Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Antisemitism in Europe

Antisemitism in Europe (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Polygnotus has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There are ~50 countries in Europe. A large part of the content was just copypasted from each individual country article or the the Holocaust article. If this is intended as an overview article of antisemitism in Europe, then it should provide at most a quick summary and a link to the main article for each country. But doing that 50 times is a bit much. And the content we currently have is a mess. Most of the sources I can find are about antisemitism in country X, not about the continent as a whole. We got only 4 articles about antisemitism about current European countries (Spain, France, Armenia, Ireland). Antisemitism in Germany is a redirect to German Jews and Antisemitism in Romania is a redirect to History of Jews in Romania. Changing them all from "Antisemitism in-" to "History of Jews in-" may be an improvement because it widens the scope. And then we have Antisemitism in East Germany which no longer exists and Antisemitism in the Soviet Union which is not part of Europe. Polygnotus (talk) 09:19, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kirk Ouimet

Kirk Ouimet (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet our notability criteria. Likely UPE. BRP ^ever 03:43, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:43, 26 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

John W. Denboer

John W. Denboer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Reads promotional. Fails to meet GNG or any other notability criteria from what I see. BRP ^ever 03:38, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep

The subject appears to meet the requirements of WP:GNG based on multiple independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage of his work and recognition.

Independent coverage:

• Forbes
• MarketWatch
• Newsweek
• AL.com
• Washington Independent
• MobiHealthNews

Awards documented in reliable sources:

• APA Division 40 Blue Ribbon Award by American Psychological Association
• National Academy of Neuropsychology Outstanding Dissertation Award
• Phoenix Business Journal “40 Under 40”

These references provide independent verification of his professional work and recognitions. I agree that the article could be improved by reducing promotional tone, and I am willing to help with that. However, the sourcing shows that the subject meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eggotypo (talk • contribs) 05:24, 19 July 2025 (UTC) Eggotypo (talk) 05:38, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:38, 26 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Energize Lab

Energize Lab (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Bobherry has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possibly fails notability requirements. Bobherry Talk My Changes 21:04, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - unclear what this is talking about. Talks about characters and robotic teams. Is this a show? A team? CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:09, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:04, 25 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ralph Sosa

Ralph Sosa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Fails WP:GNG. Barras talk 20:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:49, 25 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Timeline of the future

Timeline of the future (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Some sort of WP:CRYSTAL. Incomplete, not really useful imo. Barras talk 20:38, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Keep While I agree with CRYSTAL, I do think this article does belong here and is notable enough. I know there is articles on the enwiki about the same topics. Also there is plenty of sources for this page in my opinion. I know I may be a minority but I personally enjoy reading the future timeline articles. This could be possibly expanded to make it more complete also. Bobherry Talk My Changes 21:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

• hard Delete that is what i am leaning toward. It is not encyclopedic; the POV starts with "... can be predicted with a comfortable level of accuracy". Oh my! Snow close should be considered. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:B5DA:A453:E622:41E6 (talk) 04:44, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:38, 25 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Aliia Rozа

Aliia Rozа (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Has been deleted on enwiki. See en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliia Rozа. Barras talk 20:07, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:07, 25 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jackrabbit (TV series)

Jackrabbit (TV series) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable (yet). Barras talk 19:32, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:32, 25 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Clark Influence

Clark Influence (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:NCORP, sources do not appear to even mention the company. Ternera (talk) 14:56, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:56, 25 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rayan Hamda Barhoumi

Rayan Hamda Barhoumi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Barras talk 14:42, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:42, 25 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tory Green (entrepreneur)

Tory Green (entrepreneur) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG, also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tory Green (entrepreneur). --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:13, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:13, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

David Thomas King School

David Thomas King School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. Coverage is all about using a lottery process for enrolment but it isn't just this school who does it, it's a district/school board issue. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:08, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Risaiole

Risaiole (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 20:17, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:17, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Discrimination against transgender women

Discrimination against transgender women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is merely defining what discrimination against transgendered women could be without sources. It is unclear from the text why this form of discrimination requires its own article. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:09, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Also nominating Discrimination against transgender men (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) which is fairly identical.

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• There's a medium-length article about this on the normal English Wikipedia. But CountryANDWestern, I think you forgot to include Discrimination against transgender men. canadachick (talk) 19:27, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  You’re right about the En article. If ours looked more like that (don’t know if it would be at the same time they use there), I wouldn’t have nominated it here. Right now, it’s not showing why it should stand as an article within its text. And, yea, the other one presents with the same concerns, but it didn’t pop up in the category I was working with today when I stumbled upon this one. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:37, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  CountryANDWestern, please nominate both, otherwise I will vote  Keep. Or redirect both to transphobia. canadachick (talk) 19:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  I’ve added Discrimination against transgender men, too. I think your suggestion of the redirect can be a valid outcome here too. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:21, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

