Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople

WP:DSBOSSWP:DSBOSS

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Businesspeople. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Businesspeople|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Businesspeople. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

Purge page cache

watch

This list is included in more general lists of business-related deletions and people for deletion.

Businesspeople

Renée Elliott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of independent notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:59, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Massachusetts, and Mississippi. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:36, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vaishali Nigam Sinha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject don't have significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Most sources cited are either affiliated with the subject (e.g., UNDP, WEF), passing mentions, or promotional profiles (such as listicles and interviews). Thilsebatti (talk) 05:45, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:45, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Promotional article created by wp:SPA. Sources are not significant to pass the notability criteria. Zuck28 (talk) 07:54, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. In addition to the concerns pointed out above regarding single purpose editing and promotional material, I think it's worthy to mention that the company is notable but, it seems, the subject is not as well covered and lacks widespread coverage in independent, secondary sources. Auretechtalk, please also note that as an SPA you are required to disclose any external relationships with article subjects if you have one per our Conflict of interest policy. GuardianH 09:25, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jinal Jhaveri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, and I can't find sources to fill in the blanks here. Many of the sources are 404s ([1], [2], [3], etc.) and likely AI generated. Based on editor's previous history, also a likely undisclosed WP:COI. Snowycats (talk) 02:21, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople. Snowycats (talk) 02:21, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per highly AI generated and WP:COI. Sybercracker (talk)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Gujarat and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:40, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Kiarie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My WP:BEFORE turned up little if anything in the way of significant coverage in reliable independent sources so as to meet WP:BIO. There is a lot of fairly run-of-the mill stuff about companies the subject has worked for, with consequent passing mentions, but nothing substantial about the subject himself. Additionally, there is a strong thread of COI editing running through the article's history. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Kenya. SunloungerFrog (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:06, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Milind Sovani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page, which is mostly filled with promotional content and links to social media sites, and coverage from reliable sources is clearly lacking. Article would need to be rewritten entirely if kept. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:02, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:02, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Food and drink, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:55, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Phillip Sarofim

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was soft deleted back in April, then quickly recreated by the same editor. 多少战场龙's rationale from that AfD still holds: "it lacks significant coverage from independent sources that demonstrate notable achievements, making the subject appear less relevant. Additionally, it contains excessive citations that detract from the clarity and conciseness of the information presented." And as Oaktree b also pointed out, most of the coverage is about his relationship with Avril Lavigne. No in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:35, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Still a !delete, I don't see any updated sourcing showing that things have changed since last AfD in April. Sourcing was as I described last time. Oaktree b (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Hawaii, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Beattie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. A WP:BEFORE shows results about a musician, who is unrelated to the subject in question. Lack of reliable sourcing is also evident. Fails WP:GNG. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:07, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Religion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:07, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:40, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Looking into it, all the sources are from organizations he's worked with or spoken for. If he's notable, then I qualify for a Wikipedia article. I don't see any reasonable AtD. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: YT and linkedin as references? Totally non reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Baqi:) (talk) 06:43, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Local pastor doing good [4], very much non-notable for our purposes. Nothing much different than any other person doing a similar job. Oaktree b (talk) 14:34, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete completely non-notable. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:19, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not a single reliable source for a BLP. While not required, I did some searches online. Trying to find any sources are difficult, because false positives come up, including a videographer from Chicago and a friend of a friend who is an assistant chief of the New York City Department of Sanitation. Bearian (talk) 16:42, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yi Shi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:COI or WP:PE, with lots of PR spam sources. Tim (talk) 14:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tim (talk) 14:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: sources present in the article are enough to indicate he is notable ([5] [6] [7] at least). Cremastra (talk) 16:40, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cremastra that last Forbes source was written by a contributor rather than staff so usually not considered RS per WP:FORBESCON. S0091 (talk) 16:47, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping; you're right. There's this as well though, from the Chinese edition of Fortune (magazine). Cremastra (talk) 16:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cremastra the Chinese edition is a different publisher from Fortune (magazine) so does not have the same editorial oversight. You can see the difference by looking at https://fortune.com/about-us/ vs. https://www.fortunechina.com/first/c/2008-02/21/content_4825.htm. S0091 (talk) 17:35, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These Forbes lists contain only borderline sigcov. Source 2 is a school interviewing one of its alumni (so not independent) and source 3 is WP:FORBESCON. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 17:41, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, China, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:21, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is just a Gish gallop of trivial or promotional sources; there has also been a history here of using fake/SEO sources by a UDPE. I see Forbes contributor blogs, Entrepreneur contributor blogs, a VentureBeat contributor blog written by our favorite PR/SEO spammer Jon Stojan, user-generated material from LinkedIn, trivial directory listings, stories about the companies that don't mention the person (or mention him trivially), and so on. There are a few interviews, but those are hardly independent when establishing notability. Are there any examples of significant and independent sources? I was not able to locate anything searching externally, but that could be complicated by many others that share the same name, and a lot of self-serving PR that hides real sources. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just a disclaimer: I'm an employee at one of his companies and thus have a conflict of interest in this article. However, I’d like to add some independent references to address concerns about notability raised by the deletion rationale:

https://www.forbes.com/profile/shi-yi/

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/sme/sme-interview/story20170921-796955

https://mothership.sg/2018/06/shi-yi-obike-founder/

https://mothership.sg/2018/07/obike-founder-shi-yi-sorry/

https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/21/all-in-one-sales-tech-platform-flashintel-raises-10-million/

