View source for Module talk:Excerpt

{{Permanently protected}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Portals}}
}}
{{central|text=the talk pages for all the transclude excerpt templates redirect here {{small|(as of 15 May 2020 UTC)}}:
{{flatlist|
*{{tl|Excerpt}}
*{{tl|Transclude&nbsp;lead&nbsp;excerpt}}
*{{tl|Transclude&nbsp;random&nbsp;excerpt}}
*{{tl|Transclude&nbsp;selected&nbsp;excerpt}}
*{{tl|Transclude&nbsp;linked&nbsp;excerpt}}
*{{tl|Transclude&nbsp;list&nbsp;item&nbsp;excerpt}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo                = old(160d)
| archive             = Module talk:Excerpt/Archive %(counter)d
| counter             = 4
| maxarchivesize      = 150K
| archiveheader       = {{Aan}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft      = 5
}}

== Strange missing end tag for bold ==

To fix a missing end tag for bold in [[Portal:Companies]], which uses {{tlx|Transclude random excerpt}}, I edited [[Sony]], changing 
<pre>
{{Nihongo foot|'''Sony Group Corporation'''|ソニーグループ株式会社|Sonī Gurūpu Kabushiki gaisha|{{IPAc-en|ˈ|s|oʊ|n|i}}|group=lower-alpha|extra2={{respell|SOH|nee}}|lead=yes}} (formerly {{Nihongo foot|'''Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo [[Kabushiki gaisha|K.K.]]'''|東京通信工業株式会社|4=Tokyo Telecommunications Engineering Corporation|lead=yes|group=lower-alpha|Tōkyō Tsūshin Kōgyō Kabushiki gaisha}} and {{Nihongo foot|'''Sony Corporation'''|ソニー株式会社|lead=yes|group=lower-alpha|Sonī Kabushiki gaisha}})
</pre>
to
<pre>
{{Nihongo foot|'''Sony Group Corporation'''|ソニーグループ株式会社|Sonī Gurūpu Kabushiki gaisha|{{IPAc-en|ˈ|s|oʊ|n|i}}|group=lower-alpha|extra2={{respell|SOH|nee}}|lead=yes}} (formerly {{Nihongo foot|'''Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo''' <!-- for now, don't bold outside the wikilink, because that causes missing end tag for bold when this page is transcluded with {{Transclude random excerpt}}. -->[[Kabushiki gaisha|'''K.K.''']]|東京通信工業株式会社|4=Tokyo Telecommunications Engineering Corporation|lead=yes|group=lower-alpha|Tōkyō Tsūshin Kōgyō Kabushiki gaisha}} and {{Nihongo foot|'''Sony Corporation'''|ソニー株式会社|lead=yes|group=lower-alpha|Sonī Kabushiki gaisha}})
</pre>
It did not work to change the problematic snip to <code><nowiki>{{Nihongo foot|'''Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo''' '''[[Kabushiki gaisha|K.K.]]'''...}}</nowiki></code>; it excerpted the bold from just before the wikilink but not the bold from just after the wikilink. It would be good to figure out why the original markup caused a problem and fix it. —[[User:Anomalocaris|Anomalocaris]] ([[User talk:Anomalocaris|talk]]) 00:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

:The issue was to do with there being an unexpected pipe wikilink in {{tl|Nihongo foot}}, which would cause the cleanup during [[Module:Excerpt/portals#L-210--L-211|stripTemplates]] to accidentally leave an unclosed wikilink and template, which would later get trimmed down and cause everything after it to vanish, leading to the above linter error as well as all the text dissapearing. I've fixed this in [[Special:Diff/1266381727]]. [[User:Aidan9382|Aidan9382]] <sub>([[User talk:Aidan9382|talk]])</sub> 09:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
::[[User:Aidan9382|Aidan9382]]: Looks good. Thank you for fixing [[Module:Excerpt/portals]], and for reverting my 3 edits of [[Sony]]. —[[User:Anomalocaris|Anomalocaris]] ([[User talk:Anomalocaris|talk]]) 18:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

== Infobox images in dark mode ==

See: [[COVID-19_drug_development#Novel_viral_replication_inhibitors]]

Ideally "''Module:Excerpt''" should copy the CSS class from both [[Template:Infobox drug]] and [[Template:Chembox]].