• Merge into Transwoman.--We do not have Transgender inequality, a title at En-wiki.--Merging into Transgender, is maybe something to consider. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:4414:1C0C:15BB:A3F8 (talk) 20:20, 17 July 2025 (UTC) /2001:2020:359:B9D1:4414:1C0C:15BB:A3F8 (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
•  (change conflict)  I think redirect both to Transphobia for the time being until we have issues that are specific to trans men/women which these do not have – for instance in the UK there is a (incorrect) narrative being spread that transgender women want to get into women's bathrooms/changing rooms, beat cisgender women in sports etc, so trans women are often the main targets. Just to be clear I also think these names are good places for an article on transmisogyny or transmisandry – I wasn't familiar with these terms myself as a native speaker, and I doubt one would know about them as a non-native speaker. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 20:25, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:09, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dipper

Dipper (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources not provided for verifiability or notability. Not sure if this aspect of swimming machines of the 18th (I think) century needs its own article. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Develo

Develo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unclear how this is a notable developer kit CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:21, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:21, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Descendants of Charles II of England

Descendants of Charles II of England (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: We are not a genealogy site. This relies primarily on a genealogy database, a potentially unreliable source. Allowing this article would open up for similar articles from other historical figures, and by what standard would we decide who’s allowed to have articles about their lineage and who isn’t? CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:01, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:01, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:AI-generated pages for deletion

Category:AI-generated pages for deletion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Pointless category, doesn't provide any use not already provided by the standard QD category. No other rationale has separate categories either and I can't see a compelling case for why this one should be different. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 17:08, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• It would make sense to have this category for articles only signed by one person and having articles then automatically be moved to the normal category, when a second person endorses the deletion. Or in short: I wouldn't delete it, but modify the usage. -Barras talk 17:35, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  @Barras I am wondering if we should keep the pages in both categories if endorsement parameter is filled. Mostly because if it gets misfilled it will end up only being at quick deletion category making it harder for patroller to find.--BRP ^ever 21:01, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  I can ofc make it switch category upon endorsement, but it is not without downside. Template has no way of knowing if the endorsement parameter is filled right or not. BRP ^ever 21:16, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep It's different to every other QD criterion in that it requires endorsement (ie attention from other editors) which I think is a compelling reason. How else do you intend for these tagged articles to be tracked for an endorsement? --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:29, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  The pages are added to the standard QD category anyway, the endorsement can easily be done from there.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 21:42, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  They aren't added until the endorsement is given, as they are not actually eligible for QD until that point. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:43, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  Provided that the deleting admin was different than the tagger, it would be, per the wording at WP:AQD, which says that it only applies if two or more people endorse the A7 (in this case the tagger and the deleting admin would fulfil the those), and by the books that would be a valid A7, so the mere presence of a tag and a deletion under it would be fulfilling the criteria, with no endorsement needed.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 21:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  A7 says recommended for deletion by at least two editors (bolding mine). That is quite different from other QDs, the passing admin isn't recommending other pages for QD as such at all, they are just approving it. It may also be a good time for me to mention that this has been discussed by the community already over the past few weeks at Wikipedia:Simple talk#Handling AI articles, in which the idea of a category was suggested and agreed by a few editors. That doesn't mean that the category now has the right to exist forever of course but a lot of the points you are making have been addressed there already. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  By deleting a page, they are (except in rare cases or RfDs) explixitly endorsing the rationale cited.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 22:09, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  Of course, otherwise we would decline it, but we are not the ones recommending it for deletion as the policy worded requires. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:14, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  In cases like QDs, endorsements are also simultaneously recommending its deletion so (as I said above), as long as a tag is present on the page, a deletion would fulfil the wording of the policy.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 22:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  A deletion does not always means endorsement or recommendation. The gist of the discussion we had, if you follow it has been to seek two endorsement with a 3rd independent user (admin) deleting it. Otherwise it would be no different from any other qd criteria.-- BRP ^ever 22:27, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  Not before the endorsement parameter is filled. BRP ^ever 21:44, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep without this category the QD category would be confusing. Without a holding category we would have an overpopulation of the QD category and wouldn't know which articles require an endorsement. The already agreed upon criteria states that A7 requires two editors to recommend it for deletion. Only then can an admin come along and do the deletion itself. I personally feel that two endorsements aren't needed but this is community consensus and you had an opportunity to chime in and didn't bring it up then. I feel it's too late now; the policy is written. fr33kman 22:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  I should say we can always revisit this later as well, it may be that this criterion ends up being too strict, or maybe AI is too difficult to detect, we can always change our mind, but revisiting the whole policy a few days after it's been implemented would be unnecessary. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:41, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  Yeah, we do need to adjust things as we go. I hope we can get some more work done on twinkle so the process become much smoother. I do like this idea over regular QD. BRP ^ever 06:59, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

  Of course consensus can always change but it's too soon to make major decisions now fr33kman 08:56, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep Like the others said Ai QDs require endorsement they should be kept separate from regular QDs. Bobherry Talk My Changes 21:09, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards

Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not clear that this aspect of the law is notable enough to require its own article CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:26, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:26, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dekanalog

Dekanalog (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem to be notable. This was previously kept at an RFd in 2022, but I’m not seeing notability, and the consensus of that RFD was a little iffy (one weak keep, one keep by the creator of the article, and one delete) CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:56, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Davoud Bagheri (futsal player)

Davoud Bagheri (futsal player) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not clearly shown through reliable sources. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:26, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:26, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

David McMillan

David McMillan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established via significant coverage in reliable sources. Things I found via Google are basically press releases when he has transitioned jobs or profiles on employer websites. No evidence that the noted award is notable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:49, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:49, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jack Doepke

Jack Doepke (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Like David Hussey, I don’t see evidence he is notable with sources that aren’t just stating he played Ronald McDonald in commercials. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:21, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:21, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

David Hussey

David Hussey (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established through reliable sources. I’m not finding sources through Google searches that tell us much more than the fact he played Ronald McDonald. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:16, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:16, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

David Culhane

David Culhane (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be borderline notability leaving towards lacking notability. The fact it is written by his family and reads like an obituary tips it toward deletion. Multiple sources are cited to his children. The other references do not give him significant coverage. CountryANDWestern (talk) 01:01, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete he's definitely notable having apparently winning an Emmy and being a named contributor to a Peabody award winning piece but the article is a complete mess with no rhyme or reason to the flow of the article. It needs a complete rewrite by someone who knows the subject but isn't involved with the subject fr33kman 02:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete I actually disagree with the above argument, but I think the subject fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage. --IWI (talk) 05:30, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:01, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

David Burhani

David Burhani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to meet notability standards. Only played in Tanzanian soccer league which is not a highly rated league. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:56, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dark-ego-vehicle principle

Dark-ego-vehicle principle (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem to be a notable concept that is significant covered in secondary sources. Three of the six sources are the primary researcher and two are summaries of that research. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:52, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete is a recent concept means that someone just made it up. It seems kinda obvious that Krispenz and Bertrams are motivated by political ideology, not science.[1] "Everyone who disagrees with me is a narcissist" is not a great hypothesis. Polygnotus (talk) 00:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
• I am not a psychologist, so it is not my domain of study. What I see though is that scientific publications are referenced in the article. I am in no position to question these publications, but Current Psychology and Archives of Sexual Behavior look like well-known scientific publications. So, in my book, this is a keep.--Eptalon (talk) 08:53, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  @Eptalon: I don't think every survey that someone wrote a paper about is automatically notable. It is difficult to find reliable numbers, but Google says that over 5.14 million academic articles are published per year which gives a rough indication. en:WP:ACADEMIC is pretty strict (although thats more for people than papers, but I couldn't find one for papers). Polygnotus (talk) 13:40, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  What I am saying is: the two journals cited look reliable. I am not a psychologist/psychiatrist, so it is extremely difficult for me to ascertain whether an article published in such a journal is reliable. People doing their PhD will also publish articles in uch journals. But If we are indeed discussing at this level, likely we are not discussing notability. As an example, few people will use en:IP over Avian Carriers. There are at least 2 RFCs (internet stndards dealing with it, 1149 and 2249; possibly 6214). Eptalon (talk) 13:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

• hard Delete - that is what i am leaning toward.--If it had been a notable theory, then we could have said, "Well, it really would fit in one of the articles at En-wiki, so now we can start a stub about (the relevant en-wiki topic)."--Anyway, the topic is not notable. It can not (reasonably), even be mentioned in the "Phsychopathy" article.--Is there any similarity between 'this discussion, and the Ambipolar electric field situation'? Well, En-wiki is not mentioning the Darth Vader-ego-principle this theory, while in the case of Ambipolar electric field, that topic is mentioned. Be that as it may.--Will this be the time, that the small wikipedia, gets things right (ahead of En-wiki dealing with it in the future)? When it is Deleted, for not being notable 'yet', then we will have gotten things right.--And, are there many cases where non-notable theories get mentioned in notable sources? Yeah, happens all the time.--If my perspectives have been helpful,then fine. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:4414:1C0C:15BB:A3F8 (talk) 18:07, 17 July 2025 (UTC) /2001:2020:359:B9D1:4414:1C0C:15BB:A3F8 (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:52, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dar Tama

Dar Tama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is nearly incomprehensible. Does not clearly define what “Dar Tama” is. It’s not clear that this topic meets our notability standards based on what’s presented. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:47, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I rarely use this word but it's sheer gibberish! Totally incomprehensible and completely unwikified to boot fr33kman 03:07, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dar_Tama_Department This text cannot be used as the basis of a new article, so WP:TNT. Polygnotus (talk) 03:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete I can't see a reason to keep. Not even sure what the content is saying. Not really fixable. --IWI (talk) 05:24, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:47, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Daniel Hernandez (journalist)