https://www.fortunechina.com/detail/people/4040/2016/236/shiyi.htm

https://www.fortunechina.com/detail/people/4040/2023/26/shiyi.htm

Ultimately its up to the administrator to decide whether the page should be kept or not and I don't want to comment on his notability. 2601:645:8400:870:C590:2D13:2AA3:6038 (talk) 23:05, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per Kuru's assessment of the sources along with my own. S0091 (talk) 17:10, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nandiki Gangadhar Reddy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a WP:PROMO article about someone that does not pass the WP:GNG David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 04:35, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Businesspeople, and Odisha. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:02, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Barrie Henderson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear WP:COI or WP:PE. Sources only mention the subject in passing, and notability appears to be lacking. Article includes some promotional content. Fails: WP:GNG. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:50, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and England. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:50, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There are several unreliable sources cited in the article, and the content appears to be AI-generated. The subject fails to meet the requirements of WP:GNG. Baqi:) (talk) 06:45, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Huang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NBIO, not much WP:SIGCOV in independent sources. I don't know if cloud.com counts as "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record". TurboSuperA+_(talk) 09:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. TurboSuperA+_(talk) 09:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Engineering, Computing, California, and Connecticut. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete :There is no coverage at all. I'm surprised this stayed up as long as it has. -- BriefEdits (talk) 07:43, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a suitable redirect target: Apache CloudStack. The article subject is mentioned in the History section. Pavlor (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sheng Liang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NBIO, not much WP:SIGCOV in independent sources. I don't know if cloud.com counts as "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record". TurboSuperA+_(talk) 09:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. TurboSuperA+_(talk) 09:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Computing, China, and Connecticut. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a suitable redirect target: Apache CloudStack. The article subject is mentioned in the History section. Pavlor (talk) 11:53, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ifedayo Agoro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD deleted. No significant valid secondary sourcing WP:RS to prove notability. Sources mostly echo press coverage of her events. Or are features or interviews, not independent analyses of her impact. The entry reads like a promotion for her brand. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 00:33, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 00:33, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG and a cursory search yielded nothing. I can’t even find a credible claim of significance. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:22, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

T.K. Khaleel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable enterpreneur. Sources are routine and mostly PR. Fails GNG. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:33, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Tamil Nadu. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:33, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Mulladam (talk) 08:58, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have revised the article to make sure the sources cited are independent secondary sources. The subject is a famous baker from the GCC with multiple, named industry awards and international recognition. He was the focus of a cover story in the independent trade magazine Gulf Gourmet. The purchase of subject's company by Almarai, a major publicly-traded corporation was a significant economic event in the sector and was reported by independent financial news outlets like Gulf Business. I believe the article now satisfies the requirements of WP:GNG. Thank you! Ashik Jose (talk) 13:21, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Brugnara

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating the Luke Brugnara article for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia’s notability standards for biographies. While the subject has received some coverage due to legal issues, the majority of the article focuses disproportionately on criminal convictions, clearly falls in WP:Crime.

Additionally, much of the content lacks reliable secondary sources and appears to rely on local or sensational media, which may not meet Wikipedia’s standards for verifiability. The article could be viewed as violating Wikipedia’s Neutral Point of View and Biographies of Living Persons policies due to the lack of context and breadth. Unclethepoter (talk) 18:31, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Crime, and California. Shellwood (talk) 18:33, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'm not sure tax evasion is notable. Even defrauding an art dealer is a rather low-level crime. I don't see notability otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 20:26, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
keep I see [8](subscription required) and [9](subscription required) as sufficient to meet WP:GNG, especially in combination with other sources already in the article. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 23:22, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment While the above references 1 & 2 may offer coverage, it's important to consider whether they meet the depth and independence required by WP:GNG. Subscription-only sources can be difficult for other editors to verify, and without access it's hard to assess whether they provide significant coverage or merely mention the subject in passing.

Most of the existing article content appears to rely on primary or court-related sources, which may not establish lasting notability. WP:GNG emphasizes sustained coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources—not just notoriety from legal proceedings. Unless stronger sourcing is presented that demonstrates broad, in-depth coverage beyond criminal activity, I believe the page may not serve an encyclopedic purpose. Unclethepoter (talk) 06:25, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article fails to establish significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, beyond coverage of his legal troubles Per WP:BIO, WP:CRIME and WP:BLP1E.--FreaksIn 15:22, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ramakrishnan Sivaswamy Iyer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bunch of non-notable awards in unreliable, unbylined sources. Has a lot of coverage but none of it is in reliable sources. The Gulfnews article is the only good source among them, but it isn't enough for WP:GNG. ATDR - Transworld Group (shipping and logistics company) Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:06, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, United Arab Emirates, India, and Kerala. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:06, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nominator has said that the awards are non-notable, my comment about the awards are as follows
1. I don't know why and how the award given by President of India recommended by Ministry of External affiars, India, is non-notable?
2. Forbes has listed this personality in Top Indian Business Leaders In The Middle East 2021, how Forbes is non-notable?
3. The Maritime Standard Awards are the prestigious awards of Middle east and Indian Subcontinent. Questioning this award also doesn't make sense.ABDB1 (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article does seem promotional, but I tend to agree with the above comment that it is a bit ridiculous to call those awards non-notable. – Ike Lek (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep:

