing remarks in [http://blog.wikimedia.de/2013/09/27/data-for-the-people/ this blog post].
** [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata-l/2013-September/002892.html Wikimedia Commons now gets language links via Wikidata]
** [[d:Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Oversight/Stryn 2|Stryn's request for oversight flag]]
** [[m:Grants:IEG/Understanding Wikidata|Individual Engagement Grants Proposal: Understanding Wikidata]]
** [http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-terminator/?list&lang=en&mode=t1000 Terminator now also has most linked-to items with no label in language X]
** [[d:Wikidata:Wikiquote|Draft for Wikidata support of Wikiquote]]
** [http://wikimedia.de/wiki/Software_Developer_(f/m)_focus_on_Frontend_Development_with_JavaScript Open position for a JavaScript developer to work on Wikidata] - please spread the word
* Did you know?
** Newest properties: [[:d:Property:P939|KSH code]], [[:d:Property:P938|FishBase species identifier]], [[:d:Property:P937|work location]], [[:d:Property:P935|Commons gallery]], [[:d:Property:P933|heritagefoundation.ca ID]], [[:d:Property:P932|PMCID]], [[:d:Property:P931|city served]], [[:d:Property:P930|type of electrification]], [[:d:Property:P929|color space]], [[:d:Property:P928|activating neurotransmitter]], [[:d:Property:P927|anatomical location]], [[:d:Property:P926|postsynaptic connection]], [[:d:Property:P925|presynaptic connection]], [[:d:Property:P924|possible treatments]], [[:d:Property:P923|possible examinations]], [[:d:Property:P922|magnetic ordering]], [[:d:Property:P921|main topic of creative work]], [[:d:Property:P920|Spanish subject headings for public libraries]], [[:d:Property:P919|SOC Occupation Code]], [[:d:Property:P918|NOC Occupation Code]], [[:d:Property:P917|GRAU index]]
* Development
** Said Good Bye to Denny - *sob*
** Improved layout for commons sitelink table
** More work on sorting
** Worked on statements UI tests
** Fixed failing QUnit tests
** Deployed new code and updated sites for Commons deployment
** Fixed a number of small bugs
** Code review for Google Summer of Code student projects
** Work to automate creating deployment branches and builds of Wikibase with its dependencies
* Open Tasks for You
** [[d:Wikidata:Database_reports/Constraint_violations/Summary|Help fix formatting and value issues]] for a property.
** Build a bot for one of the [[Wikidata:Bot_requests|"bot requests"]]. 
** [[d:Wikidata:Requests for comment|Respond to a "Request for Comment"]].
** Hack on one of [https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?keywords=need-volunteer%2C%20&keywords_type=allwords&emailcc1=1&resolution=---&emailtype1=exact&emailassigned_to1=1&query_format=advanced&email1=wikidata-bugs%40lists.wikimedia.org&list_id=162515 these].
</div>
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[m:Wikidata/Status updates/2013 09 20|Read the full report]]''' &middot; [[m:Global message delivery/Targets/Wikidata|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[m:Global message delivery|Global message delivery]] 23:20, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
</div>
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0593 -->

== Category:Songs written by Jason Blume ==
Richhoncho, who created the category, voted "delete" in the CFD, so I tagged the category for G7. That's what happened there. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 14:31, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
: Okay, <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup>, thanks for letting me know. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 18:17, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

== 666! ==

As one of a highly select international group, you are hereby invited to join me in celebrating [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APdfpdf&diff=575124111&oldid=574992983 my 666!] (Let the games begin!) [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 11:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
: Thanks for the invitation, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]]! [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 14:23, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

== October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive ==



<div style="border: 2px solid #484898; background: #FFF; background-color:#98FB98; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 90%">
<div style="border-bottom: 2px dotted #484898">'''WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive'''</div>
[[Image:AFC-Logo.svg|75px|right]]
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|WikiProject AFC]] is holding a '''one month long''' Backlog Elimination Drive!<br />
The goal of this drive is to '''eliminate''' the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.<br />
There is a backlog of over {{Rounddown|{{formatnum:{{PAGESINCATEGORY:Pending AfC submissions}}|R}}|-2}} articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/October 2013 Backlog Elimination Drive|drive's page]] and help out!