Daniel Hernandez (journalist) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to fail GNG. Nominated for an award but not a recipient of it. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete not notable, the award is well-known but a single nomination likely fails GNG, food editor is not notable itself fr33kman 03:10, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:36, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mundian To Bach Ke

Mundian To Bach Ke (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

The Sophocrat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Entirely AI-generated and unsourced article. No useful content. Sophocrat (talk) 23:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete an admin should close this as an AI generated article. --IWI (talk) 03:28, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:32, 23 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

SNVRK

SNVRK (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, created by user with conflict of interest, xwiki spam. See q:SNVRK and w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SNVRK Ternera (talk) 18:10, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - was about to delete it as A4. -Barras talk 18:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

  Ah sorry, I considered tagging it for QD but figured I should stay on the safe side. Ternera (talk) 18:21, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

  If you feel the need to delete it because there isn't enough sources yet, go ahead. It will soon have enough sources to be 100% verifiably notable. It can always be recreated at another time. SNVRKOTICS (talk) 18:34, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

  SNVRK is associated with notable people, so it's only a matter of time before the press documents more of his life. SNVRKOTICS (talk) 18:35, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

  Were not a crystal ball, things need to be notable now not in the future fr33kman 03:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:10, 23 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dani Oliva

Dani Oliva (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem to meet GNG. Many sources are press releases or similar fare. I don’t think you can truly call yourself a platinum award winner because you helped a legal client. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:25, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:25, 23 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DXP

DXP (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources provided. Unclear if this programming block is notable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:21, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:21, 23 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DJ Many

DJ Many (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Questionable notability. One song he collaborated on hit gold status, not platinum. Not a significant amount of coverage. The Broadway World article seemed promising but it’s a very puff, PR type piece. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:54, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:54, 23 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Muhammad Azizul Islam

Muhammad Azizul Islam (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem notable; bulk of sources provided are primary from his institutions. Lone award noted does not seem to be notable. Has been declined several times as a draft at En. due to lack of notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:30, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:30, 23 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Cécile Robert

Cécile Robert (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unclear what aspect of swimming career makes her notable. Seems like she competed in a few races (not clear that these are notable competitions) and finished before some men. If kept, rewrite is needed as it is written in both past and present tense. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:22, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:22, 23 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Will Maclean (author of The Apparition Phase)

Will Maclean (author of The Apparition Phase) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TDKR Chicago 101 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable author. His book might be, but the author himself not so much. No en wiki article either TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:33, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:33, 22 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Carlos Wakim

Carlos Wakim (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG, promotional sources --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:06, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yash Negi

Yash Negi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:04, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Yash Negi has worked in the computer and software field, and is mentioned in the book Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies (IC3T 2023), Volume 2 (2024). He also appears on platforms like Freeway, has an IMDb rating, and a strong following on social media apps, which supports his notability. I know these references are quite low but i asked him to send more —This unsigned comment was added by Imperial khasah (talk • changes) 01:14, 15 July 2025 (UTC) (UTC)

  Are you asking Yash Negi, the subject of this article, to send you more references? Do be aware that conflict of interest editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete - I think it would qualify as A4. No claim to notability here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

  He is recognized as one of India’s youngest tech entrepreneurs and digital marketing experts. is a sufficient enough claim for a4 --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 13:15, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Fails WP:GNG, lacks coverage from reliable sources. Ternera (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Fails GNG. Bobherry Talk My Changes 01:34, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:04, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

JustFoodforDogs

JustFoodforDogs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG even though it interestingly appears to claim coverage in independent sources in the lede. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:03, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:03, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

JTEC Energy

JTEC Energy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Most impressive award seems to be the TIME one but even then that is a list of 250 companies in which it is 94th, certainly doesn't demonstrate notability. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:00, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:00, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Atsuga Shimizu

Atsuga Shimizu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:48, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Noriyuki Kawamata

Noriyuki Kawamata (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:42, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:42, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Takeshi Satouchi

Takeshi Satouchi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:41, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:41, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yoji Mizuguchi

Yoji Mizuguchi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:40, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:40, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Koichi Hashigaito

Koichi Hashigaito (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koichi Hashigaito. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:35, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:35, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Akihiro Kameda

Akihiro Kameda (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:31, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pablo Giralt

Pablo Giralt (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Air Crash Investigation Special Report

Air Crash Investigation Special Report (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This appears to claim to be a spinoff from Air Crash Investigation (also called Mayday) but I can't seem to find any evidence of it even existing, let alone being notable. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:24, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:24, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2026 Formula 2 Championship

2026 Formula 2 Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Too early, imo. Further reasoning Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Formula 2 Championship. Barras talk 21:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per WP:NOTCRYSTAL. Ternera (talk) 13:53, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:01, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lightning International Holdings Limited

Lightning International Holdings Limited (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No apparent notability, merely advertising. Garsh (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:46, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Daniel Callihan