Pravasi Bharatiya Samman is a very notable award and there's good media coverage about him receiving the award. Also as a chairman of a notable company since 1989, the subject is likely to pass the notability guidelines. Zuck28 (talk) 06:41, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Choi Hyeong-bin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One RS in this (Maeil Business Newspaper); seems to otherwise have insufficient sourcing. Can't find much in Korean language. grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 03:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Companies, and Software. grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 03:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:47, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hallo. just google his name in korean you get a plenty of resources from the independent entities. Packer25 (talk) 07:44, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: yeah, i agree with the Grapesurgeon, only one reliable source Maeil Business Newspaper is good. Baqi:) (talk) 08:26, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Edem Akafia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than press releases masquerading as news stories about his appointment to the Ghana Mines position (you can tell by the very similar wording in all of them), searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show he passes WP:GNG. Disputed redirect without improvement. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:32, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Law, and Ghana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:41, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I believe the subject meets WP:GNG and has in-depth coverage . Also concerning the the rationale "Disputed redirect without improvement."The redirect was disputed by me at 10:01 UTC, and the article was nominated for deletion 30 minutes later. I had already begun working on improvements based on nominator's reason in the edit summary. Nominating for deletion at this stage is premature; the article should be improved, not removed. -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 11:26, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the timing of the nomination shows the importance of using edit summaries. When the article creator reverted the redirect, they gave no indication that they were working on improving it, or even planning to work on it. If they had, I wouldn't have nominated it at that time. But since it has been nominated, if they do supply the necessary sourcing, I'm sure it will result in a KEEP result. Since the article contains numerous sources which do not go towards notability, I would suggest to the KEEP vote above that they let folks know here what the 3 best in-depth sources from independent, reliable sources are, in order to help editors ascertain notability.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:08, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification and I appreciate your good-faith approach. Just to note: I had intended to use the "undo" option to provide an edit summary, but I mistakenly used rollback, which didn’t allow for that. That was my oversight and I appreciate you pointing it out. While I believe the subject meets GNG, I also acknowledge that the article can and should be further improved. @Onel5969 Please see, [10][[11],[12]. , -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 15:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Vardanyan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:10, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Armenia, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.OPHYRIUS ^⚔ 04:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A quick look at the translated Armenian wiki version of this article shows that the subject clearly meets WP:NPOL as a former member of the National Assembly of Armenia for the ARF party. [13] ⁂CountHacker (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Karen Vardanyan is a prominent Armenian businessman and philanthropist, actively involved in public life, including as the head of one of Armenia’s largest holding companies. There are numerous independent Armenian-language sources confirming his notability. I will help improve the article by adding the appropriate references.

Gbp190 (talk) 13:45, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Karen Vardanyan is a notable Armenian businessman and philanthropist, widely recognized in Armenia.

He is the CEO of the largest confectionery producer in Armenia and a prominent public figure. His contributions span across business and philanthropy. He has been covered extensively in reliable sources, including major Armenian news outlets.

Moreover, this article exists in both Armenian and Russian Wikipedias, which further supports his regional notability. The English article has been improved and now cites multiple independent and verifiable sources, demonstrating that the subject clearly meets Wikipedia’s WP:GNG.

Deleting the article would mean erasing the presence of a significant figure in Armenian economic and social life from the English-language encyclopedia.

- Conclusion: The article meets notability criteria and should be kept.

Anna Manasyan (talk) 11:12, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James Helm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A seemingly promotional article about a marketing professional and social media influencer who only received significant coverage in one article in The Inquirer [14]. He was also quoted and discussed in Philadelphia Magazine [15], but he was not the subject of the article—I don't think this counts as significant independent coverage. On the whole, fails WP:BASIC. JBchrch talk 21:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and Pennsylvania. JBchrch talk 21:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there's no allegation or evidence for notability; he fails my standards for attorneys. Bearian (talk) 03:50, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in addition to the Inquirer, Philadelphia Magazine has more than 15 significant paragraphs [16]:

No one represents the it’s-only-a-business new breed as much as TopDog Law, the entity launched by James Helm in 2019, not long after finishing — perhaps tellingly — a dual JD/MBA program at Rutgers.

“It comes down to unit economics,” Helm said cheerfully on a legal industry marketing podcast last year. (The TopDog founder, who grew up in Delco and now spends most of his time in Scottsdale, Arizona, declined my request for a sit-down interview.) In the podcast Helm went on to explain that you first have to know the average fee you generate on a case — if it’s $10,000, you have work to do; if it’s $25,000, you’re doing pretty well. Then you need to calculate the cost of acquiring a client. If you understand those two things — and if the delta between them is large enough — “then I can get aggressive about acquiring new customers, and I can do it profitably.”

Simple, right?

It’s a formula Helm has used with great success. Six years after launching TopDog, Helm’s operation now has a presence, according to its website, in more than 35 cities across the country, from Ann Arbor and Atlanta to Washington, D.C. Thousands of calls and contacts come in each week.

Key to the success have been decisions Helm made early on, starting with the consumer-friendly TopDog name. “I think traditionally [law] firms have been very bad at branding their businesses,” Helm said on the podcast. “Every other industry has names that are easy to say, easy to sell, easy to remember. Whereas with law firms, the brand wasn’t the focus.” In dubbing his outfit TopDog — a moniker that could just as easily have been used on, say, an energy drink or a new brand of kibble — he landed on something that both was easy to remember and conjured up winning. “I think a large part of our success is due to the name,” he said. “TopDog gets you top dollar.”

Helm’s second outside-the-box decision was to focus on social media when it came to marketing. In part the strategy was born of necessity — Helm didn’t have enough money to advertise on TV; even Google AdWords was out of his league. But it also spoke to his age (27 at the time); Instagram and TikTok were as natural to him as TV was to Rand Spear.