A new version of our [[WP:AFCH|AfC helper script]] is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Changelog|changelog]]. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --[[User:Mdann52|<span style="color:Green;">'''Mdann'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdann52|<span style="color:Red;">'''52'''</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Mdann52|<span style="color:Maroon;">''talk to me!''</span>]]</small></div>
<small>This newsletter was delivered on behalf of [[WP:WPAFC|WPAFC]] by [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 15:36, 30 September 2013 (UTC)</small>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0628 -->
==Not yet==
I haven't begun the draft, but that is the raw selection. <b>[[User:Serendipodous|<span style="color:#0000bb;">Serendi</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serendipodous|<sup style="color:#bb0000;">pod</sup>]][[User talk: Serendipodous|<span style="color:#0000bb;">ous</span>]]</b> 17:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
: Thanks, <b>[[User:Serendipodous|<span style="color:#0000bb;">Serendi</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serendipodous|<sup style="color:#bb0000;">pod</sup>]][[User talk: Serendipodous|<span style="color:#0000bb;">ous</span>]]</b>! Don't worry, I won't breathe a word. ;-) [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 17:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

== Wikimedia NYC Meetup! Saturday October 5 ==

{| style="background-color: #E0FFFF; border: 1px solid #0000FF;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Jefferson market crop.jpg|left|100px|alt=Jefferson Market Public Library]]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Please join the '''[[Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC|Wikimedia NYC Meetup]]''' on  October 5, 2013! <BR>Everyone gather at '''Jefferson Market Library''' to further Wikipedia's '''local outreach'''<BR>for '''education''', '''museums''', '''libraries''' and planning '''WikiConference USA'''.<BR>--[[User:Pharos|Pharos]] ([[User talk:Pharos|talk]]) 21:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
|}
<!-- EdwardsBot 0630 -->

== FYI ==
was just perusing an/i (yeah, i'm that bored) and noticed you used the term "Indian-Canadian".  Solely in the assumed spirit of everyone 'round here wanting to be better informed, it's "Indo-Canadian".  (For the record i am the latter but not the former).  Peice Owt.
[[User:Primergrey|Primergrey]] ([[User talk:Primergrey|talk]]) 20:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
: Sorry, [[User:Primergrey|Primergrey]], but my choice of Canada was rather random. I didn't want to use "Indian-American" and I'm not sure what you call a person who is Indian and British. So, Canada was their third country that came to mind. <br>
: Thanks for the correction though, now I know better. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 21:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

== WikiCup 2013 September newsletter ==

In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion. {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4|Cwmhiraeth}} currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice. {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4|Sasata}}, {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4|Hawkeye7}}—who has never participated in the competition before—and {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4|Casliber}} follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include [[Phoenix (constellation)]] (FA by Casliber), [[Ernest Lawrence]] (GA by Hawkeye7), [[Pinniped]], and [[red fox]] (both GAs by Sasata).

The did you know (DYK) [[Wikipedia:DYK#Eligibility criteria|eligibility criteria]] have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, '''[[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring#Next year's competition- brainstorm|thoughts are welcome]]''' on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to '''[[Wikipedia:WikiCup/2014 signups|sign up for the 2014 WikiCup]]'''.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]]. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]] • [[Special:Emailuser/J Milburn|email]]) and [[User:The ed17|The ed17]] ([[User talk:The ed17|talk]] • [[Special:Emailuser/The ed17|email]]) 22:36, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0631 -->

== Ebionites 3 Evidence ==

Hi Liz, I see you decided to contribute to the Evidence page after all. I'm glad you weighed in with a view of what happened on your talk page, and I'm also glad you said something about what John Carter did to Ret.Prof.