Infobox drug is currently working nicely in dark mode. See examples at:

[[Template:Infobox drug/testcases7images#Dark mode test]]

Chembox still needs some work: [[Template:Chembox/testcases7images#Dark_mode_tests]]
[[File:Escitalopram.svg|class=skin-invert|thumb|skin-invert]]
[[File:Escitalopram.svg|class=skin-invert-image|thumb|center|skin-invert-image]]

Both infobox uses: ''skin-invert-image'' and ''skin-invert''.
As "''Module:Excerpt''" uses the images in a thumb, it should always opt for "''skin-invert-image''" instead of "''skin-invert''", the reasons can be shown in the examples above.

Images uses <code>background-color: var(--background-color-inverted,#f8f9fa);</code> by default, and they should not be applied when there is a ''skin-invert-image'' class or the ''bg-transparent'' class.

We could try to adopt a similar thing to "''Module:Excerpt''".

Thanks! — [[User:Arthurfragoso|Arthurfragoso]] ([[User talk:Arthurfragoso|talk]]) 15:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

:I did some changes in the sandbox: [[Module:Excerpt/testcases#Dark Mode|testcases]]
:* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Module:Excerpt/config/sandbox&diff=1272270317&oldid=1211037332 Module:Excerpt/config/sandbox]
:* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Module:Excerpt/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=1272280268 Module:Excerpt/sandbox]
:It fixes dark mode when "skin-invert" or "skin-invert-image" is applied in [[Template:Infobox drug]].
:I was going to apply to [[Template:Chembox]] too, but I saw the entire Infobox were being transcluded, (see the testcases) so it is probably not being used for Chembox, and I skipped worrying about it.
:But the problem I'm having is that there isn't an easy way to add the white background fallback. 
:The current available CSS for the fallback that could be used is the following:
:<syntaxhighlight lang='css'>
html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output > figure[typeof='mw:File/Thumb'] img,
html.skin-theme-clientpref-os section .mw-heading ~ div > figure[typeof='mw:File/Thumb'] img,
html.skin-theme-clientpref-os section > figure[typeof='mw:File/Thumb'] img,
html.skin-theme-clientpref-os dd > figure[typeof='mw:File/Thumb'] img,
html.skin-theme-clientpref-os p > figure[typeof='mw:File/Thumb'] img,
{
    background-color:#c8ccd1;
}
</syntaxhighlight>
:It would be possible to wrap the image around {{code|<p></p>}}, <code><nowiki><section></section></nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki><div class='mw-parser-output'></div></nowiki></code> to accomplish this, but it seems to be a bad idea.
:Ideally, those working in wikipedia/wikimedia CSS could just provide us another CSS class for fallback. (.dark_mode_safe)
:-- [[User:Arthurfragoso|Arthurfragoso]] ([[User talk:Arthurfragoso|talk]]) 00:02, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
::I applied the changes that allows to enable using skin-invert.
::It currently just lacks the white background option. -- [[User:Arthurfragoso|Arthurfragoso]] ([[User talk:Arthurfragoso|talk]]) 02:02, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Is it possible that these changes broke the display at {{tl|Totd-collapse}}? It should be showing a portion of [[Wikipedia:Tip of the day/January 28]]. It is also possible that /January 27 was fine and that /January 28 has always been broken. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 02:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
::::I don't think it was caused by these changes, but I'm verifying. -- [[User:Arthurfragoso|Arthurfragoso]] ([[User talk:Arthurfragoso|talk]]) 03:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
::::The problem was in the [[Template:Totd-collapse]], I fixed and explained over there. Cheers! :) [[User:Arthurfragoso|Arthurfragoso]] ([[User talk:Arthurfragoso|talk]]) 03:58, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