“We really thought there was room to revolutionize [legal marketing], especially on the social media front,” says Ian Harrington, TopDog’s first marketing director. (Harrington would go on to work for Pond Lehocky and is now co-founder, with Ryan Makris and Kate Schenkel, of Very Decent Marketer.) “At the time, no law firm was doing social media with any kind of success or results. It wasn’t by accident that we saw that as an opportunity. James was young; he was good-looking. He wasn’t as good on camera as he is now. That actually took a long time to get right. But we were willing to put in the reps to figure it out.”

Early on, TopDog’s social strategy was based on Helm sharing his personal story. A high school wrestler, he’d started taking prescription painkillers following an injury at age 17, and he’s said he spent eight years as an addict before finally entering rehab while in law school. The message to potential clients: I know what it’s like to be down and out. I can help you get your life back.

But in time that strategy gave way to something more over-the-top — kinetic videos of a hyper Helm doing everything from mugging at the camera to rapping. “We had to get our name out there by being bombastic and creating the TopDog persona,” says Harrington. “The algorithms of the platforms push the louder, the bombastic, the faster-cuts kind of stuff. And we really leaned into that.”

As is increasingly the norm in the personal injury law business, the cases Helm generates — through social media or radio or all those TopDog billboards — are not primarily handled by him or any lawyer working for him, but by other lawyers around the country. In fact, if you look closely at the language, you see that TopDog Law isn’t really even a law firm. Helm’s LinkedIn page describes it as “a leading case acquisition and plaintiff intake platform,” while the TopDog website calls it “a national network for law firms licensed to practice in their applicable states.”

The uber-referral model is not one every lawyer — even in the personal injury realm — is comfortable with. “I think it’s important for the consumer to understand who they’re retaining to represent them,” says Spear. “I’m here every day. I work morning till night. I like meeting with clients.”

Perhaps more to the point: Advertising done primarily for the purpose of referring cases to other firms actually runs afoul of Pennsylvania’s Rules of Professional Conduct. As the rules put it: “It is misleading to the public for a lawyer or law firm, with knowledge that the lawyer or law firm will not be handling a majority of the cases attracted by advertising, to nonetheless advertise for those cases only to refer the cases to another lawyer whom the client did not initially contact.”

When I email Helm about this, I get a quick reply from his general counsel, Sean Berberian. He says that because Helm — through the entity Helm Law LLC — maintains joint responsibility for all cases, he’s not, in fact, “referring” matters and is, therefore, “absolutely compliant with Pennsylvania rules of ethics, as well as other applicable jurisdictions.”

As it happens, none of this may even matter. When I ask Thomas Wilkinson, the former Pennsylvania Bar Association president, about the relevant section of Pennsylvania’s rules, he essentially shrugs. “There is not a tremendous amount of policing in Pennsylvania of improper advertising. Sometimes that policing only occurs when there’s been a complaint about the quality of representation or a client feels they’ve been duped in some way. But for the most part, if clients are pleased with the outcomes, they don’t care a great deal about how they got to the lawyer.”

I understand Wilkinson’s point. And yet it still strikes me as odd, the equivalent of a restaurateur — say, Marc Vetri! — running an ad for his restaurant, but then telling you when you call for a reservation that he’s going to get you a table at one of Michael Solomonov’s or Jose Garces’s restaurants.

Then again, for better or worse, what TopDog and so many other personal injury firms are selling is less legal services than the idea of suing in the first place.

His billboard is covered by Philly Voice [17], a profile in OK magazine [18], his social media in Arizona [19]. Judging this against WP:BASIC, "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject," there are five published independent sources. Little Astros Sign (talk) 11:53, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not significant independent coverage of James Helm, the person: it's mostly quotes of him and his staff about his company and the company's business strategy, with some light background info about Helm as founder. If anything it could count as coverage of TopDog, the company he created. More generally, Helm appears to makes a lot of noise about himself on social media and in the real world, so it's not surprising that some news outlet would quote him or mention him, but that still does not count as significant independent coverage. Separately, I am not convinced that OK! is a reliable source. JBchrch talk 12:56, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have found additional sources about him [20] [21] but to me the article seems to be coverage about both him and his company but are you saying that you think that there is coverage for the company not him? I think the opposite because the articles all describe him as a person as the creator of the billboard, and Philadelphia Magazine article mentions him 18 times. Anyway, WP:BASIC — "the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability" — if Inquirer is already one independent source then the other six sources can combine to at least be one (which is more than one meaning it is multiple)? Little Astros Sign (talk) 13:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot access the Law360 article, but the Houston Chronicle article does not appear to offer significant independent coverage of James Helm as a person: it covers the billboard story, mentions that Helm is the person who created it, and quotes Helm. Looking at the sources you provided, the coverage falls in my view under the second prong of the rule you cite, i.e. "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability" (emphasis mine). JBchrch talk 13:24, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hundreds of Wikipedia articles use OK! as a reliable source [22] Little Astros Sign (talk) 20:23, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Three articles plus a few short ones is enough for NBASIC. 🄻 🄰 15:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask which three articles you are referring to? JBchrch talk 19:52, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Please do not introduce large amounts of content to an AFD discussion which should focus on the condition of the article and possible sources, not reproducing those sources here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:51, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Samata (fashion entrepreneur)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fashion designer. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Acoustical (talk) 01:41, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Fashion, Ghana, and United Kingdom. Acoustical (talk) 01:41, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:49, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A good amount of significant coverage to meets the notability of the subject, pass WP:NBIO. Raj Shri21 (talk) 09:55, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 01:42, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Comaford

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined by IP. Fails WP:GNG. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 16:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Technology. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 16:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See also talk page for some discussion on sourcing. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 16:10, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:39, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 16:08, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think she just squeaks through.