One of the things you noted in Evidence is how few actual edits to articles John Carter has made. I have looked into this in detail and plan to discuss it in the Workshop. If a contribution to article content is defined as a least one complete sentence supported by at least one reliably sourced reference, here is John Carter's last contribution to sourced article content: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ebionites&action=historysubmit&diff=385199384&oldid=385198599 diff]. On September 16, 2010, he created the Modern Ebionites section of the [[Ebionites]] article. Other than about a half-dozen pages of bibliographies (lists of references) created on or around Oct. 29, 2010 that is all. After Oct. 2010 there is not even a single sentence added to article pages in 3 years. This is relevant to Smeat75's point about John Carter's lack of understanding of reliable sources. How can someone who edits so little have so much to say on article talk pages about what everyone else should be doing regarding the proper use of sources? It will be interesting to see what other editors have to say about this in the Workshop. [[User:Ignocrates|Ignocrates]] ([[User talk:Ignocrates|talk]]) 22:43, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
: Well, [[User:Ignocrates|Ignocrates]], I won't pass judgment on your or his level of knowledge about the subject. My observation was purely from hanging out on the article Talk Pages and noting that John seemed to want the power of veto but he never followed up on your repeated requests that he contribute to the article by supplying other references. This seemed unusual because I do know that John edits other articles. My guess, purely speculative, is that he didn't want the kind of scrutiny he leveled at you to be laid on his contributions. I know that usually people who are judgmental are hardest on themselves. <br>
: This is simply my own observation, [[User:Ignocrates|Ignocrates]], but you have the advantage because, in general, you have remained civil and, as this dispute has continued, you stopped personalizing it and made it about the content. I urge you to continue taking the high road throughout the arbitration process. Refrain from reacting to provocative comments and just dispassionately present the facts as you see them. Since I know John has my Talk Page on his watchlist, I'd give him the same advice. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 23:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

:Another interesting point related to the above is that John Carter claimed on the [[Gospel of the Ebionites]] talk page that he recused himself from editing because of accusations of bias. When I called him out on this, he either could not or refused to produce any evidence of these accusations. However, in the process of digging for the diff I showed you above, I found these two: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AChristianity_noticeboard&diff=484092559&oldid=483837039 diff], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Alternative_Views&diff=prev&oldid=484098231 diff]. In these posts to project talk pages, John Carter claims he was accused of falsifying sources, not bias. I would like to know more specifics about this incident, as it may be relevant to the Workshop. [[User:Ignocrates|Ignocrates]] ([[User talk:Ignocrates|talk]]) 22:51, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
:: Again, my advice above. In my view, less is more, you have strong points, you don't need to pile it on. This hearing is not an attempt to seek some kind of revenge but to clarify a dispute. You don't need to detail every misstep, just present your strongest evidence and answer any additional questions the Abitrators pose to you. My 2 cents. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 23:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
:::Well said, thanks. [[User:Ignocrates|Ignocrates]] ([[User talk:Ignocrates|talk]]) 01:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

== Your mention of “sports“ at WP:AN ==
Hello, Liz! I just wanted to remark that the statistics collected on those user pages that are up for deletion were not about sports AFAICT: rather, it seems, a form of [[Railfan#Trainspotting|trainspotting]] for circulating banknotes, a hobby that’s unlikely to be the subject of extensive articles.—[[User:Odysseus1479|Odysseus]][[User talk:Odysseus1479|'''<span style="color:slateblue;">1</span><span style="color:darkviolet;">4</span><span style="color:purple;">7</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Odysseus1479|'''<span style="color:maroon;">9</span>''']] 01:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
: [[User:Odysseus1479|Odysseus]][[User talk:Odysseus1479|'''<span style="color:slateblue;">1</span><span style="color:darkviolet;">4</span><span style="color:purple;">7</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Odysseus1479|'''<span style="color:maroon;">9</span>''']], I'll have to think a little harder to figure out "AFAICT", not sure what that stands for. But the pages I looked at looked like sports teams' rosters and the outcome of conference matches. But I just spot-checked 6 or 7 pages on that long, long list. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 01:35, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
::Sorry: “As Far As I Can Tell”. I only looked at a couple of those pages myself–a case of the blind men & the elephant, I suppose.—[[User:Odysseus1479|Odysseus]][[User talk:Odysseus1479|'''<span style="color:slateblue;">1</span><span style="color:darkviolet;">4</span><span style="color:purple;">7</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Odysseus1479|'''<span style="color:maroon;">9</span>''']] 07:48, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

