Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 December 13
Appearance
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
[edit]- Doctor Who (series 5) (history · last edit) Yesterday I removed text which was the same as [1]. The blog entry is dated 9 October 2010, and the article did not contain the text in November 2010 [2]. The contributor has a reasonable sounding claim that he/she wrote the text (See talk page). Can we have some eyes on this please? Edgepedia (talk) 07:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Backwardscopy. Tag and explanation placed at talk page. See article's talk page. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Doctor Who (series 1) (history · last edit) from I suspect the orginal TV listings [3] gives a large number of results. [4] has the complete list. I removed it [5], but was re-instated [6] Edgepedia (talk) 13:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's only the episode summaries that I believe to be a problem. I have done some research and the results are on the talk page. Edgepedia (talk) 22:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Glimmer721 talk 03:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
I've replaced them with my own summaries I wrote. Glimmer721 talk 03:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's only the episode summaries that I believe to be a problem. I have done some research and the results are on the talk page. Edgepedia (talk) 22:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sappinia pedata (history · last edit) from http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/sappinia/faqs.html. Velella Velella Talk 17:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. The CDC is a US Government source, its website confirms that material on its website is in the public domain. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Kottakkal Arya Vaidya Sala (history · last edit) from here. The article itself is notable, but it is all pretty much copied from that source, or variations of it. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 19:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)