Source assessment table
Source	Independent?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Washington Post		Passing mention.	✘ No
Inc.			✔ Yes
The Art Of			✘ No
"Nerds"			✘ No
Podcast			? Unknown
100 conversations for career success	No affiliation with Comaford. Secondary report of the original article by Comaford.		✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Cremastra (talk) 16:33, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The Inc. story is a non-staff opinion piece, not a reliable source. Random podcasts generally aren't reliable either. And "The Art Of" is a corporation that is obviously going to promote people who write for them; the site doesn't even indicate who wrote the bio. Pinging @Cremastra. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:45, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. The Inc. story can also been seen as an interview, which usually do not confer notability. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:07, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It can be seen as an interview, but I don't think that's the right interpretation. It quotes an interview – a primary source – and discusses it. Therefore it is a secondary source. I don't see how it being an opinion piece automatically makes it unreliable, and the author is a regular contributor to the magazine. As regards The Art Of, I suppose the company could be seen to have a COI with the subject, which would compromise their independence, so I'll update the source table there. The podcast's reliability is unclear. I don't think we should assume that little-known sources are unreliable by default, but I'll change that to a question mark. Cremastra (talk) 21:44, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've added another source to the table. Her books are also widely referred to and were bestsellers, so she may also meet WP:NAUTHOR. Cremastra (talk) 22:24, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The 100 conversations source claims that Christine Comaford is a "contributor," so I don't think it can be considered independent. I'm still not very sure about the interview, but you do have a point. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 22:30, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Bardapurkar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are mostly PR and self-published. Not worthy of an article. Fails GNG. Thilsebatti (talk) 07:50, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 07:50, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the Forbes India listing is a made up in one day award for an up and coming but run of the mill business person, producers and managers being especially ordinary. See also WP:NOTFB. The remaining sources are also unreliable or not independent. Bearian (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nominator and Bearian. 🄻 🄰 15:07, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: As I can see in the article, the subject has produced 7 movies (one unreleased) and one web series, so I believe the subject clearly meets WP:PRODUCER. Best! Baqi:) (talk) 13:38, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The fact of having produced seven films and a web series, on its own, meets none of the criteria at WP:PRODUCER at all, let alone clearly. I'm not saying he doesn't meet those criteria, just that it takes more than what you said about him. Largoplazo (talk) 14:35, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Largoplazo, Thank you for your comments. If you look at point number three under Creative professionals, I believe the subject clearly meets WP:PRODUCER. That said, if in your view the subject still doesn't meet the criteria, could you please clarify what more would be required for them to pass WP:PRODUCER? Best! Baqi:) (talk) 10:37, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(1) You're treating point 3 as though it says, in its entirety, "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a collective body of work." (2) Why are you asking me about "if in your view the subject still doesn't meet the criteria" when I stated very clearly "I'm not saying he doesn't meet those criteria"? I wasn't commenting on whether he meets the criteria, I was pointing out that your remarks failed to show that he does. Largoplazo (talk) 11:40, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Largoplazo: Exactly, that’s what I’m trying to understand: what more would be required for the subject to clearly meet that criterion? Baqi:) (talk) 13:25, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can't help you further because I don't understand what part of the criterion you aren't understanding, if you read all of it, including all the parts that go beyond playing a role in co-creating a collective body of work. Largoplazo (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Agreeing with Baqi, the subject passes WP:NPRODUCER. If someone believes that the subject is non-notable, they need to prove how. It must very obviously pass the notability guidelines. Zuck28 (talk) 18:49, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's notability that needs to be demonstrated in cases of disagreement, not non-notability. We have criteria for assessing notability, not for assessing non-notability. If it's obvious that the person meets those criteria, you ought to be able to explain how. Largoplazo (talk) 18:57, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The subject is a well-known and notable figure in Marathi cinema. He is founder of Planet Marathi, with coverage in reliable sources like Hindustan Times and others in regional languages. He clearly meets WP:NPRODUCER. Monhiroe (talk) 06:36, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
While Akshay Bardapurkar may be active in Marathi cinema, notability on Wikipedia is not based on fame or familiarity, but on meeting criteria like WP:GNG and WP:NPROF, WP:NPRODUCER, etc. The article currently lacks multiple, in-depth, independent, and reliably sourced profiles. Most sources are trivial mentions, event-based PR, or local coverage. Several sources are affiliated or self-published.

The mere founding of a company (Planet Marathi) does not confer notability unless independent, sustained coverage exists about him—not just his projects. As it stands, he does not meet the threshold for WP:NPRODUCER. Thilsebatti (talk) 06:33, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 15:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source analysis