==Notice of External links noticeboard discussion==
Hello, Liz. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion at [[Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard]] is taking place regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ELN-notice--> Thank you.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:MorrowStravis|MorrowStravis]] ([[User talk:MorrowStravis|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MorrowStravis|contribs]]) 22:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Whisperback ==

{{wb|Kudpung}} 23:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

== Whisperback ==

{{wb|Kudpung}} 00:11, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

== Errrrrrrrr. G'day! ==
I've replied. Cheers, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 15:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
: Thanks for letting me know, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]]! [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 15:55, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
::No worries.  As I've often said:  ''[[T'ain't What You Do (It's the Way That You Do It)]]'', and one of the reasons I enjoy communicating with you is because I like "the Way That You Do It". [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 16:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
:::a) "Talkback"  b) It's nearly 2am here - past time to "retire'. Cheers, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 16:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
:::: Goodnight, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]]! [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 16:18, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
''P.S. Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits&curid=19769155&diff=575597934&oldid=575454409 this], see the first sentence of [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits#List]]. (Or am I missing something?) Anyway - bedtime! [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 16:27, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
: Yes, you are right, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]], there they are. They aren't very prominent though. I've looked over this page a dozen times and never noticed those links. So, thanks for pointing them out to me. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 16:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
::Yes, I agree with what you say, because I had to expend some effort to find them, and I knew what I was looking for, and I knew they were there ... somewhere. [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 16:58, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
::: Go.to.bed, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]]! ;-) See you when the sun come up down under. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 17:11, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

== Whisperback ==

{{wb|Kudpung}} 08:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for October 4==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Hammonton, New Jersey]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Supernatural (TV series)]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Hammonton%2C_New_Jersey|check to confirm]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Hammonton%2C_New_Jersey|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 12:34, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

== Teenly ==
I've been crying after reading that talk page and her contributions both the articles and other pages. I find it difficult to believe that she was as young as is stated but even if she was three times that age, well, what she had to offer was amazing. Life just isn't fair sometimes. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 20:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
: I'm not sure how you came across my question about Teenly, [[User:Sitush|Sitush]], you must have that Departed Wikipedians page on your Watchlist. Yes, it's hard to believe that a 6 year old was actually editing on WP and communicating with others. But her User Talk Page doesn't read like a hoax. And, in my years on Twitter, I'm pretty familiar with accounts that pretend to be sick children. This doesn't sound like those.
: If you found her Page moving, read the note that mentioned her passing at [[User:Bwilkins#Special notes left for me]] ...I think any Editor would tear up after receiving a note like that on their Talk Page. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 21:32, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
::Yes, the Departed page is watchlisted from the time when Tito Dutta was improving it earlier this year. I agree that Teenly is not a hoax. She was clearly a very gifted child, and I've known a couple. I just find it very upsetting: what we've lost and what she gave. I don't usually get too bothered about deaths or about children but reading of and around this particular one hurts. It seems that I have a heart after all but it is preventing me from editing right now, so I'm going to sign off for a bit. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 21:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
::: Well, it's a surprise to me that WP brought a small child pleasure but with what she was dealing with, I'm glad it could provide a little distraction from her illness. Take care, [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 23:55, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

== ''The Signpost'': 02 October 2013 ==

<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-10-02}}
</div><!--Volume 9, Issue 39-->
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
* '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]'''
* [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]]
* [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 00:43, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0634 -->

== A cupcake for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Choco-Nut Bake with Meringue Top cropped.jpg|120px]]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I know I'm going to make you fat but just the same :-) I wanted to acknowledge your astute and succinct contributions to the Ebonites3 ArbCom evidence page. Its important to have uninvolved editors step in and give their perspective. OK.......... now eat your cupcake!! <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]] • [[User_ talk:Keithbob|<span style="color:#075;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 21:03, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
|}
Wow, thanks, [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]], it's appreciated. I wish I could remember how I ended up on the edge of this fierce dispute since I have no opinion about subject. I hesitated to get involved at ARBCOM because I'm more of a witness to a fight than an involved party (and this fight has lasted six years!). I've made a few comments on the Workshop page until I saw how many ideas were being put on the table and I think the Arbs need to sort this out themselves. 

