Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chips mackinolty

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Will move it to correct capitals. -Splash 01:58, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chips mackinolty

Vanity/Non-notable (Only 260 Google hits) -- one of a gazillion one-time protesters who found his way into a newspaper or two. Paul Klenk 07:26, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. His artworks have been exhibited at major Australian galleries such as the National Gallery of Australia, and the Australian Centre for Photography. Certainly notable. Cnwb 07:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Kappa 11:51, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I originally greeted the intial editor to request tagging of the picture now used in this article (it is taken from http://www.nga.gov.au/federation, so may not be a problem in that), they may have gone offline as no reply/action on this yet. I have left a message to inform them of this VfD, pointing them here. Alf 12:35, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If his work is displayed at the National Gallery of Australia, then he is a significant Australian artist. According to Australians: A History" published in 1987,he was an art dealer in Katherine who played a significant role in the development of Australian art. Capitalistroadster 18:32, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS After the vote should be moved to Chips Mackinolty. Capitalistroadster 18:32, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. 260 non-vanity, non-dupe Google hits for an non-Internet person is pretty good; not only that, the hits are from notable sources and document him as a notable person. Don't just count the Google hits; look at them. --Prosfilaes 21:25, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.