Daniel Callihan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Like Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Brunett kidnappings and murders, coverage is local in nature and does not establish him as a notable individual. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:05, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as not notable. -Barras talk 17:12, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Crossover (fiction)

Crossover (fiction) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Likely AI generated content with no sources and with complex language CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:20, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Donk

Donk (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, non-notable player but claims made fr33kman 03:53, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete based on its current AI-generated form, but with the preference for making a new article from scratch, per w:en:WP:TNT (which I wouldn't usually cite but... AI creates awful articles.) as I believe the subject passes GNG. [2][3][4] are all sources that can demonstrate notability. Being the #1 HLTV player of the year ([5]) is also significant. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:40, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

  see also w:en:donk (gamer) for references that can be used for a future recreation --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 11:30, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete I don't think he is notable (a large majority of the sources are not independent), but this version of the article cannot be used anyway because it is LLM generated and POV so that is moot. Polygnotus (talk) 21:29, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:53, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tercentenary Lectures

Tercentenary Lectures (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown for this event through independent, reliable sources. The lone source is the society’s website. Google searches are showing (as best as I can tell) a few lectures that got published subsequently, but nothing about the event itself. I see a mention in Nature from 1960 about it being an upcoming event but that’s the best I can find. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:18, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Poor Liz

Poor Liz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability of this film shown. Just an IMDb link. Google searches aren’t showing much. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:04, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:04, 21 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Nongmaiching Ching

Nongmaiching Ching (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability is not expressed via significant coverage for this land feature. Looking at the sources… the “mountain” (it’s only called a hill in the sources) is only mentioned in a sentence or two in each. I don’t see any claim in any of the sources that this is one of the most visited pilgrimage sites. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:59, 20 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Vibez Estates

Vibez Estates (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG as company and reads as promotional, does make a claim of notability but the awards themselves aren't notable fr33kman 00:03, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - there are many promotional pieces about the subject, but the criteria (WP:GNG) is not met by these pieces. No in depth coverage. --IWI (talk) 01:04, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:03, 20 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

N-iX

N-iX (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:CORP. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIX (company). --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:05, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I only see promotional pieces so, per nominator, I think it fails WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 23:08, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:05, 19 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Raj Kosaraju

Raj Kosaraju (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:04, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete clear fail of WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 01:05, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete - failed GNG for lack of sources Mrfixer2024 (talk) 19:33, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

  Mrfixer2024, please note that RfD is not a vote, so please do not make "per nom" comments as they do not help build a consensus for the RfD. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 11:33, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

  Yes it would be helpful to have a description of what the nominator says that you agree with. --IWI (talk) 02:29, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  I search on Google after seeing this link ,[6] if I could find credible sources to support some of his profile but couldn't that why I wrote Per norminator but thanks for the correctionsMrfixer2024 (talk) 10:43, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:04, 19 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Grailzee

Grailzee (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:03, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete we are the only Wikipedia to host this page, only 4 mentions via Google news all basically the same, all Google search hits are either the company site or social media or posts asking if the company is legit. Possibly a case of TOOSOON fr33kman 03:09, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:03, 19 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Emma Quinones

Emma Quinones (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NSINGER. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:01, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete biggest hit was #14 on a download list for a small island in the carribean and she's from New York, not signed to a notable label and no collaboration with notable artists. TOOSOON fr33kman 03:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

  Keep Please take the time to conduct further research. Emma Quinones collaborated with Fabo from the well-known D4L music group, widely recognized for the hit song Laffy Taffy, on a track titled She Lit She Hot. This song has garnered over 2.5 million views on Instagram, indicating notable public interest.

  Additionally, it’s important to recognize that an artist’s location, such as being from New York, does not limit their global reach or streaming potential. Audience size or country of origin should not be used to dismiss international notability.

  Furthermore, she has been featured in a published book that highlights notable artists setting trends on the internet, which adds to the evidence supporting her notability. Novadorodney98 (talk) 03:28, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

  You can't vote twice and all your comments must be in the discussion section not below the nominators comments fr33kman 03:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

  I've also struck the second keep !vote. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 10:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

• Keep Emma Quinones meets the criteria of WP:GNG and possibly WP:MUSICBIO (formerly WP:NSINGER) based on the following:

• 1. Significant Collaboration: She collaborated with Fabo, a founding member of the platinum-selling hip hop group D4L, known for the Billboard Hot 100 #1 hit Laffy Taffy. While Fabo’s peak was in the 2000s, he remains a recognizable figure in U.S. hip hop, and a collaboration with him demonstrates verifiable music industry engagement.
  2. Viral Public Reception: Their joint song, She Lit She Hot, has amassed over 2.5 million views on Instagram, which suggests notable public interest. While Instagram views alone do not confer notability, such metrics, when combined with published coverage, support recognition.
  3. Published Recognition: Emma Quinones is featured in a published book profiling notable emerging artists setting trends in the digital music space. The publication (title, publisher, and ISBN available upon request) references her on page 7, providing reliable, non-trivial, and independent coverage that satisfies WP:GNG.
  4. Geographic Bias: An artist’s origin in New York and chart success in smaller countries or territories should not be dismissed outright. Global music consumption is decentralized, and independent artists frequently find early success outside the U.S. mainstream. Many now-notable acts initially charted in niche or international markets before broader recognition.
• In light of the above, I respectfully recommend the article be improved, not deleted, as there appears to be a basis for meeting Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. Novadorodney98 (talk) 03:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
• Delete - There is a reason this was an A4 deletion previously. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