But I appreciate you noticing! Have a great week! [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 22:34, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

==Talkback (Ks0stm)==
{{talkback|Ks0stm|Manning sanctions in Sexology?|ts=19:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)}}
[[User:Ks0stm|<span style="color:#009900;">'''Ks0stm'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Ks0stm|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Ks0stm|C]]•[[User:Ks0stm/Guestbook|G]]•[[User:Ks0stm/Email|E]])</sup> 19:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

{{Talkback|WWB Too|Hobby Lobby|ts = 23:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)}}

== Changes to Wael Hallaq ==
Dear Liz,

I submit the following for your consideration. First, as I explained recently to Flyer22 on her talk page:

1) the identification "non-Muslim Arab" in the opening sentence, though true, has the effect of stereotyping Wael Hallaq and his academic contributions. Although the fact that he is a non-Muslim and an Arab may be of interest to some readers, stating the fact at the outset gives it undue precedence; this wrong emphasis is a disservice to the living subject of the article and to the reader, and, as I have said, comes off as a an attempt to stereotype. Imagine, for example, if the article on Reza Aslan opened with "Reza Aslan is a non-Christian Persian," or the article on Muhammad Ali opened with "Muhammad Ali is a non-Christian African."
2) For the above reason, I chose to remove "non-Muslim Arab" (which, along with its citation, had been added by another editor), and to insert the term "non-Muslim" into the third sentence of the second paragraph. In this way, the fact may be known to those who, for whatever reason, deem it important, but not in such an essentializing and stereotyping manner. As for "Arab," so much should be evident through the combination of his name and birthplace; it need not be stated at the outset as a defining characteristic--the effect, again, is stereotyping.

Second, I continue to disagree that the phrase "is a prominent scholar" requires citation, and here is the argument I presented to Flyer 22 for the same:

3) As for my choice of the word "prominent" to replace "non-Muslim Arab," this is not POV requiring citation. The facts related in the article are eloquent testimony to Wael Hallaq's prominence in Islamic Studies: three decades in the academic field, two highly-sought-after and influential professorships, nine authored volumes, and some sixty other publications are evidence enough of prominence in an academic field. Prominence is not proven by citing a text which links the subject to the word "prominent;" rather, it is evidenced by the subject's many and influential accomplishments and publications. Scholars and students in the field of Islamic Legal Studies--my own area of study, authorship, and teaching--know the name Wael Hallaq very well.

Finally, I understand the concern you expressed as "Removing sourced material," as the opening "non-Muslim Arab" was indeed cited, and the citation removed when I removed the opening phrase. 

Seeking resolution to this persistent rolling back of my edits, I will do the following:
1) I will remove "non-Muslim Arab" for the stereotyping reasons outlined above
2) Despite my continuing disagreement, I will not replace it with anything (i.e., I will not insert "prominent" or any other descriptor)
3) I will retain the citation, and move it to the term "non-Muslim" which now occurs in the second paragraph, deemphasizing the fact so as to avoid stereotyping

Regards,
[[User:RaHHaal|RaHHaal]] ([[User talk:RaHHaal|talk]]) 17:41, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

: That sounds perfectly reasonable, [[User:RaHHaal|RaHHaal]]. Note that these guidelines about language like "well-known", "accomplished", "top-ranked", "most important", "the best", "spectacular", etc. are applied to all profiles and are actually a big problem on articles about entertainers (actors and singers). It's not a standard that is being unjustly applied to this article alone. It's a constant battle on Wikipedia against superlative language.
: As for [[ Wael Hallaq]]'s prominence, you don't have to find a reference that specifically uses that word. It can be any reference (from a reliable source) to his importance as a scholar that you can find. One source you could cite, for example, is any prominent award or honor he has received or if holds an endowed chair for his professorship. That would demonstrate his prominence.
: I think Wikipedia has a particularly high bar for academics...there are many scholars who I think should be listed on Wikipedia but there are Editors who evaluate academics and they can't have a ''regular'' record of teaching and publishing, they have demonstrate they are ''exceptional'' or notable outside of their academic discipline. Since most academics spend the their time on research and don't seek out media attention or publicity, this is a difficult standard to meet.
: I'm glad we could come to a compromise you can live with at the moment. Note that if these edits are challenged by others, we'll need to move this conversation to the article Talk Page. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 18:08, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