No.	Source	Type	Independence	Reliability	Notes
1	The Week – "Akshay Bardapurkar: A versatile producer..."	Feature/Profile	✅ Independent	✅🟩 Reliable	Reliable magazine but tone is promotional and coverage is not critical.
2	Financial Express – "Plays a pivotal role in promoting..."	Passing mention	✅ Independent	✅🟩 Reliable	Reliable source, but the coverage is trivial.
3	Vogue India – "Entrepreneur redefining culture..."	Profile	✅ Independent	✅🟩 Reliable	Glossy coverage, borderline promotional.
4	Lokmat – Award announcement	⚠️ Affiliated	✅🟩 Reliable (regional)	Affiliated with Marathi cinema; routine coverage.
5	SheThePeople – Award mention	✅ Independent	⚠️🟨 Marginal	Source is borderline; not considered highly reliable.
6	IMDb	❌ Self-published	❌🟥 Unreliable	Not considered reliable per WP:USERG.
7	Hindustan Times – Celebrity quote	✅ Independent	✅🟩 Reliable	Only includes a quote, not about the subject.
8	Maharashtra Times – event coverage	⚠️ Semi-affiliated	✅🟩 Reliable	Not in-depth or significant.
9	ABP Majha – launch event	⚠️ Semi-affiliated	✅🟩 Reliable	Source is routine and local.
10	YouTube (interviews)	❌ Self-published	❌🟥 Unreliable	Fails both WP:RS and WP:INDY.
11	Twitter	❌ Self-published	❌🟥 Unreliable	Not usable as source.
12	Indian Express – Film mention	✅ Independent	✅🟩 Reliable	Not focused on Bardapurkar, passing role.
13	Mint – business event	✅ Independent	✅🟩 Reliable	Brief reference in larger business context.
14	Loksatta – press event	⚠️ Affiliated	✅🟩 Reliable	Routine event coverage.
15	Sakal Times – business feature	⚠️ Local independent	⚠️🟨 Marginal	Short, low-depth.
16	YourStory	❌ Not reliable	❌🟥 Unreliable	Blacklisted per WP:RELIABLE.
17	DNA India	✅ Independent	✅🟩 Reliable	Passing mention, not substantial.
18	Mid-Day – interview	✅ Independent	⚠️🟨 Marginal	Interview-based, borderline reliability.
19	CineBlitz	⚠️ Semi-affiliated	⚠️🟨 Marginal	Considered low-tier entertainment media.
20	India Today – cultural feature	✅ Independent	✅🟩 Reliable	One-time event highlight.
21	Business World – award list	✅ Independent	⚠️🟨 Marginal	Non-substantive inclusion in a listicle.

All the sources are routine mentions, affiliated coverage, or lack in-depth, critical treatment. The subject don't have independent coverage and fails WP:GNG. Thilsebatti (talk) 06:31, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Yates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most current references barely touch on him as a person or are entirely about his vending machine company. Maxim and Forbes cites are the best, but they read as puff pieces. Matt Deres (talk) 20:23, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Matt Deres (talk) 20:23, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:55, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:18, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 20:55, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I checked a number of sources like this; this and this and they don't even mention Yates. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:43, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect- to Fresh Healthy Vending, if the subject on its own lacks SIGCOV to support its own article as a standalone.Lorraine Crane (talk) 09:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Fresh Healthy Vending. The sources I could find are almost exclusively about his company. The only thing I could find that might suggest notability independent of that company is that he was fined $3.5 million by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission over a previous business venture [23] [24], but I couldn't find any SIGCOV of him associated with that episode either. MCE89 (talk) 11:40, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Esufaly Goolamhusen Adamaly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing to establish Goolamhusen's notability. Fails WP:GNG. Raj Shri21 (talk) 07:25, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Sri Lanka. Raj Shri21 (talk) 07:25, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep satisfies WP:NPOLITICIAN. Dan arndt (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun Deshpande

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article of a young businessman without any SIGCOV. Sources are paid pieces. No independent in-depth coverage and fails GNG. Thilsebatti (talk) 11:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 11:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Likely passes GNG but most of the sources are about the company. Zuck28 (talk) 07:24, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:13, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. Conducted a WP:BEFORE search and found some reliable sources to the subject but not found significant coverage about him in the references. So, fails to pass WP:SIGCOV. I will support for redirect, If suitable topic to redirect is found. Fade258 (talk) 14:56, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete The sources that are cited in the article are not reliable. For it to meet WP:GNG, it needs more extensive coverage from trustworthy sources. Bakhtar40 (talk) 07:15, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Garg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Majorly citations are WP:NEWSORGINDIA, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Just a detailed resume WP:NOTRESUME. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:17, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:17, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Haryana, Karnataka, Telangana, and Uttar Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Moglix. LibStar (talk) 06:00, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject has received in-depth coverage from multiple reliable and independent sources, including Forbes India (1, 2, 3), The Times of India (link), The Economic Times (link), and Navbharat Times (link). He was also featured in Forbes India’s “Tycoons of Tomorrow” and " Fortune's 40 Under 40” list. The subject clearly meets the notability criteria under WP:ANYBIO. Salmon dee (talk) 09:03, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Old-AgedKid (talk) 12:08, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with or redirect to Moglix. The sources seem to primarily give notability to the company rather than Garg himself. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 14:37, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Moglix: sources are mostly about Moglix, not the founder. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:47, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Found some more articles during my (WP:BEFORE) search, such as those from Free Press Journal, Economic Times, and Forbes that cover the founder in good detail and meet (WP:NBIO). The article does not read like a resume, and even if parts do, they can easily be cleaned up with standard editing. Cheers! Baqi:) (talk) 06:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FPJ article is unbylined and the Economic Times piece merely repeats what he says about himself, without any secondary analysis by the journalist. Neither of these sources count towards WP:GNG. Notability is not inherited, so the notability of the company cannot be attributed to the BLP. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:48, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The subject appears to meet the notability criteria under WP:NBIO based on significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. The articles cited above include in-depth profiles that focus on the individual’s entrepreneurial journey and contributions, rather than solely on the associated company. Monhiroe (talk) 18:07, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kalpesh Mehta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a lesser-known enterpreneur. There is nothing comprehensive about the person in any of the sources. Sources are routine and mostly PR. Does not meet WP:GNG Thilsebatti (talk) 08:26, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 08:26, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning towards a weak keep; after discounting all PR articles, there are some sources that offer significant coverage.Chanel Dsouza (talk) 11:40, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The subject seems to be notable, as I have found [25], [26], [27], and [28], hence it passes WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. Taabii (talk) 15:09, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There’s ample in-depth media coverage available in reliable sources, often with bylines to demonstrate GNG and ANYBIO. Zuck28 (talk) 07:12, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. My preference is to retain. The topic is noteworthy due to substantial coverage from credible sources provided in the article and anlayzed by Taabii. It meets the criteria of WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Monhiroe (talk) 08:40, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: While outlets like India TV, Business Today, and News18 are mentioned in the article, most of the coverage is either routine or promotional in nature. The sources provided by Taabii aren't in-depth, biographical sources. For someone to meet WP:GNG, we need significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, not just passing mentions or PR-style writeups. Most of the article focuses on Mehta’s connection to Tribeca Developers, which seems to function mainly as a marketing or licensing partner for Trump-branded projects in India. That kind of association doesn't automatically establish notability, unless the individual himself has received consistent, independent media attention separate from the brand. A lot of the coverage cited feels promotional, some of it reads more like press releases than independent journalism. The sources focus more on the real estate projects than on Mehta as a notable figure, and they lack any real critical or analytical depth. Claiming this subject passes WP:NBIO seems like a stretch. There’s no clear evidence of any major impact on the real estate industry, no notable awards, and no leadership in globally recognized companies.Thilsebatti (talk) 09:45, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Old-AgedKid (talk) 12:04, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom, most of the sources are routine or PR. Quite a few are also WP:NEWSORGINDIA. There isn't enough WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS to support WP:NBIO.--DesiMoore (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay ghodawat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreated over and over at Sanjay Ghodawat, until the title got protected. Still nowhere close to meeting WP:GNG. No source with significant, independent coverage. Junbeesh (talk) 09:34, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Junbeesh (talk) 09:34, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and protect this page too. The last deletion of Sanjay Ghodawat was in 2016 [29] and there is no evidence he has become notable since then. Astaire (talk) 03:56, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Most of the previous deletions were "unambiguous promotion". This page does not seem exceptionally promotional to me. Further it states importance "head of a conglomorate" namely Sanjay Ghodawat Group. The eponymous university is listed as a private university on ugc.gov.in as private 2(f), although you'll need to use internet archive as the site is down at the moment - and the details page is not archived there. It is not listed in their fake universities or other bad lists, again according to the archive. At the very least there should be a redirect to the group from the correct capitalisation. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 09:56, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Old-AgedKid (talk) 12:02, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is nothing to see In-depth coverage from reliable sources. Hardy to satisfying WP:GNG, His company is notable. Bakhtar40 (talk) 07:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abhay Deshpande