  There are claims of significance in this article in its current state, in particular debuting at number #14 on the St. Vincent iTunes chart with over 2.5 million views on instagram. The article doesn't even have to claim it passes notability guidelines to pass the A4 hurdle, it is a little bit lower than that. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 10:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:01, 19 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Swazer

Swazer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem to meet WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 21:12, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I was going to delete this as a QD A4 but saw it's up for RfD. Makes no claim of notability fr33kman 21:33, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

@Fr33kman: Sorry mate I'm a bit rusty, I was a bit too cautious. --IWI (talk) 21:36, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

It's okay, no harm done, it'll get deleted :) fr33kman 21:42, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep – Swazer is a real emerging Nigerian Afrobeat and R&B artist who has officially released songs on verified digital platforms including Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube Music, and SoundCloud. He has verifiable profiles on [https://musicbrainz.org/artist/10d770b3-e89a-47a5-a01f-550a9531fcfe MusicBrainz], [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q135286723 Wikidata], and has a growing fanbase across TikTok and Instagram. He is independently distributed via RouteNote and already has multiple published singles. Deletion would remove an opportunity for early documentation of an artist building notability. Wikipedia should aim to support emerging notable talent in a structured and factual way. Swazernasoboy (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete as per M7's, Fr33kmann's and my deletion as A4 some days ago. -Barras talk 22:41, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
• Delete as it is an unsimplified AI-generated article with no useful content. Sophocrat (talk) 23:57, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
• Quick Delete I agree this should be deleted as a A4 see page logs. It also shows no signs of being simple. It also appears to me a major editor might have a coi. Bobherry Talk My Changes 21:13, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:12, 19 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bondina Elangbam

Bondina Elangbam (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be independently notable. The bulk of this article and its references is about her being childhood friends with a celebrity and that celebrity has promoted her works. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:13, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:13, 19 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Coat of arms of Manipur

Coat of arms of Manipur (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability of this coat of arms is not shown. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:54, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Merge into Kangleipak kingdom. HAOREIMA (Khurumjari) 19:58, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:54, 19 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Burger Kings

Burger Kings (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Enwiki doesn't seem to think it's a notable episode. I can't find sufficient coverage myself for it to meet WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 19:45, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep On English Wikipedia, the article for Burger Kings is currently a draft article that hasn't been published yet CallumBen13 (talk) 19:24, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

  That’s not a reason to keep it here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:34, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete not a notable episode, no reason to keep fr33kman 03:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:45, 19 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Forum Asset Management

Forum Asset Management (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doubtable notability. Barras talk 18:40, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep I am actually aware of this company from back when I was an IT engineer. They are quite well-known in the finance world, have quite a few articles regarding them via Google news and also have an article on enwiki. Not a great article but notable fr33kman 03:26, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:40, 19 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Al Mahwait City District (2nd nomination)

Al Mahwait City District (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The city district itself is likely not notable, and a relevant redirect page does not exist MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 00:42, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:42, 19 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

AP3 (Romanian band)

AP3 (Romanian band) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

70.89.176.181 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This band lacks notability. The article has no sources and contains speculative future content. 70.89.176.181 (talk) 20:38, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete not notable. -Barras talk 21:04, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:38, 18 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kweme

Kweme (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't see the notability here. Barras talk 21:49, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment:: enwiki has an article about this singer: w:Anita Osikweme Osikhena. Ternera (talk) 20:25, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
• Keep- As a musician she has performed at top events with Nigerian A list artist and entertainers Davido[7],

[8] w:Ayo Makun[9] Uchbebe show [10]w:Ayra Starr[11] As an actress, she has featured in Nollywood movies like The Island [12] and has graced the stage as the model host for the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) in 2019. [13] she contested 43rd edition of the prestigious Miss Nigeria Pageantry and was a runner up [14], [15] additional sources to support her notability [16],[17] Mrfixer2024 (talk) 19:08, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:49, 16 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Omar Juarez

Omar Juarez (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doubtable notability for me. A Google search comes up with other individuals first. Barras talk 18:27, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep and change the article name to El Oms to make it completely accurate.

The article contains reliable sources that are more or less enough support the topic's notability. Some points from the rules that the article follows:

1. WP:ANYBIO (The person has been given a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times.).

2. WP:CREATIVE (The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work. This work has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length movie, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.)