== Reference desk ==
Hi Liz, I am not sure if there are any admins or other well-meaning editors who 'police' the reference desk, sorry I can't really help here :( [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 17:40, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
: Well, [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]], you can help me if you'll indulge me in one more question: Have you seen disputes concerning the Reference Desks (regarding users, incidents or policies) posted to AN or AN/I in your tenure here at Wikipedia? I'm just wondering if that's where a discussion like this would happen. Thanks for your assistance! [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 18:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
::Yes, there have certainly been dispute about the RD posted at ANI - but if you're seeking more guidance then I'd try AN. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 18:20, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
::: Right now, it's just an observation, [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]]. But now I'll search the AN and AN/I archives and see if it is an issue that has come up before. Thanks again. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 18:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

== ''The Signpost'': 09 October 2013 ==

<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-10-09}}
</div><!--Volume 9, Issue 40-->
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
* '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]'''
* [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]]
* [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 13:07, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0639 -->

== Why don't you run for admin ==

Greetings Liz, I saw your comments at Jimbo's page and was wondering why you don't run for RFA. Your editing history seems to support that you would do well. [[Special:Contributions/71.126.152.253|71.126.152.253]] ([[User talk:71.126.152.253|talk]]) 01:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

: That's flattering, [[Special:Contributions/71.126.152.253|71.126.152.253]], thanks. But I have some strikes against me:
* Though my first Wikipedia account was registered in 2007, I was a sporadic Editor until July of this year. I doubt that I'd get credit for all of my edits under my other accounts (including my IP account) and there seems to be a 12 month minimum for consistent editing.
* I'm interested in the processes of how Wikipedia runs smoothly, assessing consensus, examining policies, voicing unpopular opinions that should be heard, dispute resolution. I don't see my forte as content creation and that's, pretty much, a basic requirement for all successful RfA. Lots of GAs, FAs and DYKs are often emphasized.
* They now require extended "tours of duty" (2 or 3 months) in a variety of areas (AfD, AfC, Vandalism, NPP, etc.) and I'd rather find something I'm good at and stick with that (along with regular Wikignome activities) then round out my resume just for the sake of an acceptable future RfA.
* Plus, I've looked at the editing stats of long-time Admins. Doing Admin grunt work, putting out fires, checking unblock requests, requests for help, and the like, seems to consume all of the time that Admins used to spend working on the encyclopedia. It's like being an engineer and getting promoted to be a manager and finding that instead of doing creative work, all of your time is spent filling out paperwork and attending meetings. Yes, you get these powerful tools, but it looks like much of Admin work is borderline unpleasant and they are constantly criticized, no matter what they do. Yeah, sign me right up! ;-)
So, for all of these reasons, I don't think I'd do very well in an RfA and I'm not sure that Admin work is the kind of work I wanted to spend hours doing. But, again, I do appreciate your encouragement! [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 02:06, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
:You are right that usually 12 months of consistent editing and some experience in deletion/vandalism/etc. is typically a must for an admin candidate. But there are actually a number of admins who spend a lot of time writing content, like Wehwalt, Casliber, Jimfbleak, etc., so if you do become an admin you can always keep that up. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 03:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
:: Good to know, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]]. Unless my circumstances change (that is, I can unpack my library!), I don't see myself creating a lot of serious content, which is really needed right now in the sociology area. The limitations of a small apartment and not having an office any longer, everything is boxed up, especially bulky reference books. But, luckily, there are always a lot of other necessary tasks that need to be done! [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 20:04, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

== Encyclopedia ==
Hi I was just wondering if contributing to the encyclopedia itself ever interested you? What sort of topics interest you? ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 09:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

: Well, [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]], 51.70% of my edits are to the Wikipedia article space so I do work on the encyclopedia itself. All sorts of topics interest me, I try to fix problems, especially regarding references, tables and categories, when I come across them...small improvements that help articles.
: But I imagine you aren't talking about merely edits but content creation itself. After seeing so many newly created articles quickly deleted, the idea of putting a lot work into writing which is then erased, well, that is completely unappealing to me. I also don't see a lot of value in creating a lot of random stub articles which, by and large, are never expanded by other Editors, just for the sake of article creation. They typically don't provide much information and are just placeholders.
: It's been interesting to me to see so many unreferenced, badly written, older articles that currently exist on Wikipedia and then see such a high bar set for newly created articles. I'm not saying that bad articles should be accepted, just that standards have changed a lot on Wikipedia regarding article creation and now a lot of articles that could improve over time are simply being deleted. 
: At least, that is my perception of what is occurring. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 12:51, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

:::Agreed, a massive cleanup job is needed on here and it's difficult to know where to start, and shoddy new articles which go under the radar are adding to the cleanup job and workload. I just didn't recognize your name which if you're a veteran here that strikes me as odd.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 14:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
:::: Well, I first registered in 2007 as [[User:Nwjerseyliz|Nwjerseyliz]] but I made most of my edits logged out, as an IP. My most recent IP account seems like it is static as it only contains my edits if you check Contributions. But all I did was fix typos that I saw or run-on sentences, I didn't know much about formatting or how Wikipedia was organized.
:::: I decided to become more active last summer and my first comments in the Wiki space reflect my confusion and frustration over where to find information on how Wiki operates and how to edit. Now that I know my way around, it seems obvious but back in July, I kept searching for topics with Wikipedia's search function, not knowing that I had to go to Advanced and check the "Wikipedia" box in order to find pages in the Wiki space. It was very frustrating and I'm glad the Editors who staff the [[WP:Teahouse|Teahouse]] are incredibly patient.
:::: My first serious edits, of course, stepped on toes. I wish Editors and Admins who post warnings on User Talk Pages would realize that casual Editors don't even know that policy and guideline pages ''exist''...they don't know there are these articles they should read first or where they are and they couldn't find them without a direct link. So, I was labeled as "disruptive" and some of my edits were reverted because I was learning by trial and error. This scolding led to me spending a lot of time reading Wiki articles and noticeboards, in order to better understand Wikipedia culture and what expectations were. This is why you just started to seeing my name around the past few months and also why I also often advise against imposing blocks on new Editors because I know how much I stumbled around, ignorant of what customs and practices I was violating. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 16:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
:::: P.S. [[User:Nwjerseyliz|Nwjerseyliz]] still exists and if I go to other Wiki sites it logs me in under that username and when I return to en.wiki, I'm still logged in as Nwjerseyliz. So, you'll still see some edits there.

::*Liz wrote: <small><i>But I imagine you aren't talking about merely edits but content creation itself. After seeing so many newly created articles quickly deleted, the idea of putting a lot work into writing which is then erased, well, that is completely unappealing to me. </i></small>

::::I know exactly how you feel.

:::Liz wrote: <small><i>I also don't see a lot of value in creating a lot of random stub articles which, by and large, are never expanded by other Editors, just for the sake of article creation. They typically don't provide much information and are just placeholders. </i></small>

::::Just to play devil’s advocate: Most, if not all, the articles I created were stubs, and while what you say above  (still) applies to some, others have received some nice contributions. See for example [[Wage Earner Protection Program Act]]

:::Liz wrote: <small><i>It's been interesting to me to see so many unreferenced, badly written, older articles that currently exist on Wikipedia and then see such a high bar set for newly created articles. I'm not saying that bad articles should be accepted, just that standards have changed a lot on Wikipedia regarding article creation and now a lot of articles that could improve over time are simply being deleted.</i></small>

::::How true, sigh… X[[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 15:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
::::: I was spending a lot of time in [[WP:CfD]] last month, [[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]], but it could get so adversarial, it was tiring. I mean, the easiest thing is to vote '''Delete''' because it takes no effort (just like posting '''Block!''' on AN/I). But if you want to '''Keep''', you have to find policies, guidelines or logical reasons to justify why content should exist. I also felt like I needed to notify everyone who might be effected by a Delete and found that the majority of Editors are not checking in daily and decisions in Deletions wrap up quickly (usually in a week or less). So, that effort didn't pay off with much response but I'm glad I did it.
::::: I'm still finding out where I fit in to the Wiki world, where I can help out the most but also get some satisfaction. 
::::: I didn't mean to knock stub authors, some that I've seen are closer to articles while others are pretty meager. I just became curious how some Editors could create 100s (or 1000s) of articles and when I looked into it, they were often just a sentence-long stubs about some obscure type of salamander or gnat that lists their scientific name and common name and a reference to some biological reference book. A decent article could take weeks or months to craft especially considering all of the other things going on in life. It's quite an investment of time and effort to track down all of the necessary references so the subject is going to have to be one I already know something about. I truly admire Editors that have the persistence to take a so-so article to GA and FA status. 
::::: But like the guidelines say, this isn't a race, Wikipedia grows as a cumulative effort and a new article can be added today, next month or next year and still be a worthwhile addition. Sorry for rambling a bit, I tend to get a little reflective in the morning when I'm drinking my coffee. Thanks for being a Talk Page Stalker! ;-) [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 16:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
::::::Butting in here, I wholeheartedly agree with you about how it can take a long time to find sources, particularly at present. That's probably the main reason I'm working on getting together the lists of encyclopedic articles, and also trying to add some of the older PD ones to commons. Particularly for a lot of older topics, like maybe a 19th century mayor of Berlin, some of those older sources might be among the best out there, considering the possibly greater temporary significance of the subject at the time those works came out, and more space devoted to them on that basis, and the fact that, in a lot of cases, except some involving homosexual outing, revelation of subsequent sometimes questionable sexual or other forms of behavior, etc., there won't be a lot of currently regarded information about them that won't be included in those old sources. Granted, a lot of that sort of material can also, not unreasonably, be called "boring", but it might still be significant enough for inclusion here to some degree. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 17:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
::::::: You have to be very careful with old reference materials, [[User:John Carter|John]]. They reflect what certain scholars believed at the time they were written, but our understanding about most fields, from physics to literature to anthropology, is not even the same as it was ten years ago. I'd say that even a reference text from 1993 is out-of-date, depending on the type of information it contains.
::::::: I've seen old Catholic Encyclopedias from the turn of the 20th century and reading them gave me a good idea about what a particular group of chosen Catholic theologians (but not laypeople) believed about the saints or the sacraments in 1907. But we not only know more 100+ years later but scholarship itself has changed. Methods of research have changed, there are more academic contributions from scholars in countries outside of Europe and North America and also, gasp!, women, too. While much of academic training itself has changed little over the past 150 years (unfortunately), the individuals who are doing the research have changed, immensely, the research questions that are being asked have evolved over time and so have the conclusions drawn from that research.
::::::: Older reference materials are valuable in that they can demonstrate how understanding of a concept or event has changed over time but they are, basically, a moment encapsulated in a time capsule. I'd argue that they should only be used as a reference if a Wiki article is discussing what people at a certain moment in time believed as these works do not reflect contemporary scholarship. That doesn't make them useless, just that their use has to be qualified and it should be noted that they are dated. [[User:Liz|<span style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Read!''</b>]] [[User talk:Liz|<b style="color:#006400;">''Talk!''</b>]]</sup> 18:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
::::::::On the matters you referred to, I actually more or less agree, which is why I mentioned the example of an older mayor of Berlin, although I suppose any older biographical article about minor figures who haven't gotten much subsequent attention might be similar. Regarding matters of religion, yeah, I have seen how in some cases like regarding Nag Hammadi, the Dead Sea Scrolls, Mani's early Christianity, and several other matters which have been significantly changed by recent discoveries would invalidate a lot of the older conclusions, but that number of topics, broad as it is, is probably still a non-majority of the total number of all the possible topics out there. Particularly starting in the era of when written sources became particularly common, say the end of the 19th century, and some works like the Chambers, Britannica, and a few other comparatively non-biased sources, the older articles on, for instance, countries which have since been merged, or conquered, or whatever, might still be among the better sources for those older topics. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 18:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)