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Majorly citations are WP:NEWSORGINDIA, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Just a detailed resume WP:NOTRESUME. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:11, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Maharashtra. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:11, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This seems to be a semi-common name so some caution is needed when searching for him but I found nothing substantial that can be tied to this individual that isn't a routine business announcement or press release. The language in the article is also badly in need of clean up :( Moritoriko (talk) 04:37, 8 July 2025 (UTC) Moritoriko (talk) 04:37, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:41, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Subhrakant Panda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Majorly citations are WP:NEWSORGINDIA, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Just a detailed resume WP:NOTRESUME. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:05, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Odisha. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:05, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Subject is definitely Notable. There is extensive coverage of the topic in trustworthy sources (WP:RS) like Business Line, CNBC TV, and The Economic Times that establishes firmly that the topic qualifies under WP:GNG. One of the arguments of the nominator is that the article is written like a resume. I would like to propose that if there are any flaws in the tone or organization of the article, then indeed they may be made better. That's the purpose that editors are here for, to enhance content, not delete it. Baqi:) (talk) 07:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The subject meets WP:GNG. The person's work has won significant critical attention with significant coverage in multiple reliable sources like this. The tone or formatting can be addressed through editing. Monhiroe (talk) 05:56, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per significant coverage in multiple reliable sources identified in this discussion that shows a pass of WP:GNG. LKBT (talk) 07:30, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article looked promising but it is part of the "Opinion" section of Business Standard. Regardless, I'm not seeing WP:THREE as the rest of the coverage is routine. The author is blocked for sockpuppetry, so this might be eligible for speedy deletion under WP:G5. Yuvaank (talk) 22:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 22:54, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. The articles are more about the company and federation than a profile on him. Agnieszka653 (talk) 18:35, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kushal N. Desai

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural renomination. First nomination achieved a no consensus result exclusively because of the keep votes by a group of sockpuppet dedicated to AFD fraud. I'm asking for a re-evaluation of the deletion discussion, now free of brigading by the now blocked group. Reason is same: A promotional biography of a businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Majorly citations are WP:NEWSORGINDIA, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Just a detailed resume WP:NOTRESUME. Also, simply being the grandson of an industrialist doesn't justify having a Wikipedia page. Notability cannot be inherited. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 07:14, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 07:14, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Gujarat and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (weakly) - the Dharmsinh Desai University appears to be the only reliable source. Bearian (talk) 14:00, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article's tone has already been adjusted to make it more neutral and less like a resume. It also now has sufficient good independent sources. The subject is a notable billionaire, featured on Forbes, and has received significant coverage in Business Today, Fortune India, and Forbes. He was listed among the top Indian billionaires. Mentions in the Hurun India Rich List, Fortune India, and Waterfield Advisors are also noteworthy. The subject meets the criteria under WP:NBASIC.Lobbymaster (talk) 09:46, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Lobbymaster is a Wikipedia:SPA. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:42, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 10:06, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Juwon Lawal Razaq

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. No valid secondary sourcing that is independent. This reads like a press kit, heavily promotional. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 02:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 02:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, although I'd like to hear from Bonadea about whether an attempt to improve the article succeeded. Bearian (talk) 09:19, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolaus Kimla

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional and of questionable WP:SUSTAINED notability. Amigao (talk) 18:18, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Austria. Shellwood (talk) 18:25, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Aneirinn (talk) 20:20, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been updated with more credible sources. Let me know if there's any additional changes you would like to see made. Colleenm83 (talk) 02:42, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Old-AgedKid (talk) 07:08, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already at AFD so Soft deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:33, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 2nd source in the article (CEO Spotlight) is that only one that contributes to demonstrating notability. – Ike Lek (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohit Marwah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Lacks Wp:SIGCOV. Most of the sources are either passing mentions or non-bylined promotional articles. Wp:NEWSORGINDIA. His acting career consists of two films in which he has non-lead roles, and no award nominations or wins, failing Wp:NACTOR.

His additional credits include non-notable short films and music videos.

He received some press coverage due to his connection with the Ambani and Kapoor families and his marriage but notability is not inherited. Zuck28 (talk) 12:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Businesspeople, Fashion, India, Delhi, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and New York. Zuck28 (talk) 12:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NACTOR even WP:NBASIC, also wikipedia is not WP:INHERITED. Baqi:) (talk) 08:57, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep He had lead roles in two notable (if average) films, so just meets WP:NACTOR. See WP:ICTFSOURCES for reliable sources for Indian films - there are additional, reliable sources in the articles about the films which could be added here. It appears that he is now a managing director at a university - this [30] is not a reliable source (being sponsored content and full of peacockery), but if a reliable source could be found, that info could be added to the article to bring it up to date. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:05, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 05:50, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject meets WP:NACTOR with lead roles in two feature films. I can find references which are enough to support the case. Sooterout (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which of the sources, demonstrates that these two roles are lead roles? Zuck28 (talk) 19:02, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The actor did have significant roles in Fugly and Raag Desh. In fact, in the latter, the subject was featured on the theatrical poster, which strongly suggests that he was one of the central characters. In Fugly as well, the actor played a major role that received attention and analysis in reviews by film critics.Chanel Dsouza (talk) 12:06, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reopening and relisting, in my individual capacity as an uninvolved admin, per WP:REOPEN.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:23, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vera Cherepanova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Not supported by reliable and significant sources. More than half of the current sources ([31][32][33][34][35][36]) are primary. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Women, and ~~United Arab Emirates~~. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I draftified the page but the author moved it back to mainspace without improvement. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:54, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not sure about any connection to the UAE? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. I meant the United States. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:06, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oho! Makes more sense. In any case, I don't think she passes WP:GNG, so Delete Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:08, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have a google alert for my name and Mrs. Cherepanova's name - we authored a case together in 2020. The case study received a few awards, including Outstanding New Case Writer - https://www.thecasecentre.org/AwardsComps/winners/year/2020

I know that Vera has a number of other awards and honours but they are industry-specific, e.g. she was named best compliance officer by IBLF / E&Y in 2011 - http://iblfrussia.org/news/detail.php?ID=566

I don't think the article needs to be deleted, but in current form it definitely doesn't reflect Mrs. Cherepanova's achievements and overall impact the made in the EU & US compliance industry.

Needs more work. Normalnot (talk) 09:13, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Normalnot. How did you get a Google alert? Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 10:19, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fancy Refrigerator I have google alerts https://www.google.com/alerts set up for a number of keywords. The one that fired was for this page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red - through which I found this discussion. All that said, given my connection to Mrs. Cherepanova I'm probably in violation of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:COIE and shouldn't be part of this discussion. Normalnot (talk) 11:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please follow WP:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI to make a conflict of interest disclosure. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 11:26, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 06:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep [37], [38] and [39] are enough to establish notability. Thus, it has GNG 102.91.77.177 (talk) 09:05, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those are primary sources. They should not be used to establish notability. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The IPs only contribution to WP... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:39, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 07:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 08:56, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sacha Dragic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear notability. Current sources appear routine and more focused on this person's company than him. I am not sure that he meets notability guidelines as a WP:BUSINESSPERSON. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 00:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, France, Romania, and Serbia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this article meets Wikipedia’s general notability guidelines. Sacha Dragic has received significant and sustained coverage in multiple reliable, secondary sources that discuss him in-depth and independently of any Superbet promotional material.

For example:

– Sacha Dragic returns to the helm as co-CEO: https://igamingbusiness.com/people/sacha-dragic-superbet/

– Sacha Dragic enters the insurance market: https://www.profit.ro/stiri/confirmare-sacha-dragic-fondatorul-superbet-intra-pe-piata-asigurarilor-20952276

– Gaming Intelligence: Superbet founder Sacha Dragic returns as co-CEO: https://www.gamingintelligence.com/people/moves/201438-superbet-founder-sacha-dragic-to-return-as-co-ceo/

These are a few links that are cited in the current Wikipedia article; there are more sources online, but I started with the ones that are already present here and talk about Sacha Dragic as a well-known entrepreneur, not just as Superbet CEO. I believe the links I listed above are not trivial mentions; they demonstrate that he is a notable figure in both Romanian business and the international gaming sector.

Based on the standard outlined at WP:GNG, I recommend that we keep the article. Vaderthedarklab (talk) 11:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For more community input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 07:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Coverage is focused on Superbet or if there is in-depth coverage it is in betting-related sites. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Gheus (talk) 17:45, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:BUSINESSPERSON. Also fails WP:SIGCOV from RSes. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 01:36, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]