As for WP:GNG, his work was recently nominated for a Grammy Awards,[18] so more new sources are likely to come.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.241.144.126 (talk • contribs) 08:30, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:27, 16 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Leima Jagoi

Leima Jagoi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Significant/notability of this form of dance is not shown. The five sources provided are mentions of the type of dance in single sentences. There is not significant coverage of the dance form provided. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• It's significantly performed outside India, in numerous western countries by the diaspora community as well as culture lovers. HAOREIMA (Khurumjari) 16:52, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

  Can you show that via reliable sources that show significant coverage? CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:12, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

  Done in the article. HAOREIMA (Khurumjari) 19:55, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

  Again, those are just passing mentions of it, not showing any significant coverage. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:07, 14 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tide Pod Challenge

Tide Pod Challenge (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Just another internet challenge. Maybe we could merge it with TikTok or wherever it appeared. Barras talk 19:12, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I think it would be better to have a page like en's on the "Consumption of Tide Pods" which has been a long-standing issue, where the TikTok challenge is just one part of it. Chuck Schumer for instance said "I saw one [Tide Pod] on my staffer's desk and I wanted to eat it." It is quite beyond just the TikTok challenge, as the company has had to change its packaging to adjust for children eating them, people even dying etc. [19] [20] are some sources about it. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 13:19, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
• Administrator note: time from start of inclusion on rfd. -Barras talk 14:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:12, 1 July 2025 (UTC) 14:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Deleted as WP:QD#A7 by Eptalon. Barras talk 07:29, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Innovative Journal Of Pediatrics

Innovative Journal Of Pediatrics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources are totally unrelated. Another spam, PAID article with marginal or no claim to notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - per nomination. -Barras talk 17:29, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
• Comment - no mention at en-wiki,if asked. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:4414:1C0C:15BB:A3F8 (talk) 18:21, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for the information. However, we have verified that the Innovative Journal of Pediatrics is currently mentioned on the English Wikipedia. CivicEditor41 (talk) 18:25, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  Zero mention, of anything that is notable.--Delete is fine with me. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:4414:1C0C:15BB:A3F8 (talk) 20:13, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

  Who is we? CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:22, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

• Administrator note: - There has been some spamming of similiar articles. Most have been deleted. All accounts related to that have been blocked. I deleted several articles already. -Barras talk 16:15, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:26, 24 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Barras talk 21:09, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Man Down

Man Down (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

166.140.230.93 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think "Man Down" by Richie Stringini meets the notability guidelines. 166.140.230.93 (talk) 21:01, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete doesn't even try to make a claim of notability fr33kman 03:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete per above. Bobherry Talk My Changes 21:05, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:01, 18 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Barras talk 21:08, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Laser engraving

Laser engraving (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Likely AI generated. Complex. Being used as a vehicle to spam Karkhana Makerspace like the other articles by this author. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:46, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I think this topic could be notable, but the article would need to be completely rewritten to remove the AI content and advertising. Ternera (talk) 21:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Notable topic however, the article is not simple at all. Bobherry Talk My Changes 22:12, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete AI generated Complex text fr33kman 22:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:46, 18 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Barras talk 21:08, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Rosal

Rosal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

70.89.176.181 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article doesn't seem useful. If "rosal" is just a Tagalog word for a white rose, it doesn't need to have an article here. 70.89.176.181 (talk) 20:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:34, 18 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Barras talk 15:07, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Kasre assault (1999)

Kasre assault (1999) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

81.109.99.117 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject fails notability; only two sources mention the incident and both are unreliable. This does not meet the general notability guidelines. 81.109.99.117 (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:09, 17 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Barras talk 15:06, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

List of Hong Kong dissidents

List of Hong Kong dissidents (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: For the same reasons as Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/List of Chinese dissidents. These are potential BLP violations as the main editor of this article is deciding whether or not someone is considered a dissident rather than using sources that label the subjects as such. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:15, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

en:Wikipedia:Notability_(events)#Criminal_acts and en:Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#People_accused_of_crime. The government decided whether someone is a dissident, I didn't decide that whether someone is a dissident. Yilangderen (talk) 23:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete definitely BLP violation, where are the sources, not a notable list, and parts of it aren't even in English fr33kman 03:34, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

  en:Murder of Poon Hiu-wing explains the situation. Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons There is no mentioning of the exact location of Chan Tong Kai. The news say that he is not in Taiwan, that's it. Chan Tong Kai's privacy is protected. Yilangderen (talk) 23:31, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:15, 18 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. There have been some improvements. Barras talk 15:02, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Arquivo.pt

Arquivo.pt (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Site is not notable, fails WP:GNG and the article is clearly written by AI. Ternera (talk) 13:12, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep - Arquivo.pt is clearly notable per WP:GNG. It is Portugal’s national web archive, operated by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), and has preserved over 1 petabyte of web data since the 1990s.