== Possible ToU attribution violation issue with copy/translation from articles with excerpts ==

I wanted to raise a possible issue involving violation of [[WP:COPYRIGHT|licensing requirements]] as described at [[WP:CWW]]  and at [[wmf:TOU#7b|WMF Terms of Use]], which require crediting the original authors of a copied or translated passage in the target article's edit summary (see [[WP:CWW]] and [[WP:TFOLWP]]). Proper attribution is still possible when Excerpt (or [[WP:SELTRANS|selective transclusion]]) is involved, but is a bit tricky and may need to be addressed at the appropriate venue. (That venue is mostly not here, but I wanted to raise the issue here first, while I think about where and how to raise it more generally; probably at [[WP:CWW]] and perhaps elsewhere.)

The problem is when an editor at Wikipedia article 'A' copies or translates material from article 'B', where the 'B' content in question is not actually in 'B's wikicode, but excerpted/transcluded from article 'C'. In this case, the authors to be credited are not the B-authors, but the C-authors. (Or both, if what was excerpted spanned content hosted at 'B' as well as content excerpted from 'C' to 'B' into the excerpt area).

A real world example is at [[French colonial law]] ('A'), in [[Special:Diff/1269798952|this edit]] of 13:12, 16 January 2025, which credits the authors of ''[[:fr:Droit colonial français]]'' ('B'). Our article talks about {{xt|Colonial trade under French colonial law}} and a trade regime {{xt|known as the "Exclusif."}} This can be found in the French article in section ''[[:fr:Droit colonial français#Régime de l'exclusif|§&nbsp;Régime de l'exclusif]]''. If you edit that section ({{lang|fr|modifier le code}}) you will see that it is an Excerpt ({{lang|fr|Extrait}}) of French article ''[[:fr:Principe de l'exclusif]]'' ('C'). It is this last article that should have been credited, but was not.

I don't think this situation is an existential threat to the {{tl|Excerpt}} template, but people here should be aware of it.  I suspect that after some discussion among transclusion folks and attribution/copyright folks, the end result will be additional documentation in a few places (including here) about how to properly attribute copied or translated content that involves transclusion of third-party content. (Fwiw: I ended up at that diff investigating a completely different issue; it turns out that both of the refs in that diff are LLM hallucinations citing non-existent sources, which is curious, but  irrelevant for the attribution issue under discussion.) Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 01:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

:How is this different from all other types of transluded pages? — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 02:18, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
:: Not sure I understand the question, starting with the meaning of "transcluded pages". If you meant:
::* How is copying from an article section that has an {{tl|excerpt}} in it different from copying from an article section that has [[WP:SELTRANS]] or some other transclusion method in it? 
:::: ➤ They are no different.
::* What's different about this case, compared to any typical use of Excerpt (or SELTRANS, or any transclusion method)? 
:::: ➤ Typical usage of excerpt does not require attribution because nothing was copied. For example, the following excerpt from [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]] does not require attribution on this page, because nothing from the Emerson page was copied here, and therefore there is no need for attribution, per the [[wmf:TOU#7b|ToU]]:
{{cot|bg=cornsilk|indent=6.4em|excerpt from Ralph Waldo Emerson}}
{{excerpt|Ralph Waldo Emerson|Early life, family, and education|paragraphs=1|hat=no|references=no}}
{{cob}}
::* How is copying from an article section that has an excerpt (or other transclusion method) in it, different from copying from an article section that does not include an excerpt? 
:::: ➤ They differ in what needs to be attributed. The second case is the typical one, a simple copy (or translation) of material from one Wikipedia article to another—attribution must be given per the ToU, and this case is the one that is the entire subject of [[WP:Copying within Wikipedia]]. The first case is different. When article 'A' copies a section from article 'B', and the 'B' section contains an excerpt from 'C', then it depends how they did it, from the wikicode, or the rendered page. If they copied from the wikicode of 'B', then they have to credit the authors of 'B', and that's all; the {{tl|Excerpt}} template targeting 'C' will get copied to 'A', but not the content, so no credit to 'C' authors id required. (Footnote: in some cases, no credit at all is needed, if the entire copy from 'B' consists of an {{tl|Excerpt}} statement, because if no creative content from 'B' is copied over, then nothing needs accreditation.) If they select/copy from the rendered page (essentially, from 'Print view') of 'B', then they have to attribute it to both the authors of 'B' (if any creative content included) and definitely to the authors of 'C'.
:: If you meant something entirely different, please enlighten. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 05:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

An example of possible attribution language for a case of this type, including specifying the roles of 'B' and 'C' can be seen in [[Special:Diff/1270130727|this edit]] at [[French colonial law]], and states:
: {{xt|Content in the previous edit of [[Special:Diff/1269798952|13:12, 16 January 2025]] by User:Example was translated from the French article [[:fr:Principe de l'Exclusif]] (as excerpted by [[:fr:Droit colonial français]]); see that article's history for attribution}}

I have concerns that this is too tricky or convoluted to expect the average volunteer to be willing or able to deal with, and yet, that doesn't absolve us of the ToU requirement to do so, so I really don't know what the best path forward is here. Maybe something could be added to the documentation of the template explaining it, as well as a mention at [[WP:CWW]], perhaps. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 23:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

== |paragraphs=1 is grabbing paragraph 2 instead of paragraph 1 ==

<syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext">{{Excerpt|List of executive orders in the first presidency of Donald Trump|paragraphs=1|hat=no}}</syntaxhighlight>

I would like to grab

{{tq|United States presidents issue executive orders (in addition to other executive actions) to help officers and agencies of the executive branch manage the operations within the federal government itself.}}

not

{{tq|Donald Trump signed a total of 220 executive orders during his first term, from January 2017 to January 2021. As of January 2025, 72 of them (33%) have been revoked, many by his successor, Joe Biden.}}

Is this a bug in the module? Can it be fixed? Thanks. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 00:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

:It seems excerpt has seen and focused on the {{tag|onlyinclude|open}} tag, causing it to center on the 2nd paragraph (which happens to be the onlyinclude content). I don't believe there's currently an option in the module to just ignore the tag. [[User:Aidan9382|Aidan9382]] <sub>([[User talk:Aidan9382|talk]])</sub> 09:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

== WikitextParser ==

@[[User:Aidan9382|Aidan9382]] @[[User:Certes|Certes]] Hi, I'm back, I hope you're doing well ! ^^ Today I restored the version of [[Module:Transcluder/sandbox]] that uses [[Module:WikitextParser]], merged the latest changes, and fixed a few bugs. All test cases are looking good now (except one at [[Template:Excerpt/testcases3]] but it's actually looking ''better'' in the sandbox version).

Why am I doing this? Basically, I'd like to sharpen the separation between all the generic, reusable functionality (WikitextParser), and all the arbitrary, ad-hoc functionality (Excerpt, Transclude lead excerpt, etc). Transcluder is caught somewhere in the middle. To accomplish this, I'd like to:

# Move to production the new version of Transcluder that uses WikitextParser
# Update Module:Excerpt, Module:Excerpt/portals and the few other modules that use Transcluder to use WikitextParser instead
# Deprecate Transcluder

I think this sharper separation of concerns will make development, maintenance and documentation much easier, and may lead to a wider reuse of the generic functionality than is currently the case. Do you agree? Kind regards, [[User:Sophivorus|Sophivorus]] ([[User talk:Sophivorus|talk]]) 15:11, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

:I've not looked at the code or other details but that sounds like a very good idea in principle.  My original version, which had much less functionality, never aimed to be a generic wikitext parser.  To make it quick to run (and write), I made several assumptions that are almost always true in practice but could break in theory.  If you now have a parser that works in more general cases, that is a splendid achievement which will be useful elsewhere in Wikipedia and should certainly be made available separately. [[User:Certes|Certes]] ([[User talk:Certes|talk]]) 16:20, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
::Glad you like the idea! After some more progress with Transcluder, I figured out it doesn't make much sense to rewrite Transcluder to use WikitextParser, only to then rewrite Excerpt to skip Transcluder. So I went ahead and started rewriting Excerpt directly. I just published the first MAJOR set of changes to [[Module:Excerpt/sandbox]]. There's still a long way to go, but I had to pause at some point. This will also be an opportunity to improve the architecture overall. Looking forward to continuing work next week! [[User:Sophivorus|Sophivorus]] ([[User talk:Sophivorus|talk]]) 14:04, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
:::Hi again! I'm almost done with replacing Module:Transcluder with Module:WikitextParser. All test cases look ok to me. I'll leave Module:Excerpt/sandbox for a few days in case anyone wants to review it. In the meantime I'll continue debugging. Then, if all goes well, I'll move the new version to production. Cheers! [[User:Sophivorus|Sophivorus]] ([[User talk:Sophivorus|talk]]) 13:36, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
::::@[[User:Certes|Certes]] @[[User:Aidan9382|Aidan9382]] Hi guys, today I did another run of tests and fixes, this time using real-world articles as well as test cases. We're getting closer to deployment. Next time I'll do some more testing and debugging, and if nothing big comes up, I may deploy. However, I'm a bit weary about performance and I'm not sure how to test or improve it. Also, honestly I'm not very sure about the difference between mw.ustring and string, so I'm not sure when to use each and what bugs this may lead to, especially in wikis other than enwiki. If you find a minute to look into any of this, I'll appreciate it greatly. Thanks! [[User:Sophivorus|Sophivorus]] ([[User talk:Sophivorus|talk]]) 14:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::[[mw:Extension:Scribunto/Lua_reference_manual#String_library|string]] can be faster but only handles single-byte ASCII characters 0–255. [[mw:Extension:Scribunto/Lua_reference_manual#Ustring_library|ustring]] works on UTF-8 encoded strings and handles all Unicode characters, so is safer if accented letters etc. may appear.  I haven't been following the development more generally since I retired. [[User:Certes|Certes]] ([[User talk:Certes|talk]]) 14:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
::::::I've worked on performance quite a bit for other modules, so I could take a look if you have anything of specific interest (or just want me to generally check it over). And yes, the difference between ustring and string is unicode support, but if you're extracting text between always-ASCII characters and reusing that, using regular string ''should'' be fine (in-practice testing is the best way to find out - try having cases with non-english text and seeing how they behave). [[User:Aidan9382|Aidan9382]] <sub>([[User talk:Aidan9382|talk]])</sub> 18:41, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::::@[[User:Certes|Certes]] Hi! I just read your user page and it's so sad you decided to leave for the reasons you did. Sad, but understandable, as I can partly agree with your assessment of the WMF. That being said, let me just THANK YOU for all the work you've done over so many years. As I often tried to express during our talks, I was always surprised and thankful for your sharp eye. This module (among many other things, I'm sure) wouldn't be the same or wouldn't even be possible without you. So farewell my friend, and I hope you find other more worthy projects where to pour your time, knowledge, skill and passion!
:::::::@[[User:Aidan9382|Aidan9382]] Yes, please! After some testing, I finally understood the difference between string and ustring, but I'm afraid that means I'll have to review all the methods and test cases, especially at WikitextParser, with this new knowledge (*sigh*). In the meantime, if you feel like doing that performance review, I'll be happy to implement your recommendations, if you don't do it yourself. Thank you!! [[User:Sophivorus|Sophivorus]] ([[User talk:Sophivorus|talk]]) 14:27, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
::::::::{{ping|Sophivorus}} I've gone ahead and ran through both [[Module:Excerpt/sandbox]] and [[Module:WikitextParser]] and given them some performance improvements (thanks old me for making the utility to actually be able to do this), and it now actually runs faster than the current live version by a small margin (~1.2x, and about 2x faster than what the sandbox used to be), at least in the test case I'm using. Most of the remaining computation time is just handling the template blacklist (~50% of all execution time on its own), but it's at least far less than it was before. 
::::::::I don't ''think'' any of the changes I've done would've broken functionality, but I'd look them over yourself and test just to be sure, since some of the changes are subtle and there might be a case I'm not thinking of. [[User:Aidan9382|Aidan9382]] <sub>([[User talk:Aidan9382|talk]])</sub> 22:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::@[[User:Aidan9382|Aidan9382]] Thanks so much! I'll review, test and learn from your changes sometime this week, and hopefully deploy too. Cheers! [[User:Sophivorus|Sophivorus]] ([[User talk:Sophivorus|talk]]) 12:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

== Bizarre insertion of source pagename into a ref name in a citation example ==

Please have a look at [[Talk:Ratneshwar Mukherjee#Writing citations for sources in non-Latin scripts that promote Verifiability]]. The content there consists entirely of this line:
: <code><nowiki>{{excerpt|User talk:TrueMoriarty|Writing citations for sources in non-Latin scripts that promote Verifiability|hat=no}}</nowiki></code>
Please examine the line in the rendered excerpt on the linked page, in which the {{kbd|ref}} tag appears (it's the top line in shaded &lt;pre> box). It looks like this:
: <code><nowiki><ref name="User talk:TrueMoriarty Senagupta-2010"></nowiki></code>
But the original of that line, found at the excerpt source, [[User talk:TrueMoriarty#Writing citations for sources in non-Latin scripts that promote Verifiability|here]], looks like this:
: <code><nowiki><ref name="Senagupta-2010"></nowiki></code>
Somehow, {{tl|excerpt}} has inserted the Excerpt source pagename into the ref name line in the example citation. 

'''Note:''' the source page is currently at Afd, so this example may disappear if consensus is to delete. A no-save test here just now duplicates the behavior. Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 21:30, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] Hi! This is expected behavior. The reason is that when doing an excerpt, it often happens that a reference in the transcluded page has the same name as a reference in the transcluding page, causing an error. Thus, this module (actually, [[Module:Transcluder]]) prepends the name of the transcluded page to the reference name. [[User:Sophivorus|Sophivorus]] ([[User talk:Sophivorus|talk]]) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

:: {{u|Sophivorus}}, that makes sense, thank you. I have added new subsection {{slink|Template:Excerpt|Ref name collision|nopage=yes}} to the doc page; can you please have a look and see if I have got it right, and adjust as needed if not? Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 14:55, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
:::Yep, you got it right, thx! [[User:Sophivorus|Sophivorus]] ([[User talk:Sophivorus|talk]]) 15:45, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
:::: {{u|Sophivorus}}, one other thing I thought of: will Transcluder supply double quotes if they aren't there already? Quotes are not required in the original ref name if it has no embedded blanks, but as Transcluder appears to add the new name with a trailing blank, they would be. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 18:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::Yes, Transcluder supplies double quotes. :-) [[User:Sophivorus|Sophivorus]] ([[User talk:Sophivorus|talk]]) 13:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

== Nihongo tag excluded from excerpt ==

At [[Portal:Speculative fiction]], one of the articles, [[Tokyo Mew Mew]], has its title excluded in the excerpt. It's listed as #277 [[Portal:Speculative fiction/Selected works|here]]. Any ideas why it's not showing the title? It's wrapped in {{tlx|Nihongo}}, so perhaps there's some conflicting code? Thanks for any help! ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<span style="color:darkgreen;">日本穣</span>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<span style="color:blue;">投稿</span>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<span style="color:maroon;">Join WP Japan</span>]]!</small> 00:26, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
:Nevermind. Looks like someone used "onlyinclude" tags and excluded the title for whatever reason. I've fixed that. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<span style="color:darkgreen;">日本穣</span>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<span style="color:blue;">投稿</span>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<span style="color:maroon;">Join WP Japan</span>]]!</small> 21:32, 30 April 2025 (UTC)