• Arquivo.pt is used globally, including in Wikipedia articles across multiple languages to combat link rot and preserve references. This means that when a source cited in a Wikipedia article disappears from the live web, a preserved version from Arquivo.pt can be used instead. This ensures that readers and editors can still verify the original content. These archived links are often included directly in the reference sections of Wikipedia articles. It is not the articles themselves that are archived, but rather the sources they cite. This demonstrates the practical notability of Arquivo.pt as a tool that directly supports Wikipedia’s mission of preserving knowledge and ensuring verifiability. Examples include:
  • Thomas Davenport (Italian)
  • Movierung (German)
  • Henry Synck (English)
  • Aminet (Simple English)
  • Mark Kirkland (Czech)
  • The L Word (French)

Note that none of the articles above are from the Portuguese Wikipedia, and the topics are unrelated to Portugal - demonstrating Arquivo.pt’s international utility.

• It has been covered in multiple independent, reliable sources:
  • Público article on COVID-19 and web archiving
  • Diário de Notícias article on the economic value of web preservation
  • Hoje Macau article on preserving media websites
  • NAU interview on the importance of digital preservation
• It has received national awards:
  • Digital Transformation Award 2024
  • Best Digital Service 2022

The article is written in Simple English, as expected for this project. If the tone or structure needs improvement, it can be edited - not deleted.

Adnarimiranda (talk) 14:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment: this is hard because the topic itself is certainly notable but article is badly written (most likely by AI) and needs a complete rewrite using RSes from independent third-party sources that talk about or review the site itself rather than a bunch of disconnected fact. So keep if it gets fixed but delete if it stays as it is fr33kman 21:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

  Good point. I found the enwiki article for this website, which contains some sources that could be used in the article here. Ternera (talk) 21:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for the thoughtful comments. I'd like to offer a few clarifications.

  First, a gentle caution about the growing tendency to label any imperfect or overly clean text as "AI-written". A few years ago, we might have simply said "this article needs work". Now, it's increasingly common to say "this must be AI" - whether the writing is too simple, too complex, too polished, or too rough. That assumption can be misleading and risks discouraging good-faith contributors.

  In this case, the article was written by me, not by AI. I've created several articles on Simple Wikipedia using the same approach: selecting key concepts and explaining them in a way that a child or English learner could understand. That's the spirit of this project, as stated clearly on the Main Page:

  "The Simple English Wikipedia is for everyone, such as children and adults who are learning English."

  The article is not a "bunch of disconnected facts", but a simplified summary of the most important aspects of Arquivo.pt, written in a way that avoids technical jargon. It follows the same structure I used in other articles I've created, such as:

  • Brewster Kahle
  • Web archiving
  • Makoto Nagao
  • Digital preservation
  • Digital library

  If the article needs improvement, that's completely fair - and there are many appropriate ways to address that, such as using templates like:

  • Article issues
  • Expand English
  • Refimprove section
  • Cleanup rewrite

  But per the deletion policy, article quality alone is not a valid reason for deletion - especially when the topic is clearly notable and the article does not violate any core content policies.

  As the Main Page also reminds us:

  "Be bold! Your article does not have to be perfect, because other editors will fix it and make it better."

  So I warmly welcome improvements to the article's structure or sourcing. But deletion would be a disproportionate response to an article that is on-topic, policy-compliant, and aligned with the mission of Simple Wikipedia.

  Thank you again for engaging in the discussion.

  Adnarimiranda (talk) 16:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete - that is what i am leaning toward.--It just does not 'feel' encyclopedic.--Is there a major problem with tone and/or promotional feel and/or POV? Not sure, but something feels 'quite off'.--If my view is regarded as helpful, then fine. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:A83B:51A9:40E6:9C38 (talk) 15:11, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:12, 14 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:28, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Eric Rose

Eric Rose (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think this person passes WP:GNG. Barras talk 21:45, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:27, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Levi Heron

Levi Heron (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Might be a case of en:WP:TOOEARLY. Barras talk 19:09, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Barras talk 14:32, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Tharaka Wasalamudaliarachchi

Tharaka Wasalamudaliarachchi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article subject does not have coverage from independent 3rd party sources. Not notable, fails WP:GNG. Deleted on enwiki: w:Draft:Tharaka Wasalamudaliarachchi Ternera (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:42, 17 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Barras talk 14:31, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Waterbomb

Waterbomb (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources provided. No evidence that this form of origami is a notable thing. CountryANDWestern (talk) 03:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:06, 17 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Barras talk 14:31, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

List of Ugandan media owners

List of Ugandan media owners (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Complex article in the opening sentences. Sources don’t always align with what is being said. The first source is about some of these people having land claims it seems? The second source is just a list of tv stations and radio stations in the country.

It’s unclear that we need such an article. What makes someone a media “mogul”? And do we need a list of who owns what tv stations in the country? CountryANDWestern (talk) 01:50, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:50, 17 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests